The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Healing of diabetic neuropathic foot ulcers receiving standard treatment. A meta-analysis
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine the percentage of individuals with neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers receiving good wound care who heal within a defined period of time. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of the control groups of clinical trials that evaluated a treatment for diabetic neuropathic foot ulcers. The meta-analytic techniques used include an estimation of the weighted mean percentage healed by end point, an evaluation of the homogeneity of trials, and an estimate of the 95% CI of the grouped data. Grouped-data univariate and multivariate logistic regression was conducted to assess the impact of mean age, ulcer size, and duration on the percentage of ulcers healed at end point. RESULTS: We found a total of 10 control groups meeting our criteria. Six control groups used 20 weeks as the end point for healing or nonhealing. For the six control arms with a 20-week end point, we found a weighted mean healing rate of 30.9% (95% CI 26.6-35.1). A similar analysis for the four 12-week arms found a mean healing rate of 24.2% (19.5-28.8). We failed to detect any statistically significant heterogeneity for either the 20-week or the 12-week trials. CONCLUSIONS: After 20 weeks of good wound care, approximately 31% of diabetic neuropathic ulcers heal. Similarly, after 12 weeks of good care, approximately 24% of neuropathic ulcers attain complete healing. Further patient-level analyses are necessary to definitively determine the associations of age, wound size, and wound duration with likelihood of healing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In one meta-analysis, the pooled healing rate of SOC is 24% at 12 weeks [9], which is far from reaching satisfactory expectation.”
From Efficacy and safety of acellular dermal matrix in diabetic foot ulcer treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2017) · cites this paper as [9]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Activity Patterns of Patients With Diabetic Foot Ulceration
Armstrong, D. G., Lavery, L. A., Kimbriel, H. R., Nixon, B. P., & Boulton, A. J. M. (2003) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.26.9.2595 · Cited by 306
Chronic wound repair and healing in older adults: current status and future research
Gould, L., Abadir, P., Brem, H., Carter, M., Conner‐Kerr, T., Davidson, J., DiPietro, L., Falanga, V., Fife, C., Gardner, S., et al. (2015) · Wound Repair and Regeneration · doi:10.1111/wrr.12245 · Cited by 291
Self-citationA clinical trial of Integra Template for diabetic foot ulcer treatment
Driver, V. R., Lavery, L. A., Reyzelman, A. M., Dutra, T. G., Dove, C. R., Kotsis, S. V., Kim, H. M., & Chung, K. C. (2015) · Wound Repair and Regeneration · doi:10.1111/wrr.12357 · Cited by 291
Negative pressure wound therapy for treating foot wounds in people with diabetes mellitus.
Liu, Z., Dumville, J. C., Hinchliffe, R. J., Cullum, N., Game, F., Stubbs, N., Sweeting, M., & Peinemann, F. (2018) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd010318.pub3 · Cited by 173
Guo, X., Mu, D., & Gao, F. (2017) · International Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.02.008 · Cited by 80
Extracellular Matrix as a Strategy for Treating Chronic Wounds
Hodde, J. P., & Johnson, C. E. (2007) · American Journal of Clinical Dermatology · doi:10.2165/00128071-200708020-00001 · Cited by 70
Embil, J. M., Albalawi, Z., Bowering, K., & Trepman, E. (2018) · Canadian Journal of Diabetes · doi:10.1016/j.jcjd.2017.10.020 · Cited by 43
Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Evaluation and Management
Maderal, A. D., Vivas, A. C., Zwick, T. G., & Kirsner, R. S. (2012) · Hospital Practice · doi:10.3810/hp.2012.08.994 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Margolis, D. J., Kantor, J., & Berlin, J. A.
- Affiliations
- Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia 19104, USA. dmargoli@cceb.med.upenn.edu
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 1999-05-01
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 692-695
- ISSN
- 0149-5992
- 1935-5548
- Cited by
- 356
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.