Cited by 40Patient-Provider Communication in HealthcareDiabetes Management and EducationObesity and Health Practices

Building therapeutic relationships: choosing words that put people first

Open access
Dickinson, Jane K., Maryniuk, Melinda D.·2017·Clinical Diabetes

Abstract

As health care professionals (HCPs), what we know, do, and say has an impact on people. People with diabetes come to us when they are vulnerable, and our knowledge, actions, and words give us the power to help them overcome their fear and learn what they need to take care of themselves. Unfortunately, the words used in diabetes care often lead to shame instead. When HCPs interact with people who are diagnosed with diabetes, we often use words such as “diabetic,” “should,” “test,” “control,” “noncompliant,” and “morbidly obese.” Although these words have been part of the health care lexicon for years, many people with diabetes find them negative and judgmental and often shut down when they hear them. Negative words are not helping people better manage their disease and may even be hurting them. People with diabetes experience abundant guilt, shame, and blame. Society in general, and HCPs in particular, often refer to diabetes as a “lifestyle disease.” This alone sends a message of judgment. The literature shows that words make a difference in health (1), and some groups have already taken the initiative in changing the language used in specific health-related conditions. It is time for diabetes care professionals to do the same. The messages we send in health care can have an impact on patient-provider communication and, ultimately, relationships. Through messages that empower people with diabetes, we can build trust and rapport. This increases the likelihood that patients will communicate openly and honestly with us and listen to our suggestions. A language movement is not a new concept. Psychologists, health professionals, and even the lay community have been discussing the language of health care for more than half a century. Diabetes Australia published a position statement on language …

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/cd16-0014

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dickinson, J. K., & Maryniuk, M. D.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Joslin Diabetes Center (US)
Corresponding author
Dickinson, Jane K.
Venue
Clinical Diabetes
Published
2017-01-01
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
51-54
ISSN
  • 0891-8929 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-4953
OpenAlex
W2575567989
Cited by
40
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5
FWCI
6.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Diabetes (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
Keywords
therapeutic relationship, patient-provider communication, stigma, health care terminology, patient empowerment, trust and rapport, language movement, diabetes self-management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review