Cited by 35Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Management and EducationPatient Safety and Medication Errors

Safety of Nighttime 2-Hour Suspension of Basal Insulin in Pump-Treated Type 1 Diabetes Even in the Absence of Low Glucose

Open access
Sherr, Jennifer L., Palau Collazo, Miladys, Cengiz, Eda, Michaud, Camille, Carria, Lori, Steffen, Amy T., Weyman, Kate, Zgorski, Melinda +3 more·2014·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: An integrated sensor-augmented pump system has been introduced that interrupts basal insulin infusion for 2 h if patients fail to respond to low-glucose alarms. It has been suggested that such interruptions of basal insulin due to falsely low glucose levels detected by sensor could lead to diabetic ketoacidosis. We hypothesized that random suspension of basal insulin for 2 h in the overnight period would not lead to clinically important increases in blood β-hydroxybutyrate levels despite widely varying glucose values prior to the suspension. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Subjects measured blood glucose and blood β-hydroxybutyrate levels using a meter each night at 9:00 p.m., then fasted until the next morning. On control nights, the usual basal rates were continued; on experimental nights, the basal insulin infusion was reprogrammed for a 2-h zero basal rate at random times after 11:30 p.m. RESULTS: In 17 type 1 diabetic subjects (mean age 24 ± 9 years, diabetes duration 14 ± 11 years, A1C level 7.3 ± 0.5% [56 mmol/mol]), blood glucose and blood β-hydroxybutyrate levels were similar at 9:00 p.m. on suspend nights (144 ± 63 mg/dL and 0.09 ± 0.07 mmol/L) and nonsuspend nights (151 ± 65 mg/dL and 0.08 ± 0.06 mmol/L) (P = 0.39 and P = 0.47, respectively). Fasting morning blood glucose levels increased after suspend nights compared with nonsuspend nights (191 ± 68 vs. 141 ± 75 mg/dL, P < 0.0001), and the frequency of fasting hypoglycemia decreased the morning following suspend nights (P < 0.0001). Morning blood β-hydroxybutyrate levels were slightly higher after suspension (0.13 ± 0.14 vs. 0.09 ± 0.11 mmol/L, P = 0.053), but the difference was not clinically important. CONCLUSIONS: Systems that suspend basal insulin for 2 h are safe and do not lead to clinically significant ketonemia even if the blood glucose level is elevated at the time of the suspension.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc13-1608

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When an insulin pump is shut off, blood glucose level rises by approximately 1 mg/dl/minute for the first 30 minutes of occlusion.

    “Zisser demonstrated in 2008 that when an insulin pump is shut off blood glucose level rises by approximately 1 mg/dl/minute for the first 30 minutes of occlusion.”

    From Insulin Pump Occlusions: For Patients Who Have Been Around the (Infusion) Block (2017) · cites this paper as [12]

    The Results report that sensor glucose rose by 18 ± 58 mg/dL over a two-hour pump suspension, supporting a rise after insulin delivery stops. The paper does not report a rise of approximately 1 mg/dL per minute during the first 30 minutes of occlusion or attribute that finding to Zisser in 2008. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • By extrapolation assuming that the relationship of glucose increase to time without insulin remains linear, an occlusion typically does not lead to an alarm until the glucose level has risen by approximately 120-240 mg/dl.

    “By extrapolation assuming that the relationship of glucose increase to time without insulin remains linear, then an occlusion typically does not lead to an alarm until the glucose level has risen by approximately 120-240 mg/dl.12”

    From Insulin Pump Occlusions: For Patients Who Have Been Around the (Infusion) Block (2017) · cites this paper as [12]

    The Results report that sensor glucose rose during and after a 2-hour suspension of basal insulin, providing some basis for an extrapolation about time without insulin. The paper does not establish a linear relationship or report when an occlusion alarm occurs, so it does not support the claimed 120–240 mg/dL rise before an alarm. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.81)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Occlusion of an insulin infusion set can massively interfere with glycemic control in patients with diabetes.

    “an occlusion of IIS can massively interfere with glycemic control”

    From Insulin Pump Occlusions: For Patients Who Have Been Around the (Infusion) Block (2017) · cites this paper as [12]

    The Results (page unavailable) show that a planned two-hour suspension of basal insulin raised mean fasting glucose by 50 mg/dL in people with type 1 diabetes. The paper does not study infusion-set occlusion, and its limited suspension results do not establish that occlusion can massively interfere with glycemic control. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. [1]Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 977– 986 8366922
  2. [2]Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group Effect of intensive diabetes treatment on the development and progression of long-term complications in adolescents with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. J Pediatr 1994; 125: 177– 188 8040759
  3. [3]Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group Effect of intensive therapy on residual beta-cell function in patients with type 1 diabetes in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 1998; 128: 517– 523 9518395
  4. [4]Nixon R Pickup JC Fear of hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetes managed by continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion: is it associated with poor glycemic control? Diabetes Technol Ther 2011; 13: 93– 98 21284474
  5. [6]Bolli G de Feo P Compagnucci P Abnormal glucose counterregulation in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Interaction of anti-insulin antibodies and impaired glucagon and epinephrine secretion. Diabetes 1983; 32: 134– 141 6337896
  6. [8]Jones TW Porter P Sherwin RS Decreased epinephrine responses to hypoglycemia during sleep. N Engl J Med 1998; 338: 1657– 1662 9614256
  7. [9]Banarer S Cryer PE Sleep-related hypoglycemia-associated autonomic failure in type 1 diabetes: reduced awakening from sleep during hypoglycemia. Diabetes 2003; 52: 1195– 1203 12716752
  8. [10]Tsalikian E Mauras N Beck RW Diabetes Research In Children Network Direcnet Study Group Impact of exercise on overnight glycemic control in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus. J Pediatr 2005; 147: 528– 534 16227041 PMC2258153
  9. [11]Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study Group Prolonged nocturnal hypoglycemia is common during 12 months of continuous glucose monitoring in children and adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2010; 33: 1004– 1008 20200306 PMC2858162
  10. [12]Buckingham B Wilson DM Lecher T Hanas R Kaiserman K Cameron F Duration of nocturnal hypoglycemia before seizures. Diabetes Care 2008; 31: 2110– 2112 18694975 PMC2571056
  11. [13]Ahern JA Boland EA Doane R Insulin pump therapy in pediatrics: a therapeutic alternative to safely lower HbA1c levels across all age groups. Pediatr Diabetes 2002; 3: 10– 15 15016169
  12. [14]Boland EA Grey M Oesterle A Fredrickson L Tamborlane WV Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion. A new way to lower risk of severe hypoglycemia, improve metabolic control, and enhance coping in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 1999; 22: 1779– 1784 10546007
  13. [15]Maniatis AK Klingensmith GJ Slover RH Mowry CJ Chase HP Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion therapy for children and adolescents: an option for routine diabetes care. Pediatrics 2001; 107: 351– 356 11158469
  14. [17]Sulli N Shashaj B Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in children and adolescents with diabetes mellitus: decreased HbA1c with low risk of hypoglycemia. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2003; 16: 393– 399 12705364
  15. [18]Willi SM Planton J Egede L Schwarz S Benefits of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in children with type 1 diabetes. J Pediatr 2003; 143: 796– 801 14657831
  16. [20]Hovorka R Allen JM Elleri D Manual closed-loop insulin delivery in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a phase 2 randomised crossover trial. Lancet 2010; 375: 743– 751 20138357
  17. [21]Weinzimer SA Steil GM Swan KL Dziura J Kurtz N Tamborlane WV Fully automated closed-loop insulin delivery versus semiautomated hybrid control in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes using an artificial pancreas. Diabetes Care 2008; 31: 934– 939 18252903
  18. [22]Weinzimer SA Sherr JL Cengiz E Effect of pramlintide on prandial glycemic excursions during closed-loop control in adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2012; 35: 1994– 1999 22815298 PMC3447854
  19. [23]El-Khatib FH Russell SJ Nathan DM Sutherlin RG Damiano ER A bihormonal closed-loop artificial pancreas for type 1 diabetes. Sci Transl Med 2010; 2: 27ra27 20393188 PMC4242106
  20. [24]Russell SJ El-Khatib FH Nathan DM Magyar KL Jiang J Damiano ER Blood glucose control in type 1 diabetes with a bihormonal bionic endocrine pancreas. Diabetes Care 2012; 35: 2148– 2155 22923666 PMC3476884
  21. [25]Renard E Place J Cantwell M Chevassus H Palerm CC Closed-loop insulin delivery using a subcutaneous glucose sensor and intraperitoneal insulin delivery: feasibility study testing a new model for the artificial pancreas. Diabetes Care 2010; 33: 121– 127 19846796 PMC2797956
  22. [26]Kovatchev B Cobelli C Renard E Multinational study of subcutaneous model-predictive closed-loop control in type 1 diabetes mellitus: summary of the results. J Diabetes Sci Tech 2010; 4: 1374– 1381 21129332 PMC3005047
  23. [27]Castle JR Engle JM El Youssef J Novel use of glucagon in a closed-loop system for prevention of hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2010; 33: 1282– 1287 20332355 PMC2875438
  24. [28]Nimri R Atlas E Ajzensztejn M Miller S Oron T Phillip M Feasibility study of automated overnight closed-loop glucose control under MD-logic artificial pancreas in patients with type 1 diabetes: the DREAM Project. Diabetes Technol Ther 2012; 14: 728– 735 22853723
  25. [29]Ward WK Castle JR El Youssef J Safe glycemic management during closed-loop treatment of type 1 diabetes: the role of glucagon, use of multiple sensors, and compensation for stress hyperglycemia. J Diabetes Sci Tech 2011; 5: 1373– 1380 22226254 PMC3262703
  26. [31]Agrawal P Welsh JB Kannard B Askari S Yang Q Kaufman FR Usage and effectiveness of the low glucose suspend feature of the Medtronic Paradigm Veo insulin pump. J Diabetes Sci Tech 2011; 5: 1137– 1141 22027306 PMC3208869
  27. [32]Danne T Kordonouri O Holder M Prevention of hypoglycemia by using low glucose suspend function in sensor-augmented pump therapy. Diabetes Technol Ther 2011; 13: 1129– 1134 21827318
  28. [33]Choudhary P Shin J Wang Y Insulin pump therapy with automated insulin suspension in response to hypoglycemia: reduction in nocturnal hypoglycemia in those at greatest risk. Diabetes Care 2011; 34: 2023– 2025 21868778 PMC3161284
  29. [34]Ly TT Nicholas JA Retterath A Davis EA Jones TW Analysis of glucose responses to automated insulin suspension with sensor-augmented pump therapy. Diabetes Care 2012; 35: 1462– 1465 22584133 PMC3379608
  30. [35]Bergenstal RM Klonoff DC Garg SK ASPIRE In-Home Study Group Threshold-based insulin-pump interruption for reduction of hypoglycemia. N Engl J Med 2013; 369: 224– 232 23789889
  31. [36]Ly TT Nicholas JA Retterath A Lim EM Davis EA Jones TW Effect of sensor-augmented insulin pump therapy and automated insulin suspension vs. standard insulin pump therapy on hypoglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2013; 310: 1240– 1247 24065010
  32. [37]Attia N Jones TW Holcombe J Tamborlane WV Comparison of human regular and lispro insulins after interruption of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and in the treatment of acutely decompensated IDDM. Diabetes Care 1998; 21: 817– 821 9589247

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sherr, J. L., Palau Collazo, M., Cengiz, E., Michaud, C., Carria, L., Steffen, A. T., Weyman, K., Zgorski, M., Tichy, E., Tamborlane, W. V., & Weinzimer, S. A.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • Department of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
Corresponding author
Sherr, Jennifer L.
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2014-02-11
Volume
37
Issue
3
Pages
773-779
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2127177370
Cited by
35
References
5
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8
FWCI
3.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K12DK094714, P30DK045735)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR024139)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, continuous glucose monitoring, sensor-augmented pump, diabetic ketoacidosis, beta-hydroxybutyrate, ketonemia, hypoglycemia, fasting blood glucose, insulin pump therapy
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Insulin Infusion Systems, Male, Middle Aged, Time Factors, Diabetic Ketoacidosis, 3-Hydroxybutyric Acid, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review