The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Standing Balance in Healthy Subjects. Evaluation of a Quantitative Test Battery on a Force Platform
Open accessAbstract
A quantitative battery of tests for standing balance is needed in the assessment of functional impairments. The aims of the present study were to obtain stabilometric reference values for healthy females and males, 20-64 years of age, on a stable computerized force platform (AMTI) and to relate the balance data thus obtained to some traditional functional balance tests. Altogether, 152 subjects performed a series of tests. The test battery on the force platform comprised tests of standing with feet close together or on one leg while looking straight ahead or while blindfolded. Traditional functional balance tests were checked and various background data were collected through a questionnaire. Results of a separate test-retest reliability study of the test battery given on the force platform appeared promising, especially for the tests with eyes open. In the main study, results obtained on the force platform correlated significantly (p less than 0.001) with results of most of the functional tests. Women showed higher standing balance as compared with men. The results suggest the importance of relating the test-data not only to age but also to sex.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Voelcker-Rehage, C., Godde, B., & Staudinger, U. M. (2011) · Fronties in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00026 · Cited by 438
Relationship between Clinical and Forceplate Measures of Postural Stability
Riemann, B. L., Guskiewicz, K. M., & Shields, E. W. (1999) · Journal of Sport Rehabilitation · doi:10.1123/jsr.8.2.71 · Cited by 435
Geurts, A. C. H., Nienhuis, B., & Mulder, T. W. (1993) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/s0003-9993(23)00004-7 · Cited by 295
Physical and motor fitness are both related to cognition in old age
Voelcker‐Rehage, C., Godde, B., & Staudinger, U. M. (2010) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.07014.x · Cited by 282
Niemann, C., Godde, B., & Voelcker-Rehage, C. (2014) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2014.00170 · Cited by 190
Metadata
- Authors
- Ekdahl, C., B Jarnlo, G., & I Andersson, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
- Publisher
- Medical Journals Sweden AB
- Published
- 2020-05-20
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 187-195
- ISSN
- 1650-1977 (ISSN-L)
- 1651-2081
- OpenAlex
- W65886716
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Standing Balance in Healthy Subjects. Evaluation of a Quantitative Test Battery on a Force Platform. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2340/165019778921187195
- The paper
- Ekdahl, C., B Jarnlo, G., & I Andersson, S. (2020). Standing Balance in Healthy Subjects. Evaluation of a Quantitative Test Battery on a Force Platform. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. https://doi.org/10.2340/165019778921187195
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
