Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 192

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Competitive Insulin Autoantibody Assay: Prospective Evaluation of Subjects at High Risk for Development of Type I Diabetes Mellitus

Vardi, Pnina, Dib, Sergio A, Tuttleman, Marilyn, Connelly, Jeanne E, Grinbergs, Marta, Radizabeh, Albert, Riley, William J, Maclaren, Noel K, Eisenbarth, George S, Soeldner, J Stuart·1987·Diabetes

Abstract

A quantitative fluid-phase radioassay for autoantibodies reacting with insulin (competitive insulin autoantibody assay, CIAA) was developed. The assay's features include 1) use of a physiologic amount of 125I-labeled insulin, 2) parallel incubations with supraphysiologic cold insulin (competitive), and 3) an incubation time of 7 days and a single-step multiple-wash polyethylene glycol separation. Mean ± SE CIAA levels in 50 controls were 8 ± 1.4 nU/ml (range −16–33.3). In 36 cytoplasmic islet cell antibody (ICA)-positive nondiabetic first-degree relatives of type I (insulin-dependent) patients <30 yr of age, CIAA levels exceeded the normal range in 20 (55.6%) of 36 (mean 86.8 ± 17.1 nU/ml). In 26 ICA-positive relatives >30 yr of age, only 5 (19.2%) of 26 exceeded the normal range (mean 26.1 ± 9.4 nU/ml); P < .001 compared with younger ICA-positive relatives). Six ICA-negative HLA-identical siblings of type I diabetic patients had normal CIAA levels (mean 3.6 ± 5.8 nU/ml), and only 2 of 13 ICA-negative identical twins discordant for diabetes (mean 15.4 ± 6.6 nU/ml) exceeded the normal range. Nine (50%) of 18 ICApositive schoolchildren exceeded the normal range (mean 105.3 ± 36.7 nU/ml). Genetically susceptible subjects negative for CIAA (with only 3 exceptions) remained negative for CIAA on multiple determinations (3 conversions observed), and CIAA levels of positive subjects were relatively stable. Linear regression of the first CIAA level versus last (interval between sampling 1 mo to 10 yr) in genetically susceptible individuals showed a highly significant correlation (r = .95, P < .001). This simple radioimmunoassay appears to have requisite specificity and sensitivity to allow screening populations at risk to develop type I diabetes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diab.36.11.1286

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 192

Metadata

Authors
Vardi, P., Dib, S. A., Tuttleman, M., Connelly, J. E., Grinbergs, M., Radizabeh, A., Riley, W. J., Maclaren, N. K., Eisenbarth, G. S., & Soeldner, J. S.
Venue
Diabetes
Published
1987-11-01
Volume
36
Issue
11
Pages
1286-1291
ISSN
  • 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-327X
OpenAlex
W2112233991
Cited by
192
References
0
FWCI
5.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Competitive Insulin Autoantibody Assay: Prospective Evaluation of Subjects at High Risk for Development of Type I Diabetes Mellitus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/diab.36.11.1286
The paper
Vardi, P., Dib, S. A., Tuttleman, M., Connelly, J. E., Grinbergs, M., Radizabeh, A., Riley, W. J., Maclaren, N. K., Eisenbarth, G. S., & Soeldner, J. S. (1987). Competitive Insulin Autoantibody Assay: Prospective Evaluation of Subjects at High Risk for Development of Type I Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes. https://doi.org/10.2337/diab.36.11.1286

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.