Cited by 130Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesDiabetes Treatment and ManagementHeart Failure Treatment and Management

Ambulatory blood pressure reduction with SGLT-2 inhibitors: dose-response meta-analysis and comparative evaluation with low-dose hydrochlorothiazide

Open access
Georgianos, Panagiotis I., Agarwal, Rajiv·2019·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Sodium–glucose cotransporter (SGLT)-2 inhibitors lower clinic and ambulatory blood pressure (BP), possibly through their natriuretic action. However, it remains unclear whether this BP-lowering effect is dose dependent and different from that of low-dose hydrochlorothiazide. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to quantify the association of the dose with response of ambulatory BP to SGLT-2 inhibition and to provide comparative evaluation with low-dose hydrochlorothiazide. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane database of clinical trials from inception of each database through 22 August 2018. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting treatment effects of SGLT-2 inhibitors on ambulatory BP. We extracted data on the mean difference between the active treatment and placebo groups in change from baseline (CFB) of ambulatory systolic and diastolic BP. RESULTS: We identified seven RCTs (involving 2,381 participants) comparing SGLT-2 inhibitors with placebo. Of these, two RCTs included low-dose hydrochlorothiazide as active comparator. CFB in 24-h systolic BP between SGLT-2 inhibitor and placebo groups was −3.62 mmHg (95% CI −4.29, −2.94) and in diastolic BP was −1.70 mmHg (95% CI −2.13, −1.26). BP lowering with SGLT-2 inhibition was more potent during daytime than during nighttime. The CFB in ambulatory BP was comparable between low-dose and high-dose subgroups and was similar to that for low-dose hydrochlorothiazide. Eligible RCTs did not evaluate cardiovascular outcomes/mortality. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis shows that SGLT-2 inhibitors provoke an average reduction of systolic/diastolic BP 3.62/1.70 mmHg in 24-h ambulatory BP. This BP-lowering effect remains unmodified regardless of the dose of SGLT-2 inhibitor and is comparable with BP-lowering efficacy of low-dose hydrochlorothiazide.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc18-2207

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A recent meta-analysis including seven randomized controlled trials demonstrated that SGLT2 inhibitors were associated with an average reduction of 3.6/1.7 mmHg systolic/diastolic in 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure, comparable with efficacy of low-dose hydrochlorothiazide.

    “A recent meta-analysis including seven RCTs demonstrated that SGLT2 inhibitors were associated with an average reduction of 3.6/1.7 mmHg (systolic/diastolic) in 24 h ambulatory BP, which is comparable with efficacy of low-dose hydrochlorothiazide.”
  • Similar findings have been reported in short-term trials of other SGLT2 inhibitors, and longer-term blood pressure-lowering effects in type 2 diabetes with relatively preserved kidney function have been demonstrated in large cardiovascular outcome trials.

    “Similar findings have been reported in short-term trials of other SGLT2 inhibitors, 6,18,19 and the longer-term BP lowering effects of SGLT2 inhibitors in individuals with T2DM and relatively preserved kidney function have been demonstrated in large cardiovascular outcome trials.5,20,21”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [10]10. Karg MV, Bosch A, Kannenkeril D, et al. SGLT2-inhibition with dapagli fl ozin reduces tissue sodium content: a randomised controlled trial. Cardiovasc Diabetol 2018;17:5

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Georgianos, P. I., & Agarwal, R.
Affiliations
  • Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
  • Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Agarwal, Rajiv
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2019-03-11
Volume
42
Issue
4
Pages
693-700
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2923754537
Cited by
130
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 4
FWCI
10.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
  • PMC
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
  • VA (5I01CX000829-04)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
Keywords
SGLT2 inhibitors, ambulatory blood pressure, blood pressure reduction, dose-response relationship, sodium excretion, diurnal blood pressure variation, antihypertensive drugs, systolic and diastolic blood pressure
MeSH terms
Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors, Blood Pressure, Humans, Hydrochlorothiazide, Hypertension, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review