The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Functional Status of Persons With Diabetes-Related Lower-Extremity Amputations
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE—It is reasonable to predict that diabetes-related lower-extremity amputations have a detrimental impact on quality of life. However, we are unaware of any study in the medical literature describing the functional level of diabetic patients with amputations. The objective of this study was to evaluate amputations among diabetic patients and to determine the functional level of these patients with the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—We enrolled 124 patients with diabetes. Case subjects (n = 35) were defined as patients who had undergone amputation of the lower-extremity, and control subjects (n = 89) were defined as patients who had not undergone amputation. Study participants received a standard history and physical examination. RESULTS—Both the physical dimension scores (33.5 ± 14.9 vs. 22.3 ± 14.7, P < 0.001) and the total SIP scores (27.6 ± 9.9 vs. 22.5 ± 10.3, P = 0.013) were significantly higher for amputees. However, the psychosocial dimension scores were not significantly different between case and control subjects (14.9 ± 8.9 vs. 15.2 ± 10.0, P > 0.05). Post hoc analysis showed that the group of patients who had undergone transtibial amputation had a significantly higher total impairment score than patients who had not undergone amputation (P = 0.039). This is in contrast to patients with toe or midfoot amputations, for whom total impairment scores were not significantly higher than those for the control subjects. Interestingly, bilateral amputees did not have significantly higher scores on either SIP dimension compared with unilateral amputees. CONCLUSIONS—These findings exemplify the detrimental physical and psychosocial health status of patients with diabetes-related lower-extremity amputation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Psychosocial adjustment to lower-limb amputation: A review
Horgan, O., & MacLachlan, M. (2004) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09638280410001708869 · Cited by 584
Senneville, É., Albalawi, Z., van Asten, S. A., Abbas, Z. G., Allison, G., Aragón‐Sánchez, J., Embil, J. M., Lavery, L. A., Alhasan, M., Oz, O., et al. (2024) · Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews · doi:10.1002/dmrr.3687 · Cited by 498
Self-citationThorud, J. C., Plemmons, B., Buckley, C. J., Shibuya, N., & Jupiter, D. C. (2016) · The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery · doi:10.1053/j.jfas.2016.01.012 · Cited by 331
A Prospective Randomized Evaluation of Negative-pressure Wound Dressings for Diabetic Foot Wounds
Eginton, M. T., Brown, K. R., Seabrook, G. R., Towne, J. B., & Cambria, R. A. (2003) · Annals of Vascular Surgery · doi:10.1007/s10016-003-0065-3 · Cited by 321
Critical Limb Ischemia: Current Trends and Future Directions
Teraa, M., Conte, M. S., Moll, F. L., & Verhaar, M. C. (2016) · Journal of the American Heart Association · doi:10.1161/jaha.115.002938 · Cited by 256
Metadata
- Authors
- Peters, E. J. G., Childs, M. R., Wunderlich, R. P., Harkless, L. B., Armstrong, D. G., & Lavery, L. A.
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 2001-10-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1799-1804
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- OpenAlex
- W2135065135
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Functional Status of Persons With Diabetes-Related Lower-Extremity Amputations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/diacare.24.10.1799
- The paper
- Peters, E. J. G., Childs, M. R., Wunderlich, R. P., Harkless, L. B., Armstrong, D. G., & Lavery, L. A. (2001). Functional Status of Persons With Diabetes-Related Lower-Extremity Amputations. Diabetes Care. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.24.10.1799
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.