Cited by 48Diabetes Treatment and ManagementChronic Disease Management StrategiesDiabetes Management and Research

Predicting 5- and 10-year mortality risk in older adults with diabetes

Open access
Griffith, Kevin N., Prentice, Julia C., Mohr, David C., Conlin, Paul R.·2020·Diabetes Care

Abstract

Objective Several diabetes clinical practice guidelines suggest that treatment goals may be modified in older adults on the basis of comorbidities, complications, and life expectancy. The long-term benefits of treatment intensification may not outweigh short-term risks for patients with limited life expectancy. Because of the uncertainty of determining life expectancy for individual patients, we sought to develop and validate prognostic indices for mortality in older adults with diabetes. Research design and methods We used a prevalence sample of veterans with diabetes who were aged ≥65 years on 1 January 2006 ( N = 275,190). Administrative data were queried for potential predictors that included patient demographics, comorbidities, procedure codes, laboratory values and anthropomorphic measurements, medication history, and previous health service utilization. Logistic least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regressions were used to identify variables independently associated with mortality. The resulting odds ratios were then weighted to create prognostic indices of mortality over 5 and 10 years. Results Thirty-seven predictors of mortality were identified: 4 demographic variables, prescriptions for insulin or sulfonylureas or blood pressure medications, 6 biomarkers, previous outpatient and inpatient utilization, and 22 comorbidities/procedures. The prognostic indices showed good discrimination, with C-statistics of 0.74 and 0.76 for 5- and 10-year mortality, respec…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc19-1870

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Multiple prognostic tools for life expectancy for older adults are available.

    “Multiple prognostic tools for life expectancy for older adults are available (60,61).”

    From 13. Older Adults: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 (2026) · cites this paper as [61]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Griffith, K. N., Prentice, J. C., Mohr, D. C., & Conlin, P. R.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Griffith, Kevin N.
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2020-06-19
Volume
43
Issue
8
Pages
1724-1731
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W3035880398
Cited by
48
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 1
FWCI
5.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Health Services Research and Development (IIR 15-116)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
diabetes mellitus, older adults, mortality prediction, prognostic score, life expectancy, treatment intensification, comorbidities, insulin, sulfonylureas, blood pressure medication, biomarkers, health care utilization, individualized treatment goals
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antihypertensive Agents, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Insulin, Life Expectancy, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Sulfonylurea Compounds, Time Factors, United States, Veterans, Comorbidity, Risk Assessment, Diabetes Complications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review