The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Decreased Sensitivity of the Pancreatic Beta Cells to Glucose in Prediabetic and Diabetic Subjects: A Glucose Dose-Response Study
Abstract
The dose-response curve for glucose-induced insulin release obtained by infusing glucose at four to five different rates to normal subjects was sine-shaped, the insulin secretion starting at a blood glucose concentration of about 100 to 125 mg. per 100 ml. The steepest rise in plasma insulin occurred between blood glucose levels of 200 and 350 mg. per 100 ml. When blood sugar was increased further, the plasma insulin curve started to level off. There were no differences in the dose-response characteristics of the early and late insulin responses to glucose infusion. In prediabetic subjects variations in blood glucose concentration between the fasting level and about 300 mg. per 100 ml. were accompanied by only a minor insulin response. Further eleva-ation of blood glucose to 450 to 650 mg. per 100 ml. induced a normal initial insulin response in two out of the eight prediabetics, while the late response was normalized in almost all of them. Thus, the insulin-glucose dose-response curves in the prediabetics seemed to be similar to those of the normals but shifted toward higher blood glucose concentrations. In subjects with mild maturity-onset diabetes or glucose intolerance only, there seemed to exist a further shift to the right of the dose-response curves. These findings suggest that (1) the mechanisms governing the early and late insulin responses to glucose are of identical nature, and (2) the decreased insulin response to glucose in prediabetics and mild diabetics is a relative one, very high glucose concentrations being capable of eliciting normal responses. These findings are compatible with our hypothesis that the defective insulin release in prediabetes and diabetes is due to a decrease in the sensitivity of the glucose receptor of the pancreatic β cell which transmits the glucose signal for insulin release.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Weyer, C., Bogardus, C., Mott, D. M., & Pratley, R. E. (1999) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci7231 · Cited by 1,940
Pacini, G., & Bergman, R. N. (1986) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/0169-2607(86)90106-9 · Cited by 695
Gerich, J. E., Langlois, M., Noacco, C., Karam, J. H., & Forsham, P. H. (1973) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.182.4108.171 · Cited by 688
From pre-diabetes to diabetes: diagnosis, treatments and translational research
Khan, R., Chua, Z., Tan, J., Yang, Y., Liao, Z., & Zhao, Y. (2019) · Medicina · doi:10.3390/medicina55090546 · Cited by 484
Diminished B cell secretory capacity in patients with noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus
Ward, W. K., Bolgiano, D. C., McKnight, B., Halter, J. B., & Porte, D. (1984) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci111542 · Cited by 483
Metadata
- Authors
- Cerasi, E., Luft, R., & Efendic, S.
- Venue
- Diabetes
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 1972-04-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 224-234
- ISSN
- 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-327X
- OpenAlex
- W2155175015
- Cited by
- 250
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 31.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Decreased Sensitivity of the Pancreatic Beta Cells to Glucose in Prediabetic and Diabetic Subjects: A Glucose Dose-Response Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/diab.21.4.224
- The paper
- Cerasi, E., Luft, R., & Efendic, S. (1972). Decreased Sensitivity of the Pancreatic Beta Cells to Glucose in Prediabetic and Diabetic Subjects: A Glucose Dose-Response Study. Diabetes. https://doi.org/10.2337/diab.21.4.224
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.