Cited by 18Oral microbiology and periodontitis researchDental Implant Techniques and OutcomesDental materials and restorations

Morphological measurement of biologic width in Chinese people

Open access
Xie, Guang-yuan, Chen, Ji-Hua, Wang, Hui, Wang, Ying-jie·2007·Journal of Oral Science

Abstract

This study evaluated the biologic width in a Chinese population. Ten autopsy specimens of human jaws from 5 male Han Chinese cadavers were collected. Block sections of the jaws were dissected at autopsy. Six-mum-thick, mesio-distal and bucco-lingual sections were cut and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. The widths of the junctional epithelium and connective tissue were measured with a micrometer microscope at the middle of the mesial, distal, buccal, and lingual sites. Differences in biologic width among the 4 measured sites as well as between anterior and posterior teeth were compared. The mean biologic width was 2.17 mm. The width of the junctional epithelium was 1.07 mm, and that of the connective tissue 1.10 mm. The biologic width varied among the 4 sites and the width of the posterior teeth was greater than that of the anterior teeth.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2334/josnusd.49.197

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Biologic width dimensions (JE and SCTA) can only be assessed by histology.

    “Biologic width dimensions (JE and SCTA) can only be assessed by histology.3,4,11”

    From Dental prostheses and tooth‐related factors (2018) · cites this paper as [11]

    The Materials and Methods and Results describe measuring junctional epithelium and connective tissue attachment in stained tissue sections using a microscope. The paper does not state that histology is the only way to assess those dimensions; the word “only” goes beyond its findings. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xie, G.-Y., Chen, J.-H., Wang, H., & Wang, Y.-J.
Affiliations
Air Force Medical University (CN)
Venue
Journal of Oral Science
Published
2007
Volume
49
Issue
3
Pages
197-200
ISSN
  • 1343-4934 (ISSN-L)
  • 1880-4926
OpenAlex
W2101865840
Cited by
18
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Oral Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Dental materials and restorations
Keywords
biological width, Chinese population, Han Chinese, anterior and posterior teeth, periodontal anatomy
MeSH terms
Cadaver, China, Connective Tissue, Epithelial Attachment, Gingiva, Humans, Male, Reference Values, Asian People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review