Cited by 27Retinal Imaging and AnalysisHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeRetinal Diseases and Treatments

Cost-effectiveness analysis of artificial intelligence-based diabetic retinopathy screening in rural China based on the Markov model

Open access
Li, Huilin, Li, Guanyan, Li, Na, Liu, Changyan, Yuan, Ziyou, Gao, Qingyue, Hao, Shaofeng, Fan, Shengfu +1 more·2023·PLOS ONE

Abstract

This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of different diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening strategies in rural regions in China by using a Markov model to make health economic evaluations. In this study, we determined the structure of a Markov model according to the research objectives, which required parameters collected through field investigation and literature retrieval. After perfecting the model with parameters and assumptions, we developed a Markov decision analytic model according to the natural history of DR in TreeAge Pro 2011. For this model, we performed Markov cohort and cost-effectiveness analyses to simulate the probabilistic distributions of different developments in DR and the cumulative cost-effectiveness of artificial intelligence (AI)-based screening and ophthalmologist screening for DR in the rural population with diabetes mellitus (DM) in China. Additionally, a model-based health economic evaluation was performed by using quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. Last, one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the stability of the results. From the perspective of the health system, compared with no screening, AI-based screening cost more (the incremental cost was 37,257.76 RMB (approximately 5,211.31 US dollars)), but the effect was better (the incremental utility was 0.33). Compared with AI-based screening, the cost of ophthalmologist screening was higher (the incremental cost was 14,886.76 RMB (approximately 2,070.19 US dollars)), and the effect was worse (the incremental utility was -0.31). Compared with no screening, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of AI-based DR screening was 112,146.99 RMB (15,595.47 US dollars)/QALY, which was less than the threshold for the ICER (< 3 times the per capita gross domestic product (GDP), 217,341.00 RMB (30,224.03 US dollars)). Therefore, AI-based screening was cost-effective, which meant that the increased cost for each additional quality-adjusted life year was merited. Compared with no screening and ophthalmologist screening for DR, AI-based screening was the most cost-effective, which not only saved costs but also improved the quality of life of diabetes patients. Popularizing AI-based DR screening strategies in rural areas would be economically effective and feasible and can provide a scientific basis for the further formulation of early screening programs for diabetic retinopathy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0291390

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous health economic studies in China have only compared a specific AI-based screening strategy with conventional manual screening.

    “Previous health economic studies in China have only compared a specific AI-based screening strategy with conventional manual screening, to indicate the cost-effectiveness of using AI for screening DR14,15,37–39.”

    From Economic evaluation for medical artificial intelligence: accuracy vs. cost-effectiveness in a diabetic retinopathy screening case (2024) · cites this paper as [38]

    The Materials and methods section describes a specific AI screening system, EyeWisdom, and an ophthalmologist-led screening mode. But the Discussion also compares AI screening with no screening, so this paper does not support the claim that the comparison was only with conventional manual screening. It also cannot establish what all previous Chinese studies compared. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Most previous health economic studies in China leaned towards adopting AI models with a high specificity (over 97%).

    “Most of these studies leaned towards adopting AI models with a high specificity (over 97%).”

    From Economic evaluation for medical artificial intelligence: accuracy vs. cost-effectiveness in a diabetic retinopathy screening case (2024) · cites this paper as [38]

    The Introduction says Chinese economic evaluations of AI-based diabetic-retinopathy screening are limited, but does not describe the specificity adopted by most previous studies. The Discussion mentions 97% sensitivity and 87% specificity, not a survey of prior economic studies using specificity over 97%. Searched the paper for specificity figures and prior-study comparisons. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [13]Sun MP, liu Y, Zhu WW, Jian WY. The analysis of seeking behavior and medical expenses for diabetic outpatients of New Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme in eastern areas of China. Chinese Journal of Health Policy. 2017; 10(11): 52– 58.
  2. [16]LI M, Wang GY, Xia HH, Tang XY, Feng ZQ, Yao YY, et al. Clinical evaluation of artificial intelligence system based on fundus photograph in diabetic retinopathy screening. Chin J Exp Ophthalmol 2019; 37(08): 663– 668.
  3. [42]China guidelines for pharmacoeconomic evaluations research group. China Guidelines for Pharmacoeconomic Evaluations. China Journal of Pharmaceutical Economics. 2011; (3): 7– 48.
  4. [49]Zhang WJ, Wei M. The Evaluation of the Mortality and Life Expectancy of Chinese Population. Population Journal. 2016; 38(3): 18– 28.
  5. [50]Liu Y, Pan MZ. Research progress of quality of life in diabetic patients. Word Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine. 2011; 6(12): 1082– 1084.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, H., Li, G., Li, N., Liu, C., Yuan, Z., Gao, Q., Hao, S., Fan, S., & Yang, J.
Affiliations
Changzhi Medical College (CN)
Corresponding author
Hao, Shaofeng
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2023-11-16
Volume
18
Issue
11
Pages
e0291390
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4388728436
Cited by
27
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1
FWCI
4.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
General Project of Shanxi Provincial Key R & D Plan (social development field): Research on Screening Model of Diabetic Retinopathy Based on Artificial Intelligence Diagnosis System (201903D321031)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal Imaging and Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
Keywords
retinopathy, cost-effectiveness, rural China, diabetes mellitus, quality-adjusted life years, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, Markov model, health economic evaluation, screening programs, sensitivity analysis
MeSH terms
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis, Artificial Intelligence, China, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetic Retinopathy, Humans, Markov Chains, Mass Screening, Quality of Life, Rural Population, Quality-Adjusted Life Years

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review