Cited by 118Pancreatic function and diabetesDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Treatment and Management

Studies on the Mechanism of Epinephrine-induced Hyperglycemia in Man: Evidence for Participation of Pancreatic Glucagon Secretion

Gerich, John E, Lorenzi, Mara, Tsalikian, Eva, Karam, John H·1976·Diabetes

Abstract

In man, epinephrine induces increases in plasma levels of glucagon, a lipolytic and hyperglycemic hormone. To determine glucagon's contribution to this hyperglycemia and lipolysis, the effects of inhibition of pancreatic alpha-cell responses to epinephrine were investigated with somatostatin and adrenergic receptor blockade. To avoid ambiguities that might result from concomitant changes in endogenous insulin secretion, these studies were performed in juvenile-type, insulin-deficient diabetic subjects. Compared with normal subjects, the diabetics had excessive glucagon responses to epinephrine, which had been infused to attain circulating levels within the range found in man in severe stress. Both somatostatin and propranolol completely prevented glucagon responses and diminished the glycemic response to epinephrine by 40 to 50 per cent. Free fatty acid responses to epinephrine were completely prevented by propranolol but unaffected with somatostatin. Phentolamine had no effect on glucose, free fatty acid, or glucagon responses to epinephrine. These studies demonstrate that epinephrine, via a betaadrenergic receptor mechanism, causes excessive plasma glucagon elevation in human diabetes mellitus and indicate that this hyperglucagonemia participates in the hyperglycemic, but not the lipolytic, response to epinephrine. Catecholamine-induced hyperglucagonemia may thus provide an additional explanation for the deterioration in carbohydrate tolerance associated with stress.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diab.25.1.65

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gerich, J. E., Lorenzi, M., Tsalikian, E., & Karam, J. H.
Affiliations
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Venue
Diabetes
Published
1976-01-01
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
65-71
ISSN
  • 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-327X
OpenAlex
W2142730388
Cited by
118
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
14.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Greenwall Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
epinephrine, hyperglycemia, glucagon secretion, alpha cells, beta-adrenergic receptors, somatostatin, propranolol, phentolamine, free fatty acids, lipolysis, insulin-deficient diabetes, stress hyperglycemia, carbohydrate tolerance
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Drug Synergism, Epinephrine, Fatty Acids, Nonesterified, Female, Glucagon, Humans, Hyperglycemia, Islets of Langerhans, Male, Middle Aged, Phentolamine, Propranolol, Somatostatin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review