The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Transcriptome Analysis of Human Diabetic Kidney Disease
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is the single leading cause of kidney failure in the U.S., for which a cure has not yet been found. The aim of our study was to provide an unbiased catalog of gene-expression changes in human diabetic kidney biopsy samples. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Affymetrix expression arrays were used to identify differentially regulated transcripts in 44 microdissected human kidney samples. DKD samples were significant for their racial diversity and decreased glomerular filtration rate (~25–35 mL/min). Stringent statistical analysis, using the Benjamini-Hochberg corrected two-tailed t test, was used to identify differentially expressed transcripts in control and diseased glomeruli and tubuli. Two different web-based algorithms were used to define differentially regulated pathways. RESULTS: We identified 1,700 differentially expressed probesets in DKD glomeruli and 1,831 in diabetic tubuli, and 330 probesets were commonly differentially expressed in both compartments. Pathway analysis highlighted the regulation of Ras homolog gene family member A, Cdc42, integrin, integrin-linked kinase, and vascular endothelial growth factor signaling in DKD glomeruli. The tubulointerstitial compartment showed strong enrichment for inflammation-related pathways. The canonical complement signaling pathway was determined to be statistically differentially regulated in both DKD glomeruli and tubuli and was associated with increased glomerulosclerosis even in a different set of DKD samples. CONCLUSIONS: Our studies have cataloged gene-expression regulation and identified multiple novel genes and pathways that may play a role in the pathogenesis of DKD or could serve as biomarkers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2007) · American Journal of Kidney Diseases · doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2006.12.005 · Cited by 1,788
Cited by
Kang, H. M., Ahn, S. H., Choi, P., Ko, Y.-A., Han, S. H., Chinga, F., Park, A. S. D., Tao, J., Sharma, K., Pullman, J., et al. (2015) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.3762 · Cited by 1,555
Self-citationUnraveling the Role of Inflammation in the Pathogenesis of Diabetic Kidney Disease
Matoba, K., Takeda, Y., Nagai, Y., Kawanami, D., Utsunomiya, K., & Nishimura, R. (2019) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms20143393 · Cited by 223
Ko, Y.-A., Mohtat, D., Suzuki, M., Park, A. S. D., Izquierdo, M. C., Han, S. Y., Kang, H. M., Si, H., Hostetter, T., Pullman, J. M., et al. (2013) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2013-14-10-r108 · Cited by 225
Self-citationLiu, A., Trairatphisan, P., Gjerga, E., Didangelos, A., Barratt, J., & Saez-Rodriguez, J. (2019) · npj Systems Biology and Applications · doi:10.1038/s41540-019-0118-z · Cited by 151
Immune responses in diabetic nephropathy: Pathogenic mechanisms and therapeutic target
Chen, J., Liu, Q., He, J., & Li, Y. (2022) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2022.958790 · Cited by 164
Metadata
- Authors
- Woroniecka, K. I., Park, A. S. D., Mohtat, D., Thomas, D. B., Pullman, J. M., & Susztak, K.
- Venue
- Diabetes
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 2011-08-20
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2354-2369
- ISSN
- 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-327X
- OpenAlex
- W2128160632
- Cited by
- 642
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transcriptome Analysis of Human Diabetic Kidney Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/db10-1181
- The paper
- Woroniecka, K. I., Park, A. S. D., Mohtat, D., Thomas, D. B., Pullman, J. M., & Susztak, K. (2011). Transcriptome Analysis of Human Diabetic Kidney Disease. Diabetes. https://doi.org/10.2337/db10-1181
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.