Cited by 81Team Dynamics and PerformanceKnowledge Management and SharingOnline and Blended Learning

Exploring the Effect of Distance: An Experimental Investigation of Virtual Collaboration, Social Loafing, and Group Decisions

Blaskovich, Jennifer L.·2008·Journal of Information Systems

Abstract

Contemporary businesses are rapidly embracing virtual collaboration as a flexible, cheaper, and more efficient method for conducting group work. Past research has shown, however, that virtual groups operate quite differently than face-to-face groups. In this study, Social Impact Theory provides a framework to investigate whether virtual collaboration heightens social loafing—the tendency for individuals to contribute less than full effort to a group. The theory predicts that member distance, inherent in virtual collaboration, increases the propensity of group members to loaf, and decreases group performance. Two hundred seventy-nine participants assigned to face-to-face or virtual groups completed a business resources allocation task. Results suggest that virtual collaboration negatively affects group performance and that social loafing behavior may partially explain this result. The findings imply that organizations should carefully consider whether virtual collaboration can be seamlessly substituted for face-to-face group interaction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2308/jis.2008.22.1.27

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Because virtual teams depend on technology, members can withdraw when their disengagement is unnoticed, owing to reduced social pressure.

    “In addition to this, in situations where disengagement is not apparent, virtual team's reliance on technology to communicate allows team members to disengage from the team due to decreased social impact [16].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blaskovich, J. L.
Affiliations
University of Nebraska at Omaha (US)
Corresponding author
Blaskovich, Jennifer L.
Venue
Journal of Information Systems
Published
2008-03-01
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
27-46
ISSN
  • 0888-7985 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-7959
OpenAlex
W2077688973
Cited by
81
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 5
FWCI
6.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Information Systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Knowledge Management and Sharing
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
Keywords
remote collaboration, social loafing, group decision making, social impact theory, group performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review