The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Two-Year Experience with Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion in Relation to Retinopathy and Neuropathy
Abstract
Thirty patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) who had advanced background retinopathy were randomized to unchanged conventional treatment (UCT) or to continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). They were followed prospectively for 2 yr. The mean blood glucose and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) were significantly lower in the CSII group than in the UCT group. The mean blood glucose and HbA1c did not change from the first to the second year in either of the treatment groups in spite of less frequent home-monitoring of blood glucose and less frequent outpatient visits during the second year. Four patients in the CSII group and five in the UCT group developed proliterative retinopathy. However, a marginally significant trend was found toward more frequent improvement of retinal morphology in the CSII group (47%) than in the UCT group (13%). Beat-to-beat variation was found to deteriorate significantly with UCT compared with a nonsignificant improvement with CSII therapy. Vibration sense was unchanged in both treatment groups. It is concluded that near-normal blood glucose levels can be maintained with CSII therapy in spite of less frequent home-monitoring of blood glucose and outpatient visits. Furthermore, established background retinopathy may progress to proliferative retinopathy in spite of 2 yr of near-normal blood glucose levels. However, a marginally significant trend toward more frequent improvement of retinal morphology was found among CSII-treated patients compared with conventionally treated patients. Large-scale, prospective, randomized studies are needed to confirm these results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gæde, P., Vedel, P., Parving, H.-H., & Pedersen, O. (1999) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(98)07368-1 · Cited by 981
The Diabetes Control and Complications (DCCT) Research Group (1995) · Kidney International · doi:10.1038/ki.1995.236 · Cited by 694
Self-citationEarly Worsening of Diabetic Retinopathy in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial
(1998) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.116.7.874 · Cited by 509
Self-citationFeldt-Rasmussen, B., Mathiesen, E., & Deckert, T. (1986) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)91433-9 · Cited by 447
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lauritzen, T., Frost-Larsen, K., Larsen, H.-W., Deckert, T., & The Steno Study Group
- Venue
- Diabetes
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 1985-08-01
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- Supplement_3
- Pages
- 74-79
- ISSN
- 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-327X
- OpenAlex
- W2313488710
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Two-Year Experience with Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion in Relation to Retinopathy and Neuropathy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/diab.34.3.s74
- The paper
- Lauritzen, T., Frost-Larsen, K., Larsen, H.-W., Deckert, T., & The Steno Study Group. (1985). Two-Year Experience with Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion in Relation to Retinopathy and Neuropathy. Diabetes. https://doi.org/10.2337/diab.34.3.s74
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.