Cited by 20Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeDiabetes Management and EducationDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Cost-effectiveness of the national diabetes prevention program: a real-world, 2-Year prospective study

Open access
Kuo, Shihchen, Ye, Wen, Wang, Di, McEwen, Laura N., Villatoro Santos, Claudia, Herman, William H.·2025·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the real-world cost-effectiveness of the National Diabetes Prevention Program (NDPP) for people with prediabetes in a large workforce with employer-sponsored health insurance. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed difference-in-differences analyses using individual-level health insurance claims and survey data for 5,948 adults with prediabetes who enrolled (n = 575) or did not enroll (n = 5,373) in the NDPP to assess NDPP’s effects on health economic outcomes. We assessed direct medical costs for the year before the NDPP enrollment/index date and for 2 years thereafter; EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) utility scores at baseline, 1 year, and 2 years; and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) over 2 years. We used propensity score weighting to adjust for potential bias due to self-selection for enrollment, multiple imputation to handle missing data, and bootstrapping to produce CIs. We adopted a health care sector perspective and discounted costs and QALYs at 3% annually. Costs were expressed in 2020 U.S. dollars. RESULTS: Compared with nonenrollees, each NDPP enrollee had an average reduction of $4,552 (95% CI −13,231, 2,014) in 2-year total direct medical costs. Cost savings were primarily related to hospitalizations, outpatient visits, and emergency room visits. Compared with nonenrollees, each enrollee had no difference in EQ-5D-5L utility scores at 2 years or QALYs gained over 2 years. The uncertainty analyses found that enrollment in the NDPP had an 88% probability of saving money and 84% probability of being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000 per QALY gained over 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world population with prediabetes, enrollment in the NDPP was likely to provide cost savings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc24-1110

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Structured lifestyle interventions based on the Diabetes Prevention Program have demonstrated favorable economic profiles in real-world settings, with a high probability of cost-effectiveness and potential cost savings over time.

    “Structured lifestyle interventions based on models such as the Diabetes Prevention Program have demonstrated favorable economic profiles in real-world settings, with evidence suggesting a high probability of cost-effectiveness and potential cost savings over time.102”

    From Weight maintenance after discontinuation of GLP-1 therapies (2026) · cites this paper as [102]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [18]Little R, Rubin D. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data, Third Edition. Hoboken, NJ, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2019

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kuo, S., Ye, W., Wang, D., McEwen, L. N., Villatoro Santos, C., & Herman, W. H.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology, and Diabetes, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan 1 , Ann Arbor, MI
Corresponding author
Kuo, Shihchen
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2024-11-20
Volume
48
Issue
7
Pages
1180-1188
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W4404562426
Cited by
19
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 7
FWCI
6.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK092926, R01DK109995)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U18DP006712)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
National Diabetes Prevention Program, prediabetes, cost-effectiveness, diabetes prevention, employer-sponsored health insurance, direct medical costs, quality-adjusted life years, hospitalization, workplace health promotion
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prediabetic State, Prospective Studies, Quality-Adjusted Life Years

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review