Closed-loop insulin delivery versus sensor-augmented pump therapy in older adults with type 1 diabetes (ORACL): a randomized, crossover trial
Published version of a preprint
Abstract
Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of closed-loop insulin delivery compared with sensor-augmented pump therapy among older adults with type 1 diabetes. Research design and methods This open-label, randomized (1:1), crossover trial compared 4 months of closed-loop versus sensor-augmented pump therapy. Eligible adults were aged ≥60 years, with type 1 diabetes (duration ≥10 years), using an insulin pump. The primary outcome was continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) time in range (TIR; 3.9-10.0 mmol/L). Results There were 30 participants (mean age 67 [SD 5] years), with median type 1 diabetes duration of 38 years (interquartile range [IQR] 20-47), randomized (n = 15 to each sequence); all completed the trial. The mean TIR was 75.2% (SD 6.3) during the closed-loop stage and 69.0% (9.1) during the sensor-augmented pump stage (difference of 6.2 percentage points [95% CI 4.4 to 8.0]; P Conclusions Closed-loop therapy is an effective treatment option for older adults with long-duration type 1 diabetes, and no safety issues were identified. These older adults had higher TIR accompanied by less time below range during closed loop than during sensor-augmented pump therapy. Of particular clinical importance, closed loop reduced the time spent in hypoglycemic range overnight.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The ORACL trial found small but significant decreases in hypoglycemia with the automated insulin delivery strategy.
“Moreover, they found small but significant decreases in hypoglycemia with the AID strategy.”
From 13. Older Adults: <i>Standards of Care in Diabetes—2024</i> (2024) · cites this paper as [44]
The ORACL trial in 30 older adults (mean age 67 years) with type 1 diabetes found that an automated insulin delivery strategy was associated with significant improvements in time in range compared with sensor-augmented pump therapy.
“The Older Adult Closed Loop (ORACL) trial in 30 older adults (mean age 67 years) with type 1 diabetes found that an automated insulin delivery (AID) strategy was associated with significant improvements in time in range compared with sensoraugmented pump therapy (44).”
From 13. Older Adults: <i>Standards of Care in Diabetes—2024</i> (2024) · cites this paper as [44]
The ORACL trial in 30 older adults (mean age 67 years) with type 1 diabetes found that an automated insulin delivery (AID) strategy was associated with significant improvements in time in range compared with sensor-augmented pump therapy.
“The Older Adult Closed Loop (ORACL) trial in 30 older adults (mean age 67 years) with type 1 diabetes found that an automated insulin delivery (AID) strategy was associated with significant improvements in TIR compared with sensoraugmented pump therapy (47).”
From 13. Older Adults: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [47]
The ORACL trial found small but significant decreases in hypoglycemia with the AID strategy.
“Moreover, they found small but significant decreases in hypoglycemia with the AID strategy.”
From 13. Older Adults: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [47]
In the ORACL trial in 30 older adults (mean age 67 years) with type 1 diabetes, an automated insulin delivery (AID) strategy was associated with significant improvements in time in range (TIR), as well as modest improvements in hypoglycemia, compared with sensor-augmented pump therapy.
“The Older Adult Closed Loop (ORACL) trial in 30 older adults (mean age 67 years) with type 1 diabetes found that an automated insulin delivery (AID) strategy was associated with significant improvements in time in range (TIR), as well as modest improvements in hypoglycemia, compared with sensor-augmented pump therapy (52).”
From 13. Older Adults: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 (2026) · cites this paper as [52]
Cites
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment
Nasreddine, Z. S., Phillips, N. A., Bédirian, V., Charbonneau, S., Whitehead, V., Collin, I., Cummings, J. L., & Chertkow, H. (2005) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x · Cited by 25,553 · see citing works
Battelino, T., Danne, T., Bergenstal, R. M., Amiel, S. A., Beck, R., Biester, T., Bosi, E., Buckingham, B. A., Cefalu, W. T., Close, K. L., et al. (2019) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dci19-0028 · Cited by 4,032 · see citing works
Seaquist, E. R., Anderson, J., Childs, B., Cryer, P., Dagogo-Jack, S., Fish, L., Heller, S. R., Rodriguez, H., Rosenzweig, J., & Vigersky, R. (2013) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc12-2480 · Cited by 1,389 · see citing works
Six-Month Randomized, Multicenter Trial of Closed-Loop Control in Type 1 Diabetes
Brown, S. A., Kovatchev, B. P., Raghinaru, D., Lum, J. W., Buckingham, B. A., Kudva, Y. C., Laffel, L. M., Levy, C. J., Pinsker, J. E., Wadwa, R. P., et al. (2019) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1907863 · Cited by 1,030 · see citing works
Effectiveness of Sensor-Augmented Insulin-Pump Therapy in Type 1 Diabetes
Bergenstal, R. M., Tamborlane, W. V., Ahmann, A., Buse, J. B., Dailey, G., Davis, S. N., Joyce, C., Peoples, T., Perkins, B. A., Welsh, J. B., et al. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1002853 · Cited by 894 · see citing works
The fallacy of average: how using HbA1c alone to assess glycemic control can be misleading
Beck, R. W., Connor, C. G., Mullen, D. M., Wesley, D. M., & Bergenstal, R. M. (2017) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc17-0636 · Cited by 477 · see citing works
Pratley, R. E., Kanapka, L. G., Rickels, M. R., Ahmann, A., Aleppo, G., Beck, R., Bhargava, A., Bode, B. W., Carlson, A., Chaytor, N. S., et al. (2020) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2020.6928 · Cited by 375 · see citing works
Forlenza, G. P., Li, Z., Buckingham, B. A., Pinsker, J. E., Cengiz, E., Wadwa, R. P., Ekhlaspour, L., Church, M. M., Weinzimer, S. A., Jost, E., et al. (2018) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc18-0771 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
Risk factors associated with severe hypoglycemia in older adults with type 1 diabetes
Weinstock, R. S., DuBose, S. N., Bergenstal, R. M., Chaytor, N. S., Peterson, C., Olson, B. A., Munshi, M. N., Perrin, A. J. S., Miller, K. M., Beck, R. W., et al. (2016) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc15-1426 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Hypoglycemia in older adults with type 1 diabetes
DuBose, S. N., Weinstock, R. S., Beck, R. W., Peters, A. L., Aleppo, G., Bergenstal, R. M., Rodriguez, H., Largay, J. F., Massaro, E. M., Hirsch, I. B., et al. (2016) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2016.0268 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Continuous glucose monitoring and metrics for clinical trials: an international consensus statement
Battelino, T., Alexander, C. M., Amiel, S. A., Arreaza-Rubin, G., Beck, R. W., Bergenstal, R. M., Buckingham, B. A., Carroll, J., Ceriello, A., Chow, E., et al. (2023) · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(22)00319-9 · Cited by 831 · see citing works
Phillip, M., Nimri, R., Bergenstal, R. M., Barnard-Kelly, K., Danne, T., Hovorka, R., Kovatchev, B. P., Messer, L. H., Parkin, C. G., Ambler-Osborn, L., et al. (2023) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/endrev/bnac022 · Cited by 443 · see citing works
Self-citation13. Older Adults: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025
American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee, ElSayed, N. A., McCoy, R. G., Aleppo, G., Balapattabi, K., Beverly, E. A., Briggs Early, K., Bruemmer, D., Echouffo-Tcheugui, J. B., Ekhlaspour, L., et al. (2025) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc25-s013 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
13. Older Adults: <i>Standards of Care in Diabetes—2024</i>
American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee, ElSayed, N. A., Aleppo, G., Bannuru, R. R., Bruemmer, D., Collins, B. S., Ekhlaspour, L., Hilliard, M. E., Johnson, E. L., Khunti, K., et al. (2024) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc24-s013 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
13. Older Adults: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026
American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee for Diabetes*, Bajaj, M., McCoy, R. G., Balapattabi, K., Bannuru, R. R., Bellini, N. J., Bennett, A. K., Beverly, E. A., Briggs Early, K., ChallaSivaKanaka, S., et al. (2026) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc26-s013 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Miller, K. M., Kanapka, L. G., Rickels, M. R., Ahmann, A. J., Aleppo, G., Ang, L., Bhargava, A., Bode, B. W., Carlson, A., Chaytor, N. S., et al. (2022) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2021.0503 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Real-world evidence of automated insulin delivery system use
Considine, E. G., & Sherr, J. L. (2024) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2023.0442 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Kovatchev, B. P., Singh, H., Mueller, L., & Gonder-Frederick, L. A. (2022) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc22-1217 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Automated insulin delivery in older adults with type 1 diabetes
Kudva, Y. C., Henderson, R. J., Kanapka, L. G., Weinstock, R. S., Rickels, M. R., Pratley, R. E., Chaytor, N., Janess, K., Desjardins, D., Pattan, V., et al. (2025) · NEJM Evidence · doi:10.1056/evidoa2400200 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Amigó, J., Ortiz-Zúñiga, Á., de Urbina, A. M. O., Sánchez, M., Dos-Santos, M., Abad, M., Cuadra, F., Simó, R., Hernández, C., & Simó-Servat, O. (2023) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2023.110730 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
- Authors
- McAuley, S. A., Trawley, S., Vogrin, S., Ward, G. M., Fourlanos, S., Grills, C. A., Lee, M. H., Alipoor, A. M., O’Neal, D. N., O’Regan, N. A., Sundararajan, V., Colman, P. G., & MacIsaac, R. J.
- Affiliations
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU)
- Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- University Hospital Waterford (IE)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 2021-11-29
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 381-390
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3215660496
- Cited by
- 117
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 17
- FWCI
- 12.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Keywords
- artificial pancreas, sensor-augmented pump therapy, type 1 diabetes, older adults, continuous glucose monitoring, time in range, glycemic control, hypoglycemia, diabetic ketoacidosis, insulin pump, HbA1c, comparative efficacy and safety, crossover design
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Insulin Infusion Systems, Middle Aged, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Cross-Over Studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review