Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 439

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Prevalence of and Factors Associated With Diabetic Retinopathy in the Australian Population

Tapp, Robyn J., Shaw, Jonathan E., Harper, C. Alex, de Courten, Maximilian P., Balkau, Beverley, McCarty, Daniel J., Taylor, Hugh R., Welborn, Timothy A., Zimmet, Paul Z., on behalf of the AusDiab Study Group·2003·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE—To determine the prevalence and factors associated with diabetic retinopathy in the Australian population and to estimate the time difference between disease onset and clinical diagnosis of type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—The Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle study (AusDiab) included 11,247 adults aged ≥25 years in 42 randomly selected areas of Australia. Retinopathy was assessed in participants identified as having diabetes (based on self-report and oral glucose tolerance test), impaired fasting glucose, and impaired glucose tolerance and in a random sample with normal glucose tolerance. Data were available for 2,177 participants. RESULTS—Overall, 15.3% of those with diabetes had retinopathy. The prevalence of retinopathy was 21.9% in those with known type 2 diabetes (KDM) and 6.2% in those newly diagnosed (NDM). The prevalence of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) was 2.1% in those with KDM. No cases of PDR were found in those with NDM. Untreated vision threatening retinopathy (presence of PDR or macular edema) was present in 1.2% (n = 4). Factors associated with retinopathy were duration of diabetes, HbA1c, and systolic blood pressure. Using linear extrapolation of the prevalence of retinopathy with diabetes duration, the onset of diabetes in this population was approximately the time of diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS—This is one of the first national studies of diabetic retinopathy in a developed country. The prevalence of retinopathy was similar to that in other population-based studies. Vision threatening retinopathy was relatively rare; however, four untreated cases were identified. Regular screening for diabetic retinopathy and more aggressive management of modifiable risk factors could reduce the numbers of people who develop vision-threatening retinopathy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diacare.26.6.1731

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 439

Metadata

Authors
Tapp, R. J., Shaw, J. E., Harper, C. A., de Courten, M. P., Balkau, B., McCarty, D. J., Taylor, H. R., Welborn, T. A., Zimmet, P. Z., & on behalf of the AusDiab Study Group
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2003-06-01
Volume
26
Issue
6
Pages
1731-1737
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W1996459699
Cited by
439
References
3
FWCI
8.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Prevalence of and Factors Associated With Diabetic Retinopathy in the Australian Population. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/diacare.26.6.1731
The paper
Tapp, R. J., Shaw, J. E., Harper, C. A., de Courten, M. P., Balkau, B., McCarty, D. J., Taylor, H. R., Welborn, T. A., Zimmet, P. Z., & on behalf of the AusDiab Study Group. (2003). The Prevalence of and Factors Associated With Diabetic Retinopathy in the Australian Population. Diabetes Care. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.26.6.1731

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.