Cited by 93Metabolism, Diabetes, and CancerDiabetes Treatment and ManagementPancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research

Metformin and Cancer: Mounting Evidence Against an Association

Open access
Suissa, Samy, Azoulay, Laurent·2014·Diabetes Care

Abstract

Metformin, a biguanide derived from the French lilac, has become the preferred first-line therapy for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (1). This drug is inexpensive, has an excellent safety profile, and can be safely combined with other antidiabetes agents (2). As a result, it has become the most widely prescribed antidiabetes drug worldwide. In addition to metformin’s well-established antidiabetes effects, there has been considerable interest in its antitumor properties. Such interest started from a short report of an observational study published in 2005 that suggested that the use of metformin was associated with a 23% decreased risk of any cancer (3). Since then, a large number of observational studies have been published with several “corroborating” a possible decreased incidence of cancer with this drug (4). In parallel, several laboratory studies have also suggested that metformin has antineoplastic activity, although doses used in such experiments were typically higher than the conventional doses used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes (5). Nonetheless, this apparent convergence of evidence from both observational and laboratory studies has led some to call for large randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of metformin in cancer prevention and treatment (6–9). However, a careful assessment of the observational studies conducted to date point to some important time-related biases that systematically exaggerated the reported antitumor effects of metformin (10). Time-related biases, such as immortal time bias, time window bias, and time lag bias, have been previously described in studies of diabetes treatment (10) and in other therapeutic areas (11–14). These biases result from not properly classifying exposure during the follow-up of a cohort study or from …

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc14-0500

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Suissa, S., & Azoulay, L.
Affiliations
Jewish General Hospital (CA)
Corresponding author
Suissa, Samy
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2014-06-12
Volume
37
Issue
7
Pages
1786-1788
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2157655280
Cited by
93
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 3
FWCI
3.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Keywords
metformin, cancer risk, anticancer activity, type 2 diabetes, observational bias, immortal time bias, cancer prevention, biguanides
MeSH terms
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Male, Metformin, Sulfonylurea Compounds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review