Cited by 37Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and Education

Beneficial effects of Control-IQ automated insulin delivery in basal-bolus and basal-only insulin users with type 2 diabetes

Open access
Levy, Carol J., Raghinaru, Dan, Kudva, Yogish C., Pandit, Keta, Blevins, Thomas, Casaubon, Luis, Desjardins, Donna, Levister, Camilla M. +5 more·2024·Clinical Diabetes

Abstract

The t:slim X2 insulin pump with Control-IQ technology (Control-IQ) advanced hybrid closed-loop automated insulin delivery system was evaluated in this prospective single-arm trial. Thirty adults with type 2 diabetes using the Control-IQ system showed substantial glycemic improvement with no increase in hypoglycemia. Mean time in range (70–180 mg/dL) improved 15%, representing an increase of 3.6 hours/day, and mean glucose decreased by 22 mg/dL.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/cd23-0025

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A small single-arm prospective study in adults with type 2 diabetes on MDI who started AID showed TIR improvement of 15% at 6 weeks.

    “Nevertheless, data are increasing; a small, single-arm prospective study in adults with type 2 diabetes who were on MDI and started an AID system revealed improvement of TIR by 15% at 6 weeks (248).”

    From 7. Diabetes Technology: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [248]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Levy, C. J., Raghinaru, D., Kudva, Y. C., Pandit, K., Blevins, T., Casaubon, L., Desjardins, D., Levister, C. M., O’Malley, G., Reid, C., Lum, J., Kollman, C., & Beck, R. W.
Affiliations
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • Jaeb Center for Health Research (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Texas Diabetes & Endocrinology (US)
Corresponding author
Lum, John
Venue
Clinical Diabetes
Published
2023-08-28
Volume
42
Issue
1
Pages
116-124
ISSN
  • 0891-8929 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-4953
OpenAlex
W4386212186
Cited by
37
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 1
FWCI
7.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Diabetes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, artificial pancreas, Control-IQ, hybrid closed-loop system, multiple daily insulin injections, glycemic control, time in range, hypoglycemia, continuous glucose monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review