Cited by 7Retinal Imaging and AnalysisRetinal Diseases and TreatmentsOphthalmology and Visual Health Research

Real-World Prospective Validation and Economic Evaluation of Deep Learning– Based Diabetic Retinopathy Detection From Fundus Photographs: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Ran, An Ran, Ding, Jennifer Li, Tang, Ziqi, Lam, Ching, Nguyen, Truong X., Zhou, Jiaying, Zhang, Shuyi, Fang, Danqi +10 more·2026·Diabetes Care

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background Deep learning (DL) has shown promise in delivering diagnostic and economic benefits for detecting diabetic retinopathy (DR) from fundus photographs (FPs). However, evidence synthesis of model validation in prospective, real-world settings remains limited. Purpose To assess the feasibility of implementing DL-DR systems using FPs across different countries by synthesizing prospective validation and economic evidence. Data sources Five databases were searched until 13 August 2025. Study selection Studies prospectively assessing diagnostic performance and/or studies conducting economic analyses of DL-DR systems using FPs were selected. Data extraction Characteristics of all studies, performance parameters of prospective validation studies, and economic outcomes of economic analysis studies were extracted. Data synthesis Forty-seven studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled performance was the highest in detecting vision-threatening DR (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] 0.974), followed by any DR (AUROC 0.965), then referable DR (RDR) (AUROC 0.959). Study region, clinical pathway, mydriasis, image quality control, sample size, grading criteria, reference standard, and model architecture significantly affected model performance in RDR detection. Fifteen studies were included in the economic commentary, showing that DL-based DR screening was cost-effective in high-income countries, whereas results in middle-income countries were m…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc25-1493

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AI DR screening has high discriminative performance, particularly for vision-threatening DR, but performance is affected by region, clinical pathway, mydriasis, image quality control, sample size, grading criteria, reference standard, and model architecture.

    “Ran and colleagues reviewed 47 prospective validation studies and found high discriminative performance, particularly for vision-threatening DR, while also showing that region, clinical pathway, mydriasis, image quality control, sample size, grading criteria, reference standard, and model architecture affected performance (15).”
  • The diagnostic evidence base for AI-enabled DR screening is now substantial.

    “The diagnostic evidence base for AI-enabled DR screening is now substantial.”
  • Deep learning-based DR screening appeared generally favorable in high-income countries, while results in middle-income countries were mixed and sensitive to compliance rates, baseline glycemic control, and initial implementation costs; evidence from low-income countries remains sparse.

    “Ran and colleagues found that deep learning-based DR screening appeared generally favorable in high-income countries, whereas results in middle-income countries were mixed and sensitive to compliance rates, baseline glycemic control, and initial implementation costs; evidence from low-income countries remains sparse (15).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ran, A. R., Ding, J. L., Tang, Z., Lam, C., Nguyen, T. X., Zhou, J., Zhang, S., Fang, D., Yang, D., Ng, V., Lin, D., Lin, H., Tham, C. C., Chan, C. K. M., Szeto, S. K. H., Wong, T. Y., Sivaprasad, S., & Cheung, C. Y.
Affiliations
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
  • Singapore National Eye Center (SG)
  • NIHR Moorfields Biomedical Research Centre (GB)
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2025-11-19
Volume
49
Issue
3
Pages
510-525
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W4416370954
Cited by
7
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 7
FWCI
1.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee (14101324)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal Imaging and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research
Keywords
diabetic retinopathy, deep learning, fundus images, vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy, referable diabetic retinopathy, diagnostic accuracy, cost-effectiveness, automated retinopathy detection, diabetic macular edema, pupil dilation, image quality control
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Diabetic Retinopathy, Fundus Oculi, Humans, Photography, Prospective Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review