Cited by 99Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and Education

15. Diabetes Advocacy: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2018

American Diabetes Association·2018·Diabetes Care

Abstract

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes" includes ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, a multidisciplinary expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations, please refer to the Standards of Care Introduction Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc18-s015

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
American Diabetes Association
Corresponding author
American Diabetes Association
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2017-11-24
Volume
41
Issue
Supplement_1
Pages
S152-S153
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W4237834786
Cited by
97
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 21
FWCI
13.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
Keywords
diabetes advocacy, clinical guidelines, quality of care, level of evidence, diabetes management guidelines
MeSH terms
Diabetes Mellitus, Humans, Patient Advocacy, Patient Rights

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review