The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Model-Based Method for Assessing Insulin Sensitivity From the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE—Available insulin sensitivity (IS) methods based on the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) are empirical. We used a glucose-insulin model to derive an OGTT-based IS (oral glucose insulin sensitivity [OGIS]) index, which predicts glucose clearance in a glucose clamp. We validated OGIS against clamp data. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—OGIS requires glucose and insulin concentrations from a 75-g OGTT at 0, 2, and 3 h (3-h OGTT) or at 0, 1.5, and 2 h (2-h OGTT). The formula includes six constants optimized to match the clamp results. For this purpose, 15 lean nondiabetic subjects (BMI < 25 kg/m2), 38 obese nondiabetic subjects (BMI > 25 kg/m2), and 38 subjects with type 2 diabetes randomly underwent an OGTT and a 120 mU · min−1 · m−2 insulin infusion euglycemic clamp. Glucose clearance (ClCLAMP), calculated as the ratio of glucose infusion to concentration during the last hour of the clamp, was compared with OGIS. OGIS was also tested on an independent group of 13 subjects with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). RESULTS—OGIS and ClCLAMP were correlated in the whole group (R = 0.77, P < 0.0001), in the subgroups (lean: R = 0.59; obese: R = 0.73; type 2 diabetes: R = 0.49; P < 0.02), and in the independent IGT group (R = 0.65, P < 0.02). Reproducibility of OGIS and ClCLAMP were similar (coefficients of variation: OGIS 7.1%, ClCLAMP 6.4%). OGIS was as effective as ClCLAMP in discriminating between groups (for OGIS, lean vs. obese: 440 ± 16 vs. 362 ± 11 ml · min−1 · m−2, P < 0.001; lean vs. type 2 diabetes: 440 ± 16 vs. 239 ± 7, P < 0.0001; obese vs. type 2 diabetes: 362 ± 11 vs. 239 ± 7, P < 0.0001; results were similar for ClCLAMP). The relationships between IS and BMI, fasting plasma insulin, and insulin secretion (calculated from the OGTT insulin concentration) were examined. OGIS yielded results similar to ClCLAMP and fully consistent with established physiological principles. The performance of the index for the 3-h and 2-h OGTT was similar. CONCLUSIONS—OGIS is an index of IS in good agreement with the clamp. Because of its simplicity (only three blood samples required), this method has potential use for clinical investigation including large-scale epidemiological studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Matthews, D. R., Hosker, J. P., Rudenski, A. S., Naylor, B. A., Treacher, D. F., & Turner, R. C. (1985) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/bf00280883 · Cited by 31,502
Practical Statistics for Medical Research
Altman, D. G. (1990) · doi:10.1201/9780429258589 · Cited by 10,668
Bonora, E., Targher, G., Alberiche, M., Bonadonna, R. C., Saggiani, F., Zenere, M. B., Monauni, T., & Muggeo, M. (2000) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.23.1.57 · Cited by 2,456
Toward Physiological Understanding of Glucose Tolerance: Minimal-Model Approach
Bergman, R. N. (1989) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/diab.38.12.1512 · Cited by 1,001
Experimental validation of measurements of glucose turnover in nonsteady state.
Radziuk, J., Norwich, K. H., & Vranic, M. (1978) · American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism · doi:10.1152/ajpendo.1978.234.1.e84 · Cited by 277
Effect of insulin on the distribution and disposition of glucose in man.
Ferrannini, E., Smith, J. D., Cobelli, C., Toffolo, G., Pilo, A., & DeFronzo, R. A. (1985) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci111969 · Cited by 254
Insulin Control of Glucose Metabolism in Man
Insel, P. A., Liljenquist, J. E., Tobin, J. D., Sherwin, R. S., Watkins, P., Andres, R., & Berman, M. (1975) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci108006 · Cited by 244
Cited by
Sex and Gender Differences in Risk, Pathophysiology and Complications of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Kautzky-Willer, A., Harreiter, J., & Pacini, G. (2016) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2015-1137 · Cited by 2,043
Self-citationMuniyappa, R., Lee, S., Chen, H., & Quon, M. J. (2008) · American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism · doi:10.1152/ajpendo.00645.2007 · Cited by 1,643
Insulin resistance: a metabolic pathway to chronic liver disease
Bugianesi, E., McCullough, A. J., & Marchesini, G. (2005) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.20920 · Cited by 900
Surrogate markers of insulin resistance: A review
Singh, B. (2010) · World Journal of Diabetes · doi:10.4239/wjd.v1.i2.36 · Cited by 622
Assessment of insulin sensitivity/resistance
Gutch, M., Kumar, S., Razi, S., Gupta, K., & Gupta, A. (2015) · Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism · doi:10.4103/2230-8210.146874 · Cited by 555
Metadata
- Authors
- Mari, A., Pacini, G., Murphy, E., Ludvik, B., & Nolan, J. J.
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 2001-03-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 539-548
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- OpenAlex
- W2127277443
- Cited by
- 806
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 9.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Model-Based Method for Assessing Insulin Sensitivity From the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/diacare.24.3.539
- The paper
- Mari, A., Pacini, G., Murphy, E., Ludvik, B., & Nolan, J. J. (2001). A Model-Based Method for Assessing Insulin Sensitivity From the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test. Diabetes Care. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.24.3.539
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.