CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 738Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementPregnancy and preeclampsia studiesAdipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

TNF-α Is a Predictor of Insulin Resistance in Human Pregnancy

Open access
Kirwan, John P., Hauguel-De Mouzon, Sylvie, Lepercq, Jacques, Challier, Jean-Claude, Huston-Presley, Larraine, Friedman, Jacob E., Kalhan, Satish C., Catalano, Patrick M.·2002·Diabetes
DOI 10.2337/diabetes.51.7.2207
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Historically, insulin resistance during pregnancy has been ascribed to increased production of placental hormones and cortisol. The purpose of this study was to test this hypothesis by correlating the longitudinal changes in insulin sensitivity during pregnancy with changes in placental hormones, cortisol, leptin, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α. Insulin resistance was assessed in 15 women (5 with gestational diabetes mellitus [GDM] and 10 with normal glucose tolerance) using the euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp procedure, before pregnancy (pregravid) and during early (12–14 weeks) and late (34–36 weeks) gestation. Body composition, plasma TNF-α, leptin, cortisol, and reproductive hormones (human chorionic gonadotropin, estradiol, progesterone, human placental lactogen, and prolactin) were measured in conjunction with the clamps. Placental TNF-α was measured in vitro using dually perfused human placental cotyledon from five additional subjects. Compared with pregravid, insulin resistance was evident during late pregnancy in all women (12.4 ± 1.2 vs. 8.1 ± 0.8 10−2 mg · kg−1 fat-free mass · min−1 · μU−1 · ml−1). TNF-α, leptin, cortisol, all reproductive hormones, and fat mass were increased in late pregnancy (P < 0.001). In vitro, most of the placental TNF-α (94%) was released into the maternal circulation; 6% was released to the fetal side. During late pregnancy, TNF-α was inversely correlated with insulin sensitivity (r = −0.69, P < 0.006). Furthermore, among all of the hormonal changes measured in this study, the change in TNF-α from pregravid to late pregnancy was the only significant predictor of the change in insulin sensitivity (r = −0.60, P < 0.02). The placental reproductive hormones and cortisol did not correlate with insulin sensitivity in late pregnancy. Multivariate stepwise regression analysis revealed that TNF-α was the most significant independent predictor of insulin sensitivity (r = −0.67, P < 0.0001), even after adjustment for fat mass by covariance (r = 0.46, P < 0.01). These observations challenge the view that the classical reproductive hormones are the primary mediators of change in insulin sensitivity during gestation and provide the basis for including TNF-α in a new paradigm to explain insulin resistance in pregnancy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diabetes.51.7.2207

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 46 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 601–700 of 738

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Kirwan, J. P., Hauguel-De Mouzon, S., Lepercq, J., Challier, J.-C., Huston-Presley, L., Friedman, J. E., Kalhan, S. C., & Catalano, P. M.
Affiliations
  • MetroHealth (US)
  • Département d’Endocrinologie, Institut Cochin de Génétique Moléculaire, Paris, France
  • Institut Cochin (FR)
  • Hôpital Cochin (FR)
  • University of Colorado Health (US)
ORCID
Venue
Diabetes
Publisher
American Diabetes Association
Published
2002-07-01
Volume
51
Issue
7
Pages
2207-2213
ISSN
  • 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-327X
DOI
10.2337/diabetes.51.7.2207
OpenAlex
W2130148279
Cited by
738
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 33
FWCI
19.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (11089, HD-22965, HD-11089)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD11089, HD-22965)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
Keywords
insulin resistance, pregnancy, TNF-α, gestational diabetes mellitus, insulin sensitivity, placental hormones, cortisol, leptin, human placental lactogen, human chorionic gonadotropin, hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp, fat mass, reproductive hormones, body composition, estradiol
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Glucose, Body Composition, Female, Gestational Age, Chorionic Gonadotropin, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Infusions, Intravenous, Insulin, Insulin Resistance, Placenta, Placental Lactogen, Predictive Value of Tests, Pregnancy, Prolactin, Reference Values, Regression Analysis, Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha, Glucose Clamp Technique, Diabetes, Gestational, Glucose Intolerance, Leptin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review