Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 281

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Effects of Treatment With the Antioxidant α-Lipoic Acid on Cardiac Autonomic Neuropathy in NIDDM Patients: A 4-month randomized controlled multicenter trial (DEKAN Study)

Ziegler, Dan, Schatz, Helmut, Conrad, Frank, Gries, F Arnold, Ulrich, Heinz, The DEKAN Study Group, Reichel, Gerhard·1997·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral treatment with the antioxidant alpha-lipoic acid (ALA) in NIDDM patients with cardiac autonomic neuropathy (CAN), assessed by heart rate variability (HRV). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled multicenter trial (Deutsche Kardiale Autonome Neuropathie [DEKAN] Study), NIDDM patients with reduced HRV were randomly assigned to treatment with daily oral dose of 800 mg ALA (n = 39) or placebo (n = 34) for 4 months. Parameters of HRV at rest included the coefficient of variation (CV), root mean square successive difference (RMSSD), and spectral power in the low-frequency (LF; 0.05–0.15 Hz) and high-frequency (HF; 0.15–0.5 Hz) bands. In addition, cardiovascular autonomic symptoms were assessed. RESULTS: Seventeen patients dropped out of the study (ALA n = 10; placebo n = 7). Mean blood pressure and HbA1 levels did not differ between the groups at baseline and during the study, but heart rate at baseline was higher in the group treated with ALA (P < 0.05). RMSSD increased from baseline to 4 months by 1.5 ms (−37.6 to 77.1) [median (minimum-maximum)] in the group given ALA and decreased by −0.1 ms (−19.2 to 32.8) in the placebo group (P < 0.05 for ALA vs. placebo). Power spectrum in the LF band increased by 0.06 bpm2 (−0.09 to 0.62) in ALA, whereas it declined by −0.01 bpm2 (−0.48 to 1.86) in placebo (P < 0.05 for ALA vs. placebo). Furthermore, there was a trend toward a favorable effect of ALA versus placebo for the CV and HF band power spectrum (P = 0.097 and P = 0.094 for ALA vs. placebo). The changes in cardiovascular autonomic symptoms did not differ significantly between the groups during the period studied. No differences between the groups were noted regarding the rates of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that treatment with ALA using a well-tolerated oral dose of 800 mg/day for 4 months may slightly improve CAN in NIDDM patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diacare.20.3.369

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 281

Metadata

Authors
Ziegler, D., Schatz, H., Conrad, F., Gries, F. A., Ulrich, H., The DEKAN Study Group, & Reichel, G.
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
1997-03-01
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
369-373
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2047106058
Cited by
281
References
0
FWCI
4.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Treatment With the Antioxidant α-Lipoic Acid on Cardiac Autonomic Neuropathy in NIDDM Patients: A 4-month randomized controlled multicenter trial (DEKAN Study). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/diacare.20.3.369
The paper
Ziegler, D., Schatz, H., Conrad, F., Gries, F. A., Ulrich, H., The DEKAN Study Group, & Reichel, G. (1997). Effects of Treatment With the Antioxidant α-Lipoic Acid on Cardiac Autonomic Neuropathy in NIDDM Patients: A 4-month randomized controlled multicenter trial (DEKAN Study). Diabetes Care. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.20.3.369

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.