Cited by 664Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and Education

Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2022 Abridged for Primary Care Providers

Open access
American Diabetes Association·2022·Clinical Diabetes

Abstract

American Diabetes AssociationThe American Diabetes Association's (ADA's) Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes (the Standards) is updated and published annually in a supplement to the January issue of Diabetes Care.The Standards are developed by the ADA's multidisciplinary Professional Practice Committee, which comprises expert diabetes health care professionals.The Standards include the most current evidence-based recommendations for diagnosing and treating adults and children with all forms of diabetes.ADA's grading system uses A, B, C, or E to show the evidence level that supports each recommendation.A-Clear evidence from well-conducted, generalizable randomized controlled trials that are adequately powered B-Supportive evidence from well-conducted cohort studies C-Supportive evidence from poorly controlled or uncontrolled studies E-Expert consensus or clinical experience This is an abridged version of the current Standards of Care containing the evidence-based recommendations most pertinent to primary care.The recommendations, tables, and figures included here retain the same numbering used in the complete Standards.All of the recommendations included here are substantively the same as in the complete Standards.The abridged version does not include references.The complete 2022 Standards of Care, including all supporting references, is available at professional.diabetes.org/standards.*After the onset of puberty or after 10 years of age, whichever occurs earlier.If tests are normal, repeat testing at a minimum of 3-year intervals, or more frequently if BMI is increasing or risk factor profile deteriorating, is recommended.Reports of type 2 diabetes before age 10 years exist, and this can be considered with numerous risk factors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/cd22-as01

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
American Diabetes Association
Corresponding author
American Diabetes Association
Venue
Clinical Diabetes
Published
2022-01-01
Volume
40
Issue
1
Pages
10-38
ISSN
  • 0891-8929 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-4953
OpenAlex
W4200511306
Cited by
664
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 72 · 2025: 122 · 2024: 180 · 2023: 192 · 2022: 94 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
87.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Diabetes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Touro Scholar (Touro College) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
Keywords
diabetes care standards, primary care, evidence-based recommendations, type 2 diabetes, type 1 diabetes, diabetes diagnosis, diabetes treatment, glycemic control, diabetes screening, pediatric diabetes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review