Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 988

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Tests of Glycemia in Diabetes

Open access
American Diabetes Association·2003·Diabetes Care

Abstract

Monitoring of glycemic status, as performed by patients and health care providers, is considered a cornerstone of diabetes care.Results of monitoring are used to assess the efficacy of therapy and to guide adjustments in medical nutrition therapy (MNT), exercise, and medications to achieve the best possible blood glucose control.This position statement presents the recommendations of the American Diabetes Association on the tests used most widely in monitoring the glycemic status of people with diabetes and addresses both patient and physician/laboratorybased testing.It does not address tests for diabetes screening and diagnosis.The recommendations are based on the American Diabetes Association's technical review on the subject, which should be consulted for further information (1). BLOOD GLUCOSE TESTINGBY PATIENTS -Within only a few years, self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) by patients has revolutionized management of diabetes.Using SMBG, patients with diabetes can work to achieve and maintain specific glycemic goals.Given the results of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) and other studies, there is broad consensus on the health benefits of normal or nearnormal blood glucose levels and on the importance, especially in insulin-treated patients, of SMBG in treatment efforts designed to achieve such glycemic goals.The subject of SMBG has been addressed extensively by two American Diabetes Association Consensus Conferences, which provide a comprehensive review of the subject (2,3).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diacare.26.2007.s106

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Goldstein DE, Little RR, Lorenz RA, Malone JI, Nathan D, Peterson CM: Tests of glycemia in diabetes (Technical Review). Diabetes Care 18:896–909, 1995 · DOI · Paper page
  2. American Diabetes Association: Self-monitoring of blood glucose (Consensus Statement). Diabetes Care 17:81–86, 1994 · DOI · Paper page
  3. American Diabetes Association: Self-monitoring of blood glucose (Consensus Statement). Diabetes Care 10:93–99, 1987 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Rohlfing CL, Wiedmeyer HM, Little RR, England JD, Tennill A, Goldstein DE: Defining the relationship between plasma glucose and HbA1c: analysis of glucose profiles and HbA1c in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Diabetes Care 25:275–278, 2002 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 988

Metadata

Authors
American Diabetes Association
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2003-01-01
Volume
26
Issue
suppl_1
Pages
s106-s108
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2161893186
Cited by
988
References
11
FWCI
31.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tests of Glycemia in Diabetes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/diacare.26.2007.s106
The paper
American Diabetes Association. (2003). Tests of Glycemia in Diabetes. Diabetes Care. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.26.2007.s106

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.