Cited by 321Diabetes Treatment and ManagementThyroid Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentMetabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer

GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and the Risk of Thyroid Cancer

Bezin, Julien, Gouverneur, Amandine, Pénichon, Marine, Mathieu, Clément, Garrel, Renaud, Hillaire-Buys, Dominique, Pariente, Antoine, Faillie, Jean-Luc·2023·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether use of glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (RA) is associated with increased risk of thyroid cancer. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A nested case-control analysis was performed with use of the French national health care insurance system (SNDS) database. Individuals with type 2 diabetes treated with second-line antidiabetes drugs between 2006 and 2018 were included in the cohort. All thyroid cancers were identified through hospital discharge diagnoses and medical procedures between 2014 and 2018. Exposure to GLP-1 RA was measured within the 6 years preceding a 6-month lag-time period and considered as current use and cumulative duration of use based on defined daily dose (≤1, 1 to 3, >3 years). Case subjects were matched with up to 20 control subjects on age, sex, and length of diabetes with the risk-set sampling procedure. Risk of thyroid cancer related to use of GLP-1 RA was estimated with a conditional logistic regression with adjustment for goiter, hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, other antidiabetes drugs, and social deprivation index. RESULTS: A total of 2,562 case subjects with thyroid cancers were included in the study and matched with 45,184 control subjects. Use of GLP-1 RA for 1-3 years was associated with increased risk of all thyroid cancer (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.58, 95% CI 1.27-1.95) and medullary thyroid cancer (adjusted HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.04-3.05). CONCLUSIONS: In the current study we found increased risk of all thyroid cancer and medullary thyroid cancer with use of GLP-1 RA, in particular after 1-3 years of treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc22-1148

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Concerns regarding the validity of outcomes have emerged, particularly owing to reliance on indirect indicators such as calcitonin test, carcinoembryonic antigen measurement, or vandetanib treatment to distinguish between MTC and non-MTC, introducing potential misclassification.

    “Concerns regarding the validity of outcomes have emerged, particularly owing to the reliance on indirect indicators such as the calcitonin test, carcinoembryonic antigen measurement, or vandetanib treatment to distinguish between MTC and non-MTC. This approach introduces the potential for misclassification.21,25”
  • In a French nested case-control study, GLP-1 RA use for 1-3 years was associated with increased risk for any thyroid cancer (adjusted HR = 1.58, 95% CI 1.27-1.95).

    “GLP-1 RA use for 1–3 years was associated with increased risk for any thyroid cancer (adjusted HR = 1.58 [CI 1.27–1.95]) and MTC (adjusted HR = 1.78 [CI 1.04–3.05]).25”
  • Five observational studies included analyses considering different lag times for outcome assessment, while two studies provided distinct information differentiating between thyroid cancer in general and MTC.

    “In addition, five studies included analyses considering different lag times for outcome assessment, while two studies provided distinct information differentiating between thyroid cancer in general and MTC.25,38,51–53”
  • In a French nested case-control study, GLP-1 RA use for 1-3 years was associated with increased risk for MTC (adjusted HR = 1.78, 95% CI 1.04-3.05).

    “GLP-1 RA use for 1–3 years was associated with increased risk for any thyroid cancer (adjusted HR = 1.58 [CI 1.27–1.95]) and MTC (adjusted HR = 1.78 [CI 1.04–3.05]).25”
  • There was a large variation in the percentage of cases reported as MTC between the two studies that included this distinction.

    “Of note, there was a large variation in the percentage of cases reported as MTC between the two studies that included this distinction.25,38”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bezin, J., Gouverneur, A., Pénichon, M., Mathieu, C., Garrel, R., Hillaire-Buys, D., Pariente, A., & Faillie, J.-L.
Affiliations
  • Université de Bordeaux (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier (FR)
  • 4Département de Pharmacologie Médicale et Toxicologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
  • Inserm (FR)
Corresponding author
Faillie, Jean-Luc
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2022-11-10
Volume
46
Issue
2
Pages
384-390
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W4308701204
Cited by
320
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 64 · 2025: 118 · 2024: 94 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 2
FWCI
47.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Oskar-Bordeaux (Universite de Bordeaux) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament et des Produits de Santé (2019S015)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
Keywords
GLP-1 receptor agonists, thyroid cancer, medullary thyroid carcinoma, type 2 diabetes, drug safety, cancer risk, treatment duration
MeSH terms
Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Thyroid Neoplasms, Glucagon-Like Peptide 1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review