Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 247

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Insulin Sensitivity Index in Nondiabetic Man: Correlation Between Clamp-derived and IVGTT-derived Values

Beard, James C, Bergman, Richard N, Ward, W Kenneth, Porte, Daniel·1986·Diabetes

Abstract

Although the minimal-model-based insulin sensitivity index (S1) can be estimated from the results of a simple 180-min intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT), its relationship to widely accepted but technically more difficult clamp-based techniques has not been resolved in humans. Therefore we measured S1 by standard IVGTT, modified IVGTT, and clamp methods in 10 nondiabetic men with %IBW of 109 ± 12 (mean ± SD). In the euglycemic clamp studies, insulin was infused to bring insulin levels (IRI) from basal, 8 ± 4 μU/ml, to plateaus of 21 ± 5 and 35 ± 6 μU/ml. S1[clamp], measured as the increase in glucose (G) clearance per increase in IRI [δINF/(δIRI × G)], averaged 0.29 ± 0.09 ml/kg·min per μU/ml. In the IVGTT studies, 300 mg/kg G was given as an i.v. bolus, and G and IRI were measured for 180 min; in the modified (mod) IVGTT, tolbutamide (300–500 mg) was given i.v. 20 min after the G to observe the effect of an IRI peak on G removal after G level was free of initial “mixing” effects. The S1 estimated by computer did not differ significantly between standard [(6.9 ± 3.4) × 1O−4 min−1 per μU/ml] and modified [(6.7 ± 3.5) × 10−4 min−1 per μU/ml] tests, indicating no bias due to the differing insulin patterns and levels. There was a strong positive correlation between S1 (mod IVGTT) and S1(clamp): r = 0.84; N = 10; P < 0.002. The correlation between S1(standard IVGTT) and S1(clamp) was 0.54, suggesting the modified test is less “noisy” Nonetheless, in eight euglycemic women with a wider range of adiposity, S1(standard IVGTT) has been significantly correlated with %IBW (r = −0.72) and basal IRI (r = −0.84). The correlation between S1 measures by clamp and IVGTT methods provides one step toward validation of the minimal model for studies of insulin action in man.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diab.35.3.362

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 247

Metadata

Authors
Beard, J. C., Bergman, R. N., Ward, W. K., & Porte, D.
Venue
Diabetes
Published
1986-03-01
Volume
35
Issue
3
Pages
362-369
ISSN
  • 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-327X
OpenAlex
W2130171861
Cited by
247
References
1
FWCI
3.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Insulin Sensitivity Index in Nondiabetic Man: Correlation Between Clamp-derived and IVGTT-derived Values. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/diab.35.3.362
The paper
Beard, J. C., Bergman, R. N., Ward, W. K., & Porte, D. (1986). The Insulin Sensitivity Index in Nondiabetic Man: Correlation Between Clamp-derived and IVGTT-derived Values. Diabetes. https://doi.org/10.2337/diab.35.3.362

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.