The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Equity Valuation and Corporate Control.
Abstract
The proliferation of control contests for large public corporations at 50% + premiums above market Illustrates the wide divergence between open-market stock prices and equity exchange values. This paper considers equity valuation in corporate control transactions-e.g., management buyouts and hostile takeovers-that engender potentially severe manager-stockholder conflicts. These conflicts generate a demand for independent assessments of equity values by investment bankers who specialize in these appraisals. The paper provides evidence from (1) a large sample of fairness opinions on management buyouts, and (2) a small sample of investment bankers' working papers which indicates that investment bankers' valuation techniques make extensive use of accounting data. This demand for accounting information in equity valuation is distinct from that previously recognized in the capital markets or contracting literatures.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This specification is particularly interesting because it was customary to price HLTs as multiples of EBITDA.[See Kaplan (1989b) and DeAngelo (1990)].”
From The Valuation of Cash Flow Forecasts: An Empirical Analysis (1995) · cites this paper as DeAngelo (1990)
Citations
Cites
Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions When Firms Have InformationThat Investors Do Not Have
Myers, S., & Majluf, N. (1984) · doi:10.3386/w1396 · Cited by 6,745
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Markup Pricing in Mergers and Acquisitions
Schwert, G. (1996) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(95)00865-c · Cited by 862
Are Accruals during Initial Public Offerings Opportunistic?
Teoh, S., Wong, T., & Rao, G. R. (1998) · doi:10.1023/a:1009688619882 · Cited by 758
“If accruals are independent, and identically distributed with constant mean and variance, differencing will induce a negative serial correlation (of−0.5); see Dechow (1994) and Choi, Gramlich, and Thomas (1993).”
InfluentialHow Are Firms SoldPreprint
Boone, A. L., & Mulherin, J. (2006) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.642306 · Cited by 544
The Valuation of Cash Flow Forecasts: An Empirical Analysis
KAPLAN, S. N., & RUBACK, R. S. (1995) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1995.tb04050.x · Cited by 512
Gilson, S. C., Hotchkiss, E. S., & Ruback, R. S. (2000) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.110388 · Cited by 247
“DeAngelo 1990 describes the information and methods used by investment bankers to estimate values in corporate control transactions.”
Metadata
- Authors
- DeAngelo, L. E.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- DeAngelo, Linda Elizabeth
- Venue
- The Accounting Review
- Publisher
- American Accounting Association
- Published
- 1990-01-01
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 93-112
- ISSN
- 0001-4826 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-7967
- OpenAlex
- W35803484
- Cited by
- 116
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 5.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Accounting Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Financial Reporting and Valuation Research
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Corporate Finance and Governance
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
- Keywords
- stock valuation, corporate control, management buyout, hostile takeovers, fairness opinions, investment bankers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review