Strict preanalytical oral glucose tolerance test blood sample handling is essential for diagnosing gestational diabetes mellitus
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: Preanalytical processing of blood samples can affect plasma glucose measurement because ongoing glycolysis by cells prior to centrifugation can lower its concentration. In June 2017, ACT Pathology changed the processing of oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) blood samples for pregnant women from a delayed to an early centrifugation protocol. The effect of this change on the rate of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) diagnosis was determined. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: All pregnant women in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) are recommended for GDM testing with a 75-g OGTT using the World Health Organization diagnostic criteria. From January 2015 to May 2017, OGTT samples were collected into sodium fluoride (NaF) tubes and kept at room temperature until completion of the test (delayed centrifugation). From June 2017 to October 2018, OGTT samples in NaF tubes were centrifuged within 10 min (early centrifugation). RESULTS: A total of 7,509 women were tested with the delayed centrifugation protocol and 4,808 with the early centrifugation protocol. The mean glucose concentrations for the fasting, 1-h, and 2-h OGTT samples were, respectively, 0.24 mmol/L (5.4%), 0.34 mmol/L (4.9%), and 0.16 mmol/L (2.3%) higher using the early centrifugation protocol (P < 0.0001 for all), increasing the GDM diagnosis rate from 11.6% (n = 869/7,509) to 20.6% (n = 1,007/4,887). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study highlight the critical importance of the preanalytical processing protocol of OGTT blood samples used for diagnosing GDM. Delay in centrifuging of blood collected into NaF tubes will result in substantially lower rates of diagnosis than if blood is centrifuged early.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The recommended approach to screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus relies on a single OGTT, which has limited reproducibility.
“The recommended approach to screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus relies on a single OGTT, which has limited reproducibility. 49”
From Australasian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society ( <scp>ADIPS</scp> ) 2025 consensus recommendations for the screening, diagnosis and classification of gestational diabetes (2025) · cites this paper as [49]
The Introduction describes a recommended one-step OGTT for gestational diabetes diagnosis. The Conclusions show that diagnosis rates changed substantially with blood-sample handling, but the paper does not assess whether a single OGTT gives reproducible results when repeated in the same person. Sensitivity to sample handling supports a narrower point than the claimed limited reproducibility. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredPre-analytical factors (choice of blood collection tube, delayed transport, delayed separation of plasma from cells) can lead to marked underdiagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus due to in vitro glycolysis before sample processing.
“Pre‐analytical factors (choice of blood collection tube, delayed transport, delayed separation of plasma from cells) can lead to marked underdiagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus due to in vitro glycolysis before sample processing. 49 , 50”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes
(2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0707943 · Cited by 5,563 · see citing works
Metzger, B. E., Gabbe, S. G., Persson, B., Lowe, L. P., Dyer, A. R., Oats, J. J. N., & Buchanan, T. A. (2010) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc10-0719 · Cited by 1,888 · see citing works
Acidification of blood is superior to sodium fluoride alone as an inhibitor of glycolysis
Gambino, R., Piscitelli, J., Ackattupathil, T. A., Theriault, J. L., Andrin, R. D., Sanfilippo, M. L., & Etienne, M. (2009) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1373/clinchem.2008.121707 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- [1]Schaefer-Graf U, Napoli A, Nolan CJ; Diabetic Pregnancy Study Group Diabetes in pregnancy: a new decade of challenges ahead. Diabetologia 2018; 61: 1012– 1021 29356835 PMC6448995
- [4]Bonetti G, Cancelli V, Coccoli G, Which sample tube should be used for routine glucose determination? Prim Care Diabetes 2016; 10: 227– 232 26657574
- [5]Norman M, Jones I The shift from fluoride/oxalate to acid citrate/fluoride blood collection tubes for glucose testing - the impact upon patient results. Clin Biochem 2014; 47: 683– 685 24463230
- [7]Lippi G, Nybo M, Cadamuro J, Guimaraes JT, van Dongen-Lases E, Simundic AM Blood glucose determination: effect of tube additives. Adv Clin Chem 2018; 84: 101– 123 29478513
- [8]van Balveren JA, Huijskens MJ, Gemen EF, Péquériaux NC, Kusters R Effects of time and temperature on 48 routine chemistry, haematology and coagulation analytes in whole blood samples. Ann Clin Biochem 2017; 54: 448– 462 27497436
- [9]Bruns DE, Metzger BE, Sacks DB Diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus will be flawed until we can measure glucose. Clin Chem 2020; 66: 265– 267 32040567 PMC7055661
- [10]Sacks DB, Arnold M, Bakris GL,.; National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Position statement executive summary: guidelines and recommendations for laboratory analysis in the diagnosis and management of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2011; 34: 1419– 1423 21617111 PMC3114347
- [11]Mansell E, Lunt H, Docherty P Laboratory diagnosis of gestational diabetes: an in silico investigation into the effects of pre-analytical processing on the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the oral glucose tolerance test. Clin Biochem 2017; 50: 506– 512 28161191
- [12]Daly N, Flynn I, Carroll C, Farren M, McKeating A, Turner MJ Impact of implementing preanalytical laboratory standards on the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus: a prospective observational study. Clin Chem 2016; 62: 387– 391 26637478
- [13]Jamieson EL, Spry EP, Kirke AB, Atkinson DN, Marley JV Real-world gestational diabetes screening: problems with the oral glucose tolerance test in rural and remote Australia. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019; 16: E4488 31739513 PMC6888052
- [16]Nesbitt GS, Smye M, Sheridan B, Lappin TR, Trimble ER; HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group Integration of local and central laboratory functions in a worldwide multicentre study: experience from the Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) Study. Clin Trials 2006; 3: 397– 407 17060214
- [17]Carey R, Lunt H, Heenan HF, Frampton CM, Florkowski CM Collection tubes containing citrate stabiliser over-estimate plasma glucose, when compared to other samples undergoing immediate plasma separation. Clin Biochem 2016; 49: 1406– 1411 27234599
- [18]van den Berg SA, Thelen MH, Salden LP, van Thiel SW, Boonen KJ It takes acid, rather than ice, to freeze glucose. Sci Rep 2015; 5: 8875 25748167 PMC4352852
Cited by
Sorted by citations
McIntyre, H. D., Gibbons, K. S., Ma, R. C. W., Tam, W. H., Sacks, D. A., Lowe, J., Madsen, L. R., & Catalano, P. M. (2020) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108353 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Sweeting, A., Hare, M. J., de Jersey, S. J., Shub, A. L., Zinga, J., Foged, C., Hall, R. M., Wong, T., & Simmons, D. (2025) · Medical Journal of Australia · doi:10.5694/mja2.52696 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Diagnosis of gestational diabetes: Evidence and pitfalls
Wong, T., Immanuel, J., Wong, V. W., Barnes, R., & Simmons, D. (2025) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.beem.2025.102069 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Potter, J. M., Hickman, P. E., Oakman, C., Woods, C., & Nolan, C. J.
- Affiliations
- Australian National University (AU)
- Canberra Hospital (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Nolan, Christopher J.
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 2020-04-29
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1438-1441
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- PMC
- PMC7305001
- OpenAlex
- W3020925325
- Cited by
- 71
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10
- FWCI
- 6.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Northwestern University
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Neonatal Health and Biochemistry
- Keywords
- gestational diabetes mellitus, oral glucose tolerance test, pre-analytical variables, blood sample handling, glycolysis, pregnant women
- MeSH terms
- Pre-Analytical Phase, Adult, Australia, Blood Glucose, Blood Specimen Collection, Centrifugation, Endocrinology, False Positive Reactions, Fasting, Female, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Pregnancy, Specimen Handling, Time Factors, Reproducibility of Results, Diabetes, Gestational, Clinical Laboratory Techniques, Guideline Adherence, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review