The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sulfonylureas in NIDDM
Abstract
Sulfonylureas have represented the backbone of oral therapy in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus for > 30 yr. Despite this, our knowledge about the mode of actions of these agents is limited, and the use of them is far from rational. Sulfonylureas lower blood glucose concentrations primarily by stimulating insulin secretion. The evidence for clinically significant extrapancreatic effects is scanty. Therefore, the effect of sulfonylurea is limited to patients with preserved β-cell function, with the best effect observed in the early stages of the disease. Sulfonylurea treatment is often started relatively late and is continued when the agents can no longer achieve the treatment goals. Drug dosages are increased to maximum recommended doses, although there is no evidence for a dose-response relationship between the sulfonylurea dose and its biological effect. To rationalize the use of sulfonylureas, we should ask the questions to whom, how much, and for how long? The decision to stop treatment is as important as the decision to start treatment.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In terms of efficacy, they appear to be similar to metformin, lowering A1C levels by ∼1.5 percentage points (26,49).”
From Medical Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes: A Consensus Algorithm for the Initiation and Adjustment of Therapy (2009) · cites this paper as [26]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–404 of 404
Patrick, A. W. (2001) · The Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh · doi:10.1177/1478271520013102004
Hypoglycemic Effect of Mushroom Extract (SXF) on Type 2 Diabetes Patients and Its Possible Mechanism
Konno, S., & Fullerton, S. (2025) · Open Journal of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases · doi:10.4236/ojemd.2025.159016
Kroon, L. A., & Zhou, C. (2025) · American Diabetes Association eBooks · doi:10.2337/9781580408462-ch08
Physiologic Modelling of Type-2-Diabetes for Medical Education
Biermann, E. (1996) · Vieweg+Teubner eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-322-85017-1_46
Metadata
- Authors
- Groop, L. C.
- Affiliations
- Helsinki University Hospital (FI)
- Corresponding author
- Groop, Leif C
- ORCID
- Groop, Leif C
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 1992-06-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 737-754
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- OpenAlex
- W1989058656
- Cited by
- 408
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 11.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Pancreatic function and diabetes
- Keywords
- sulfonylureas, type 2 diabetes, oral antidiabetic therapy, insulin secretion, beta-cell function, drug dosing, treatment duration, treatment discontinuation
- MeSH terms
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Islets of Langerhans, Sulfonylurea Compounds
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review