The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Long-Term Outcome and Disability of Diabetic Patients Hospitalized for Diabetic Foot Ulcers
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE—The long-term outcome and functional status of subjects hospitalized for diabetic foot ulcers have been poorly studied and thus are the topics of this study. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Ninety-four consecutive diabetic subjects hospitalized for diabetic foot ulcers between January 1998 and December 2000 were prospectively followed for mean ± SD 79.5 ± 13.3 months. We calculated rates of primary healing, new ulcers, amputations, mortality, and disability and evaluated the global therapeutic success (GTS) of foot care management as defined by the association of primary healing without recurrence or disability at the end of follow-up. RESULTS—Follow-up was successful in 89 of 94 subjects (63 men and 31 women; age 63.7 ± 10.8 years). Of these, 69 (77.5%) experienced primary healing without major amputation, 39 (43.8%) underwent amputation (24 minor and 15 major), and 46 died (51.7%), including 23 from cardiovascular events. Forty-two of 69 patients who experienced primary healing (60.9%) had ulcer recurrence. At the end of the follow-up period, 25 patients (28.1%) were dependent and 40 subjects (44.9%) had achieved GTS. Multivariate analysis showed the role of age as an independent predictor of GTS (P < 0.05) and of impaired renal function/albuminuria as independent predictors of healing failure, first amputation, and mortality (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS—Despite a satisfactory initial healing rate, the global long-term outcome of patients hospitalized for diabetic foot ulcers was poor. Nephropathy appears to be an important predictor of long-term outcome. Further studies are needed to establish recognized criteria for therapeutic success going beyond just the evaluation of healing rate in the management of diabetic foot ulcers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Diabetic foot ulcers and their recurrence
Armstrong, D. G., Boulton, A. J. M., & Bus, S. A. (2017) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1615439 · Cited by 4,376
Human skin wounds: A major and snowballing threat to public health and the economy
Sen, C. K., Gordillo, G. M., Roy, S., Kirsner, R., Lambert, L., Hunt, T. K., Gottrup, F., Gurtner, G. C., & Longaker, M. T. (2009) · Wound Repair and Regeneration · doi:10.1111/j.1524-475x.2009.00543.x · Cited by 2,965
Etiology, Epidemiology, and Disparities in the Burden of Diabetic Foot Ulcers
McDermott, K., Fang, M., Boulton, A. J. M., Selvin, E., & Hicks, C. W. (2023) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dci22-0043 · Cited by 1,255
Jupiter, D. C., Thorud, J. C., Buckley, C. J., & Shibuya, N. (2016) · International Wound Journal · doi:10.1111/iwj.12404 · Cited by 340
Thorud, J. C., Plemmons, B., Buckley, C. J., Shibuya, N., & Jupiter, D. C. (2016) · The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery · doi:10.1053/j.jfas.2016.01.012 · Cited by 331
Metadata
- Authors
- Ghanassia, E., Villon, L., Thuan dit Dieudonné, J.-F., Boegner, C., Avignon, A., & Sultan, A.
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 2008-07-01
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1288-1292
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- OpenAlex
- W2112028843
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long-Term Outcome and Disability of Diabetic Patients Hospitalized for Diabetic Foot Ulcers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/dc07-2145
- The paper
- Ghanassia, E., Villon, L., Thuan dit Dieudonné, J.-F., Boegner, C., Avignon, A., & Sultan, A. (2008). Long-Term Outcome and Disability of Diabetic Patients Hospitalized for Diabetic Foot Ulcers. Diabetes Care. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc07-2145
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.