Cited by 7Diabetes Treatment and ManagementThyroid Disorders and TreatmentsThyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Response to Comment on Bezin et al. GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and the Risk of Thyroid Cancer. Diabetes Care 2023;46:384–390

Open access
Bezin, Julien, Mathieu, Clément, Faillie, Jean-Luc, Pariente, Antoine·2023·Diabetes Care

Abstract

International audience

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dci23-0016

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The potential for residual confounding and the role of surveillance bias are important considerations that have not been thoroughly assessed.

    “Similarly, the potential for residual confounding (e.g., limited evaluation of specific risk factors for thyroid cancer such as obesity, neck radiation, and family history of thyroid cancer) and the role of surveillance bias (e.g., clinicians might be more likely to do a thyroid exam or ultrasound on patients taking GLP-1 RA) are important considerations that have been not thoroughly assessed.25,”

    From Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Thyroid Cancer: A Narrative Review (2024) · cites this paper as [54]

    In the opening paragraphs (page not supplied), the authors acknowledge potential residual confounding, including imperfectly captured obesity, although they also report additional obesity-adjusted analyses and an E-value calculation. Our copy does not assess whether GLP-1 RA users receive more thyroid examinations or ultrasounds, and it does not discuss family history or neck radiation as confounders. Its discussion of notoriety bias concerns pharmacovigilance reporting, not the clinical surveillance bias described in the claim. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bezin, J., Mathieu, C., Faillie, J.-L., & Pariente, A.
Affiliations
  • Université de Bordeaux (FR)
  • Inserm (FR)
Corresponding author
Bezin, Julien
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2023-04-26
Volume
46
Issue
5
Pages
e121-e122
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W4367060169
Cited by
7
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Oskar-Bordeaux (Universite de Bordeaux) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament et des Produits de Santé (2019S015)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
GLP-1 receptor agonists, thyroid cancer, cancer risk, drug safety
MeSH terms
Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor, Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists, Diabetes Mellitus, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Thyroid Neoplasms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review