Cited by 122Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlHemoglobinopathies and Related DisordersDiabetes Management and Research

Evaluation of HbA1c determination methods in patients with hemoglobinopathies.

Open access
Schnedl, W J, Krause, R, Halwachs-Baumann, G, Trinker, M, Lipp, R W, Krejs, G J·2000·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate commercially available determination methods for HbA1c in patients with hemoglobin variants. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: HbA1c values were determined with various commercially available methods, including ion-exchange high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), boronate affinity assay, and immunoagglutination in patients with the hemoglobin mutations Hb Graz, Hb Sherwood Forest, Hb O Padova, Hb D, and Hb S. RESULTS: The effect of hemoglobinopathies on glycohemoglobin measurements was highly method dependent. The HPLC methods for HbA1c determination lacked the resolution necessary to differentiate hemoglobin variants. They demonstrated additional peaks in the chromatograms and HbA1c results either too low or too high compared with the nondiabetic reference range. With all immunoassays, Hb Graz demonstrated falsely low values. The other hemoglobinopathies in our study caused falsely low and/or high HbA1c results in immunoagglutination methods. The boronate affinity method showed values in an acceptable range for all hemoglobin variants. CONCLUSIONS: Because of the local occurrence of Hb variants and the ethnic origin of a given population, every individual laboratory must establish and validate its own assay method. In managing diabetic patients, knowledge of hemoglobinopathies influencing HbA1c determination methods is essential because hemoglobin variants could cause mismanagement of diabetes resulting from false HbA1c determinations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diacare.23.3.339

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several hemoglobin variants and chemically modified derivatives of hemoglobin interfere with some assay methods.

    “Several hemoglobin variants (e.g., hemoglobins S, C, D, and E) and chemically modified derivatives of hemoglobin interfere with some assay methods (independent of any effects due to shortened RBC survival) (348-350) (for a review, see reference 347).”

    From Guidelines and Recommendations for Laboratory Analysis in the Diagnosis and Management of Diabetes Mellitus (2023) · cites this paper as [348]

    The Conclusions (section labeled “Schnedl and Associates”; page not provided) state that hemoglobin variants interfere with HbA1c methods, and the paper reports method-dependent results for Hb S and Hb D. Our copy does not establish interference from chemically modified hemoglobin derivatives or the cited examples Hb C and Hb E. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Several hemoglobin variants and chemically modified hemoglobin derivatives interfere with some HbA1c assay methods independently of shortened erythrocyte survival.

    “Several Hb variants (e.g., Hbs S, C, D, and E) and chemically modified Hb derivatives interfere with some assay methods [independently of any effects due to shortened erythrocyte survival (234-236); for a review, see (233)].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schnedl, W. J., Krause, R., Halwachs-Baumann, G., Trinker, M., Lipp, R. W., & Krejs, G. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Graz (AT)
  • Department of Internal Medicine, Karl-Franzens University, Graz, Austria. wolfgang.schnedl@kfunigraz.ac.at
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2000-03-01
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
339-344
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2125878545
Cited by
122
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
HbA1c testing, hemoglobin variants, hemoglobinopathies, HbS, ion-exchange HPLC, assay validation, diabetes management
MeSH terms
Blood Chemical Analysis, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Glycated Hemoglobin, Hemoglobinopathies, Hemoglobins, Abnormal, Humans, Biomarkers, Fructosamine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review