The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Differences at the Receptor and Postreceptor Levels Between Human Omental and Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue in the Action of Insulin on Lipolysis
Abstract
The possible existence of regional differences in the antilipolytic action of insulin in human adipose tissue was investigated in vitro. Insulin-induced inhibition of glycerol release and insulin binding, measured in terms of receptor number, receptor affinity, and dissociation rates, were determined in omental and subcutaneous adipose tissue segments and isolated fat cells of 16 nonobese subjects who were undergoing elective abdominal surgery but were otherwise healthy. The sensitivity of the antilipolytic effect of insulin was higher in subcutaneous than in omental adipose tissue; the half-maximal effect was obtained with 1 and 3 μU/ml of insulin, respectively (P < 0.01). Responsiveness of the antilipolytic effect of insulin was threefold higher in the subcutaneous than in the omental region (P < 0.005). Insulin receptor affinity was significantly higher in subcutaneous than in omental fat cells, but there was no difference in receptor number (about 300,000 sites/cell). 125I-insulin dissociated more rapidly from omental than from subcutaneous adipocytes in both the absence and the presence of excess native insulin. The data suggest that significant regional differences exist in the antilipolytic action of insulin in man; omental fat being less responsive than subcutaneous fat. The difference involves the insulin receptor affinity, which is caused at least partly by variations in the insulin dissociation rate but is also due to differences in insulin action at the postreceptor level.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue: their relation to the metabolic syndrome
Wajchenberg, B. L. (2000) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/edrv.21.6.0415 · Cited by 2,961
Pathophysiology of human visceral obesity: an update
Tchernof, A., & Després, J.-P. (2013) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00033.2011 · Cited by 2,583
McKeigue, P. M., Shah, B., & Marmot, M. G. (1991) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(91)91164-p · Cited by 1,618
Influence of body fat distribution on free fatty acid metabolism in obesity.
Jensen, M. D., Haymond, M. W., Rizza, R. A., Cryer, P. E., & Miles, J. M. (1989) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci113997 · Cited by 683
Enzi, G., Gasparo, M., Biondetti, P., Fiore, D., Semisa, M., & Zurlo, F. (1986) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/44.6.739 · Cited by 547
Metadata
- Authors
- Bolinder, J., Kager, L., Östman, J., & Arner, P.
- Venue
- Diabetes
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 1983-02-01
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 117-123
- ISSN
- 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-327X
- OpenAlex
- W1968426538
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differences at the Receptor and Postreceptor Levels Between Human Omental and Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue in the Action of Insulin on Lipolysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/diab.32.2.117
- The paper
- Bolinder, J., Kager, L., Östman, J., & Arner, P. (1983). Differences at the Receptor and Postreceptor Levels Between Human Omental and Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue in the Action of Insulin on Lipolysis. Diabetes. https://doi.org/10.2337/diab.32.2.117
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.