Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 300

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 84 of the 84 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Genetics of Type 1 Diabetes: What's Next?

Open access
Pociot, Flemming, Akolkar, Beena, Concannon, Patrick, Erlich, Henry A., Julier, Cécile, Morahan, Grant, Nierras, Concepcion R., Todd, John A., Rich, Stephen S., Nerup, Jørn·2010·Diabetes

Abstract

The discovery of the association between HLA in the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) on chromosome 6p21 with type 1 diabetes, but not with type 2 diabetes, suggested that these disease entities were of different genetic background and pathogenesis. The discovery that some individuals with diabetes had autoantibodies in their blood provided additional evidence that type 1 diabetes had an autoimmune origin. Recently, increasing knowledge of the genome, coupled with rapidly improving genotyping technology and availability of increasingly large numbers of samples, has enabled statistically robust, systematic, genome-wide examinations for discovery of loci contributing to type 1 diabetes susceptibility, including within the MHC itself. Currently, there are over 50 non-HLA regions that significantly affect the risk for type 1 diabetes (http://www.t1dbase.org). Many of these regions contain interesting, but previously unrecognized, candidate genes. A few regions contain genes of unknown function or no known annotated genes, suggesting roles for long-distance gene regulatory effects, noncoding RNAs, or unknown mechanisms. Against a background of ever-improving knowledge of the genome, particularly its transcriptional regulation, and with massive advances in sequencing, specific genes, rather than regions that impinge upon type 1 diabetes risk, will be identified soon. Here we discuss follow-up strategies for genome-wide association (GWA) studies, causality of candidate genes, and genetic association in a bioinformatics approach with the anticipation that this knowledge will permit identification of the earliest events in type 1 diabetes etiology that could be targets for intervention or biomarkers for monitoring the effects and outcomes of potential therapeutic agents. The International Type 1 Diabetes Genetics Consortium (T1DGC) has established significant resources for the study of genetics of type 1 diabetes. These resources are available to the research community and provide a basis for future discovery in the transition from gene mapping to discovery of disease mechanisms. The T1DGC (http://www.t1dgc.org) is an …

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/db10-0076

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 84 references

Cited by

See all 300

Metadata

Authors
Pociot, F., Akolkar, B., Concannon, P., Erlich, H. A., Julier, C., Morahan, G., Nierras, C. R., Todd, J. A., Rich, S. S., & Nerup, J.
Venue
Diabetes
Published
2010-07-01
Volume
59
Issue
7
Pages
1561-1571
ISSN
  • 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-327X
OpenAlex
W2123367066
Cited by
300
References
84
FWCI
14.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genetics of Type 1 Diabetes: What's Next? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/db10-0076
The paper
Pociot, F., Akolkar, B., Concannon, P., Erlich, H. A., Julier, C., Morahan, G., Nierras, C. R., Todd, J. A., Rich, S. S., & Nerup, J. (2010). Genetics of Type 1 Diabetes: What's Next? Diabetes. https://doi.org/10.2337/db10-0076

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.