Cited by 71Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlNeonatal Health and Biochemistry

Strict preanalytical oral glucose tolerance test blood sample handling is essential for diagnosing gestational diabetes mellitus

Open access
Potter, Julia M., Hickman, Peter E., Oakman, Carmen, Woods, Catherine, Nolan, Christopher J.·2020·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Preanalytical processing of blood samples can affect plasma glucose measurement because ongoing glycolysis by cells prior to centrifugation can lower its concentration. In June 2017, ACT Pathology changed the processing of oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) blood samples for pregnant women from a delayed to an early centrifugation protocol. The effect of this change on the rate of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) diagnosis was determined. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: All pregnant women in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) are recommended for GDM testing with a 75-g OGTT using the World Health Organization diagnostic criteria. From January 2015 to May 2017, OGTT samples were collected into sodium fluoride (NaF) tubes and kept at room temperature until completion of the test (delayed centrifugation). From June 2017 to October 2018, OGTT samples in NaF tubes were centrifuged within 10 min (early centrifugation). RESULTS: A total of 7,509 women were tested with the delayed centrifugation protocol and 4,808 with the early centrifugation protocol. The mean glucose concentrations for the fasting, 1-h, and 2-h OGTT samples were, respectively, 0.24 mmol/L (5.4%), 0.34 mmol/L (4.9%), and 0.16 mmol/L (2.3%) higher using the early centrifugation protocol (P < 0.0001 for all), increasing the GDM diagnosis rate from 11.6% (n = 869/7,509) to 20.6% (n = 1,007/4,887). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study highlight the critical importance of the preanalytical processing protocol of OGTT blood samples used for diagnosing GDM. Delay in centrifuging of blood collected into NaF tubes will result in substantially lower rates of diagnosis than if blood is centrifuged early.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc20-0304

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The recommended approach to screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus relies on a single OGTT, which has limited reproducibility.

    “The recommended approach to screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus relies on a single OGTT, which has limited reproducibility. 49”

    From Australasian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society ( <scp>ADIPS</scp> ) 2025 consensus recommendations for the screening, diagnosis and classification of gestational diabetes (2025) · cites this paper as [49]

    The Introduction describes a recommended one-step OGTT for gestational diabetes diagnosis. The Conclusions show that diagnosis rates changed substantially with blood-sample handling, but the paper does not assess whether a single OGTT gives reproducible results when repeated in the same person. Sensitivity to sample handling supports a narrower point than the claimed limited reproducibility. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Pre-analytical factors (choice of blood collection tube, delayed transport, delayed separation of plasma from cells) can lead to marked underdiagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus due to in vitro glycolysis before sample processing.

    “Pre‐analytical factors (choice of blood collection tube, delayed transport, delayed separation of plasma from cells) can lead to marked underdiagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus due to in vitro glycolysis before sample processing. 49 , 50”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. [1]Schaefer-Graf U, Napoli A, Nolan CJ; Diabetic Pregnancy Study Group Diabetes in pregnancy: a new decade of challenges ahead. Diabetologia 2018; 61: 1012– 1021 29356835 PMC6448995
  2. [4]Bonetti G, Cancelli V, Coccoli G, Which sample tube should be used for routine glucose determination? Prim Care Diabetes 2016; 10: 227– 232 26657574
  3. [5]Norman M, Jones I The shift from fluoride/oxalate to acid citrate/fluoride blood collection tubes for glucose testing - the impact upon patient results. Clin Biochem 2014; 47: 683– 685 24463230
  4. [7]Lippi G, Nybo M, Cadamuro J, Guimaraes JT, van Dongen-Lases E, Simundic AM Blood glucose determination: effect of tube additives. Adv Clin Chem 2018; 84: 101– 123 29478513
  5. [8]van Balveren JA, Huijskens MJ, Gemen EF, Péquériaux NC, Kusters R Effects of time and temperature on 48 routine chemistry, haematology and coagulation analytes in whole blood samples. Ann Clin Biochem 2017; 54: 448– 462 27497436
  6. [9]Bruns DE, Metzger BE, Sacks DB Diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus will be flawed until we can measure glucose. Clin Chem 2020; 66: 265– 267 32040567 PMC7055661
  7. [10]Sacks DB, Arnold M, Bakris GL,.; National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Position statement executive summary: guidelines and recommendations for laboratory analysis in the diagnosis and management of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2011; 34: 1419– 1423 21617111 PMC3114347
  8. [11]Mansell E, Lunt H, Docherty P Laboratory diagnosis of gestational diabetes: an in silico investigation into the effects of pre-analytical processing on the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the oral glucose tolerance test. Clin Biochem 2017; 50: 506– 512 28161191
  9. [12]Daly N, Flynn I, Carroll C, Farren M, McKeating A, Turner MJ Impact of implementing preanalytical laboratory standards on the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus: a prospective observational study. Clin Chem 2016; 62: 387– 391 26637478
  10. [13]Jamieson EL, Spry EP, Kirke AB, Atkinson DN, Marley JV Real-world gestational diabetes screening: problems with the oral glucose tolerance test in rural and remote Australia. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019; 16: E4488 31739513 PMC6888052
  11. [16]Nesbitt GS, Smye M, Sheridan B, Lappin TR, Trimble ER; HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group Integration of local and central laboratory functions in a worldwide multicentre study: experience from the Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) Study. Clin Trials 2006; 3: 397– 407 17060214
  12. [17]Carey R, Lunt H, Heenan HF, Frampton CM, Florkowski CM Collection tubes containing citrate stabiliser over-estimate plasma glucose, when compared to other samples undergoing immediate plasma separation. Clin Biochem 2016; 49: 1406– 1411 27234599
  13. [18]van den Berg SA, Thelen MH, Salden LP, van Thiel SW, Boonen KJ It takes acid, rather than ice, to freeze glucose. Sci Rep 2015; 5: 8875 25748167 PMC4352852

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Potter, J. M., Hickman, P. E., Oakman, C., Woods, C., & Nolan, C. J.
Affiliations
  • Australian National University (AU)
  • Canberra Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
Nolan, Christopher J.
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2020-04-29
Volume
43
Issue
7
Pages
1438-1441
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W3020925325
Cited by
71
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10
FWCI
6.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Northwestern University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Neonatal Health and Biochemistry
Keywords
gestational diabetes mellitus, oral glucose tolerance test, pre-analytical variables, blood sample handling, glycolysis, pregnant women
MeSH terms
Pre-Analytical Phase, Adult, Australia, Blood Glucose, Blood Specimen Collection, Centrifugation, Endocrinology, False Positive Reactions, Fasting, Female, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Pregnancy, Specimen Handling, Time Factors, Reproducibility of Results, Diabetes, Gestational, Clinical Laboratory Techniques, Guideline Adherence, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review