Cited by 11Diabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and ResearchChronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes

Time to Treatment Intensification to Reduce Diabetes-Related Complications: A Post Hoc Study

Open access
Kaewbut, Piranee, Kosachunhanun, Natapong, Phrommintikul, Arintaya, Chinwong, Dujrudee, Hall, John J., Chinwong, Surarong·2022·Healthcare

Abstract

Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) can be affected by clinical inertia, leading to abysmal results. Studies on a suitable timeframe for treatment intensification remain scarce—especially outside of developed countries. This study aimed to explore the association between time to treatment intensification and diabetes-related complications. A database from a tertiary care hospital in Thailand was retrieved in order to conduct a retrospective cohort study for the years 2011–2017. This study comprised outpatients with T2DM presenting an HbA1c of ≥7.0%. Eligible patients were divided into three groups based on the time of treatment intensification: no delayed treatment intensification, treatment intensification within 6 months, and treatment intensification after 6 months. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to investigate the association between time to treatment intensification and diabetes-related complications. A total of 686 patients were included in the final analysis. During 6.5 years of median follow-up, the group with treatment intensification within 6 months was more strongly associated with diabetic nephropathy compared to the group with no delayed treatment intensification (adjusted HR 2.35; 95%CI 1.35–4.09). Our findings reveal that delaying treatment intensification by even 6 months can increase the likelihood of diabetic nephropathy compared to no delayed treatment intensification. We suggest that patients with T2DM whose blood glucose levels are outside the target range promptly receive treatment intensification.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/healthcare10091673

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Models constructed with clinical data such as electronic health records, laboratory tests, and imaging are the most widely used due to their high accessibility.

    “At the feature level, models constructed with clinical data such as EHR [148, 149], laboratory tests [150, 151], and imaging [152, 153] are the most widely used due to their high accessibility.”

    From Artificial intelligence-powered prediction of diabetic complications: from clinical data to molecular omics (2026) · cites this paper as [151]

    The Data Collection and Statistical Analysis sections describe using laboratory results, including HbA1c and LDL-C, in a multivariable regression model. They do not establish that models using clinical data are the most widely used or that accessibility explains their use. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kaewbut, P., Kosachunhanun, N., Phrommintikul, A., Chinwong, D., Hall, J. J., & Chinwong, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Phayao (TH)
  • Chiang Mai University (TH)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Chinwong, Surarong
Venue
Healthcare
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-09-01
Volume
10
Issue
9
Pages
1673
ISSN
2227-9032 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4294151453
Cited by
11
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Healthcare (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Graduate School, Chiang Mai University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, treatment intensification, clinical inertia, diabetes complications, diabetic nephropathy, glycemic control, HbA1c

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review