CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 241Diabetes Management and EducationPatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareMedical Research and Practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 97 of the 99 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Use of Language in Diabetes Care and Education

Dickinson, Jane K., Guzman, Susan J., Maryniuk, Melinda D., O’Brian, Catherine A., Kadohiro, Jane K., Jackson, Richard A., D’Hondt, Nancy, Montgomery, Brenda, Close, Kelly L., Funnell, Martha M.·2017·Diabetes Care
DOI 10.2337/dci17-0041
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Language is powerful and can have a strong impact on perceptions as well as behavior. A task force, consisting of representatives from the American Association of Diabetes Educators (AADE) and the American Diabetes Association (ADA), convened to discuss language in diabetes care and education. This document represents the expert opinion of the task force. The literature supports the need for a language movement in diabetes care and education. There are effective ways of communicating about diabetes. This article provides recommendations for language used by health care professionals and others when discussing diabetes through spoken or written words-whether directed to people with diabetes, colleagues, or the general public, as well as research questions related to language and diabetes.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dci17-0041

Cites

97 of 97 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 99 references

2 of the 99 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Iverson, 2007, AMA Manual of Style, 416

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–241 of 241

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Dickinson, J. K., Guzman, S. J., Maryniuk, M. D., O’Brian, C. A., Kadohiro, J. K., Jackson, R. A., D’Hondt, N., Montgomery, B., Close, K. L., & Funnell, M. M.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Clinical/Educational Services, Behavioral Diabetes Institute, San Diego, CA
  • Joslin Diabetes Center (US)
  • American Association of Diabetes Educators (US)
  • Diabetes Education and Support Consulting Services, Reno, NV
  • Grassroots Diabetes, Boston, MA
  • St. John Hospital & Medical Center (US)
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Bothell, WA
  • Close Concerns (United States) (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Dickinson, Jane K.
ORCID
Venue
Diabetes Care
Publisher
American Diabetes Association
Published
2017-10-17
Volume
40
Issue
12
Pages
1790-1799
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
DOI
10.2337/dci17-0041
OpenAlex
W2766357945
Cited by
241
References
99
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 1
FWCI
13.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.diabetesjournals.org/content/license (vor, 35 d)
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Medical Terminology › Medical Research and Practices
Keywords
diabetes education, health communication, patient-provider communication, public health communication
MeSH terms
Diabetes Mellitus, Health Personnel, Humans, Language, Patient Education as Topic, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Practice Guidelines as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review