Cited by 91Diabetes and associated disordersT-cell and B-cell ImmunologyDiabetes Management and Research

Recent Lessons Learned From Prevention and Recent-Onset Type 1 Diabetes Immunotherapy Trials

Open access
Staeva, Teodora P., Chatenoud, Lucienne, Insel, Richard, Atkinson, Mark A.·2013·Diabetes

Abstract

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) results from the immune system’s misguided attack on insulin-producing pancreatic β-cells, leading to lifelong insulin replacement therapy as well as to the risk for developing disease-associated complications (1–3). Over the past 2–3 decades, the field of clinical research in T1D has seen tremendous growth, including evaluation of a variety of promising immunotherapy approaches for the prevention or reversal of the disorder (4–6). In just the past 2 years, data from >10 trials have been reported, some revealing promising phase II results. However, phase III trials have failed to demonstrate efficacy. In light of these results, an anxiety-provoked question has arisen: Where does the field go from here? To this end, this article presents and elaborates on key emerging questions and recommendations for future immunotherapy trials in T1D. If implemented successfully, such strategies could accelerate the development of therapies with tangible clinical benefit in T1D because they perhaps more appropriately address the complex nature of the disease. Nearly 30 years after the first immunotherapy clinical trials in type 1 diabetes (T1D), progress has been realized. This progress includes advancements in scientific knowledge (e.g., immune markers, metabolic testing, pathogenesis), the breadth of agents under investigation (Fig. 1), and how clinical trials are increasingly performed as part of major collaborative networks with uniform protocols often bolstered with mechanistic assays. However, shortcomings remain in demonstrating a degree of therapeutic efficacy for recent-onset T1D immunotherapies that is sufficiently robust in terms of risk/benefit to satisfy the requirements for drug registration and approval by regulatory agencies (i.e., Food and Drug Administration, European Medicines Agency). In 2011 and early 2012 after a number of phase I and II recent-onset clinical trials, a series of phase IIB and III recent-onset T1D trials reported their outcomes (7–10). In advance …

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/db12-0562

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Type 1 diabetes is much more resistant than initially expected to therapeutic interventions with conventional or experimental agents, whether the goal is disease prevention or reversal.

    “Type 1 diabetes has proven to be much more resistant than initially expected to therapeutic interventions with conventional or experimental agents, whether the goal is disease prevention or reversal.152”

    From Type 1 diabetes (2014) · cites this paper as [152]

    The paper’s opening section says that immunotherapies pursued for prevention or reversal showed promising phase II results, but phase III trials failed to demonstrate efficacy. Its discussion of recent-onset treatment also describes benefits that were temporary or limited by toxicity. Our copy does not establish the same degree of resistance for prevention interventions or for conventional and experimental agents generally. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [12]Andromeda announces phase III clinical study with DiaPep277, a novel immunotherapeutic agent for type 1 diabetes, met primary endpoint [press release]. November 22, 2011
  2. [38]Tolerx Inc. Tolerx and GlaxoSmithKline announce phase 3 DEFEND-1 study of otelixizumab in type 1 diabetes did not meet its primary endpoint [press release]. March 12, 2011
  3. [55]Osiris Therapeutics provides update on groundbreaking stem cell trial for type 1 diabetes [press release]. January 3, 2012

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Staeva, T. P., Chatenoud, L., Insel, R., & Atkinson, M. A.
Affiliations
  • Breakthrough T1D (US)
  • Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades (FR)
  • University of Florida Health (US)
Corresponding author
Atkinson, Mark A.
Venue
Diabetes
Published
2012-12-13
Volume
62
Issue
1
Pages
9-17
ISSN
  • 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-327X
OpenAlex
W2132051812
Cited by
91
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, immunotherapy, recent-onset type 1 diabetes, clinical trial design, phase III trial failure, drug approval, regulatory requirements, immunological markers
MeSH terms
Autoantigens, Clinical Trials as Topic, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Humans, Immunosuppressive Agents, Immunotherapy, Research Design, Insulin-Secreting Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review