Cited by 509Retinal Diseases and TreatmentsDiabetes Management and ResearchRetinal Imaging and Analysis

Early Worsening of Diabetic Retinopathy in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial

The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group·1998·Archives of Ophthalmology

Abstract

Objectives To document the frequency, importance of, and risk factors for "early worsening" of diabetic retinopathy in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT). Methods The DCCT was a multicenter, randomized clinical trial comparing intensive vs conventional treatment in insulin-dependent diabetic patients who had no to moderate nonproliferative retinopathy. Retinopathy severity was assessed in 7-field stereoscopic fundus photographs taken at baseline and every 6 months. For this study, worsening was defined as progression of 3 steps or more on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study final scale, as the development of soft exudates and/or intraretinal microvascular abnormalities, as the development of clinically important retinopathy, or as any of the above, and was considered "early" if it occurred between baseline and 12-month follow-up visits. Results Early worsening was observed at the 6- and/or 12-month visit in 13.1% of 711 patients assigned to intensive treatment and in 7.6% of 728 patients assigned to conventional treatment (odds ratio, 2.06; P Conclusions In the DCCT, the long-term benefits of intensive insulin treatment greatly outweighed the risks of early worsening. Although no case of early worsening was associated with serious visual loss, our results are consistent with previous reports of sight-threatening worsening when intensive treatment is initiated in patients with long-standing poor glycemic control, particularly if retinopathy is at or…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archopht.116.7.874

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group
Corresponding author
The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group
Venue
Archives of Ophthalmology
Published
1998-07-01
Volume
116
Issue
7
Pages
874
ISSN
0003-9950 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4235291177
Cited by
509
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 18
FWCI
7.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal Imaging and Analysis
Keywords
diabetic retinopathy, retinopathy progression, tight glycemic control, HbA1c, type 1 diabetes, risk factors, proliferative diabetic retinopathy, diabetic macular edema, vision loss, Diabetes Control and Complications Trial, retinopathy severity
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetic Retinopathy, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Insulin, Male, Prognosis, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Visual Acuity, Cohort Studies, Incidence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review