Cited by 143Diabetes and associated disordersGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies

Genetic Analysis of Adult-Onset Autoimmune Diabetes

Open access
Howson, Joanna M.M., Rosinger, Silke, Smyth, Deborah J., Boehm, Bernhard O., the ADBW-END Study Group, Todd, John A.·2011·Diabetes

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In contrast with childhood-onset type 1 diabetes, the genetics of autoimmune diabetes in adults are not well understood. We have therefore investigated the genetics of diabetes diagnosed in adults positive for autoantibodies. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: GAD autoantibodies (GADAs), insulinoma-associated antigen-2 antibodies (IA-2As), and islet cell autoantibodies were measured at time of diagnosis. Autoantibody-positive diabetic subjects (n = 1,384) and population-based control subjects (n = 2,235) were genotyped at 20 childhood-onset type 1 diabetes loci and FCRL3, GAD2, TCF7L2, and FTO. RESULTS: PTPN22 (1p13.2), STAT4 (2q32.2), CTLA4 (2q33.2), HLA (6p21), IL2RA (10p15.1), INS (11p15.5), ERBB3 (12q13.2), SH2B3 (12q24.12), and CLEC16A (16p13.13) were convincingly associated with autoimmune diabetes in adults (P ≤ 0.002), with consistent directions of effect as reported for pediatric type 1 diabetes. No evidence of an HLA-DRB1*03/HLA-DRB1*04 (DR3/4) genotype effect was obtained (P = 0.55), but it remained highly predisposing (odds ratio 26.22). DR3/4 was associated with a lower age at diagnosis of disease, as was DR4 (P = 4.67 × 10−6) but not DR3. DR3 was associated with GADA positivity (P = 6.03 × 10−6) but absence of IA-2A (P = 3.22 × 10−7). DR4 was associated with IA-2A positivity (P = 5.45 × 10−6). CONCLUSIONS: Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that the genetics of autoimmune diabetes in adults and children are differentiated by only relatively few age-dependent genetic effects. The slower progression toward autoimmune insulin deficiency in adults is probably due to a lower genetic load overall combined with subtle variation in the HLA class II gene associations and autoreactivity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/db11-0364

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Compared with childhood-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus, adult-onset disease has a lower frequency of high-risk HLA types, lower concordance rates in twins, more protective genotypes, lower genetic risk scores and lower overall genetic load.

    “Evidence suggests that, compared with childhood-onset T1DM, adult-onset (ages ≥18 years) disease has a lower frequency of high-risk HLA types54, lower concordance rates in twins55, more protective genotypes56, lower genetic risk scores57 and lower overall genetic load (with minor differences in HLA class II gene associations)56.”

    From The epidemiology of type 1 diabetes mellitus in older adults (2025) · cites this paper as [54]

  • A 2011 study of adult-onset type 1 diabetes suggested that autoimmune type 1 diabetes in children and adults differs by just a few age-dependent genetic effects.

    “A 2011 study of adult-onset type 1 diabetes suggested that autoimmune type 1 diabetes in children and adults differs by just a few age-dependent genetic effects;48”

    From Type 1 diabetes (2014) · cites this paper as [48]

  • This mechanism might help explain the differing rates of progression to type 1 diabetes in adults versus children, where only minor variations in genetic susceptibility have been noted.

    “This mechanism might help explain the differing rates of progression to type 1 diabetes in adults versus children, where only minor variations in genetic susceptibility have been noted.48”

    From Type 1 diabetes (2014) · cites this paper as [48]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. [1]Barrett JC Clayton DG Concannon P; Type 1 Diabetes Genetics Consortium Genome-wide association study and meta-analysis find that over 40 loci affect risk of type 1 diabetes. Nat Genet 2009; 41: 703– 707 19430480 PMC2889014
  2. [2]Leslie RD Predicting adult-onset autoimmune diabetes: clarity from complexity. Diabetes 2010; 59: 330– 331 20103711 PMC2809976
  3. [3]Rolandsson O Palmer JP Latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA) is dead: long live autoimmune diabetes! Diabetologia 2010; 53: 1250– 1253 20336277
  4. [4]Steck AK Eisenbarth GS Genetic similarities between latent autoimmune diabetes and type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 2008; 57: 1160– 1162 18443373
  5. [5]Caillat-Zucman S Garchon HJ Timsit J Age-dependent HLA genetic heterogeneity of type 1 insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Clin Invest 1992; 90: 2242– 2250 1469084 PMC443375
  6. [6]Desai M Zeggini E Horton VA An association analysis of the HLA gene region in latent autoimmune diabetes in adults. Diabetologia 2007; 50: 68– 73 17143607 PMC3076207
  7. [7]Horton V Stratton I Bottazzo GF; UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group Genetic heterogeneity of autoimmune diabetes: age of presentation in adults is influenced by HLA DRB1 and DQB1 genotypes (UKPDS 43). Diabetologia 1999; 42: 608– 616 10333055
  8. [8]Clayton DG Prediction and interaction in complex disease genetics: experience in type 1 diabetes. PLoS Genet 2009; 5: e1000540 19584936 PMC2703795
  9. [10]Desai M Zeggini E Horton VA The variable number of tandem repeats upstream of the insulin gene is a susceptibility locus for latent autoimmune diabetes in adults. Diabetes 2006; 55: 1890– 1894 16731859
  10. [11]Durinovic-Belló I Wu RP Gersuk VH Sanda S Shilling HG Nepom GT Insulin gene VNTR genotype associates with frequency and phenotype of the autoimmune response to proinsulin. Genes Immun 2010; 11: 188– 193 20054344 PMC2845516
  11. [12]Howson JM Dunger DB Nutland S Stevens H Wicker LS Todd JA A type 1 diabetes subgroup with a female bias is characterised by failure in tolerance to thyroid peroxidase at an early age and a strong association with the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 gene. Diabetologia 2007; 50: 741– 746 17334650 PMC2387192
  12. [13]Plagnol V, Howson JMM, Smyth DJ, et al. Genetic analysis of autoantibody positivity in Graves' disease and type 1 diabetes. PLoS Genet 2011;7:e1002216 PMC3150451 21829393
  13. [14]Pettersen E Skorpen F Kvaløy K Midthjell K Grill V Genetic heterogeneity in latent autoimmune diabetes is linked to various degrees of autoimmune activity: results from the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study. Diabetes 2010; 59: 302– 310 19833889 PMC2797937
  14. [15]Voight BF Scott LJ Steinthorsdottir V; MAGIC investigators; GIANT Consortium Twelve type 2 diabetes susceptibility loci identified through large-scale association analysis. Nat Genet 2010; 42: 579– 589 20581827 PMC3080658
  15. [16]Kochi Y Yamada R Suzuki A A functional variant in FCRL3, encoding Fc receptor-like 3, is associated with rheumatoid arthritis and several autoimmunities. Nat Genet 2005; 37: 478– 485 15838509 PMC1362949
  16. [17]Owen CJ Kelly H Eden JA Merriman ME Pearce SH Merriman TR Analysis of the Fc receptor-like-3 (FCRL3) locus in Caucasians with autoimmune disorders suggests a complex pattern of disease association. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007; 92: 1106– 1111 17200162
  17. [18]Simmonds MJ Heward JM Carr-Smith J Foxall H Franklyn JA Gough SC Contribution of single nucleotide polymorphisms within FCRL3 and MAP3K7IP2 to the pathogenesis of Graves’ disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006; 91: 1056– 1061 16384851
  18. [20]Boehm BO Manfras B Seissler J Epidemiology and immunogenetic background of islet cell antibody–positive nondiabetic schoolchildren: Ulm-Frankfurt population study. Diabetes 1991; 40: 1435– 1439 1936604
  19. [21]Powell M Prentice L Asawa T Glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibody assay using 125I-labelled recombinant GAD65 produced in yeast. Clin Chim Acta 1996; 256: 175– 188 9027428
  20. [22]Endl J Rosinger S Schwarz B Coexpression of CD25 and OX40 (CD134) receptors delineates autoreactive T-cells in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 2006; 55: 50– 60 16380476
  21. [23]Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls. Nature 2007; 447: 661– 678 17554300 PMC2719288
  22. [24]Skol AD Scott LJ Abecasis GR Boehnke M Joint analysis is more efficient than replication-based analysis for two-stage genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet 2006; 38: 209– 213 16415888
  23. [26]Saxena R Gianniny L Burtt NP Common single nucleotide polymorphisms in TCF7L2 are reproducibly associated with type 2 diabetes and reduce the insulin response to glucose in nondiabetic individuals. Diabetes 2006; 55: 2890– 2895 17003358
  24. [27]Bakhtadze E Cervin C Lindholm E Common variants in the TCF7L2 gene help to differentiate autoimmune from non-autoimmune diabetes in young (15-34 years) but not in middle-aged (40-59 years) diabetic patients. Diabetologia 2008; 51: 2224– 2232 18839133
  25. [28]Raj SM Howson JMM Walker NM No association of multiple type 2 diabetes loci with type 1 diabetes. Diabetologia 2009; 52: 2109– 2116 19455305 PMC2738846
  26. [29]Long SA, Cerosaletti K, Wan JY, Ho JC, Tatum M, Wei S, et al. An autoimmune-associated variant in PTPN2 reveals an impairment of IL-2R signaling in CD4(+) T cells. Genes Immun 2011;12:116–125 PMC3058680 21179116
  27. [30]Maue AC Yager EJ Swain SL Woodland DL Blackman MA Haynes L T-cell immunosenescence: lessons learned from mouse models of aging. Trends Immunol 2009; 30: 301– 305 19541537 PMC3755270
  28. [31]Yamanouchi J Rainbow D Serra P Interleukin-2 gene variation impairs regulatory T cell function and causes autoimmunity. Nat Genet 2007; 39: 329– 337 17277778 PMC2886969
  29. [32]Long SA Cerosaletti K Bollyky PL Defects in IL-2R signaling contribute to diminished maintenance of FOXP3 expression in CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T-cells of type 1 diabetic subjects. Diabetes 2010; 59: 407– 415 19875613 PMC2809970
  30. [33]Howson JMM Stevens H Smyth DJ Evidence that HLA class I and II associations with type 1 diabetes, autoantibodies to GAD and autoantibodies to IA-2, are distinct. Diabetes 2011;60:2635–2644 PMC3178284 21831970
  31. [34]Vandewalle CL Falorni A Lernmark A Associations of GAD65- and IA-2- autoantibodies with genetic risk markers in new-onset IDDM patients and their siblings. The Belgian Diabetes Registry. Diabetes Care 1997; 20: 1547– 1552 9314633
  32. [35]Duchatelet S Caillat-Zucman S Dubois-Laforgue D Blanc H Timsit J Julier C FCRL3 -169CT functional polymorphism in type 1 diabetes and autoimmunity traits. Biomed Pharmacother 2008; 62: 153– 157 17961971
  33. [36]Turunen JA Wessman M Kilpikari R Parkkonen M Forsblom C Groop PH; FinnDiane Study Group The functional variant -169C/T in the FCRL3 gene does not increase susceptibility to type 1 diabetes. Diabet Med 2006; 23: 925– 927 16911635
  34. [37]Patterson CC Dahlquist GG Gyürüs E Green A Soltész G; EURODIAB Study Group Incidence trends for childhood type 1 diabetes in Europe during 1989-2003 and predicted new cases 2005-20: a multicentre prospective registration study. Lancet 2009; 373: 2027– 2033 19481249
  35. [38]Smyth DJ Plagnol V Walker NM Shared and distinct genetic variants in type 1 diabetes and celiac disease. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 2767– 2777 19073967 PMC2840835
  36. [39]Fung EY Smyth DJ Howson JM Analysis of 17 autoimmune disease-associated variants in type 1 diabetes identifies 6q23/TNFAIP3 as a susceptibility locus. Genes Immun 2009; 10: 188– 191 19110536

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Howson, J. M. M., Rosinger, S., Smyth, D. J., Boehm, B. O., the ADBW-END Study Group, & Todd, J. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Universität Ulm (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Howson, Joanna M.M.
  • the ADBW-END Study Group
Venue
Diabetes
Published
2011-09-16
Volume
60
Issue
10
Pages
2645-2653
ISSN
  • 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-327X
OpenAlex
W2152149724
Cited by
143
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
FWCI
5.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation International
  • Wellcome Trust (091157, 079895)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0508-10275)
  • British Heart Foundation (RG/08/014/24067)
  • University of Cambridge
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB518, GrK1041)
  • Cambridge Institute for Medical Research, University of Cambridge (079895)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Keywords
glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies, IA-2 autoantibodies, islet autoantibodies, age at diagnosis, PTPN22, STAT4, CTLA-4, IL2RA, HLA class II
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Autoantibodies, Child, Child, Preschool, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Genotype, HLA Antigens, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Middle Aged, Age Distribution, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review