Increasing the Longevity of Restorations by Minimal Intervention: A Two-year Clinical Trial
Open accessAbstract
Clinical Relevance: Treating defective restorations with sealants, repair or refurbishing is an effective way to preserve and treat existing restorations.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Longitudinal cohort studies have demonstrated that the success rate of treatment for failed restorations does not necessarily surpass the clinical performance of other alternative treatments such as repairing, sealing, or monitoring.
“longitudinal cohort studies have demonstrated that the success rate of treatment for failed restorations not necessarily surpass the clinical performance of other alternative treatments such as repairing, sealing, or monitoring teeth at risk [25-32].”
From Translating research into everyday clinical practice: Lessons learned from a USA dental practice-based research network (2013) · cites this paper as [30]
The Conclusions (page unavailable) report that repairing or sealing defective restorations produced results similar to replacement after two years. But the Results say the untreated group deteriorated, so this paper does not support monitoring as a comparably effective alternative. It describes its own study as a clinical trial, not a longitudinal cohort study. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Reasons for replacement of restorations in permanent teeth in general dental practice
Mjör, I. A., Moorhead, J. E., & Dahl, J. E. (2000) · International Dental Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1875-595x.2000.tb00569.x · Cited by 454 · see citing works
Self-citation(2001) · PubMed · Cited by 451 · see citing works
Two-year clinical evaluation of repair versus replacement of composite restorations
Gordan, V. V., Shen, C., Riley, J., & Mjör, I. A. (2006) · Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry · doi:10.1111/j.1708-8240.2006.00007.x · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Self-citationVariables influencing the repair strength of dental composites
Söderholm, K. M., & Roberts, M. J. (1991) · European Journal Of Oral Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0722.1991.tb01881.x · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Repair Versus Replacement of Failed Restorations
Mjör, I. A. (2023) · Dental Abstracts · doi:10.1016/j.denabs.2023.01.040 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Self-citationClinical evaluation of replacement of Class V resin based composite restorations
Gordan, V. V. (2001) · Journal of Dentistry · doi:10.1016/s0300-5712(01)00030-6 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Self-citationStrength of posterior composite repairs using different composite/bonding agent combinations.
Puckett, A., Holder, R., & O'Hara, J. W. (1992) · PubMed · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Cariostatic and ultraconservative sealed restorations: nine-year results among children and adults.
Mertz-Fairhurst, E. J., Adair, S. M., Sams, D. R., et al. (1995) · PubMed · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Sealing of occlusal hidden caries lesions: an alternative for curative treatment?
Weerheijm, K. L., Jj, D. S., van Amerongen, W. E., et al. (1992) · PubMed · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Gordan, V. V., Riley, J. L., Blaser, P. K., & Mjör, I. A. (2006) · Operative Dentistry · doi:10.2341/05-112 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Self-citationRepair or replacement of amalgam restorations: decisions at a USA and a UK dental school.
Setcos, J. C., Khosravi, R., WILSON, N. H. F., Shen, C., Yang, M. C. K., & Mjör, I. A. (2004) · PubMed · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Self-citationIn vitro evaluation of margins of replaced resin based composite restorations
GORDAN, V. V. (2000) · Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry · doi:10.1111/j.1708-8240.2000.tb00223.x · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Self-citation(2006) · PubMed · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Marginal gap repair with flowable resin-based composites.
Gordan, V. V., Shen, C., & Mjör, I. A. (2004) · PubMed · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Self-citationRepair Strength of Dental Amalgams
Shen, C., Speigel, J., & Mjör, I. A. (2006) · Operative Dentistry · doi:10.2341/04-205 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Self-citationRepair of non-carious amalgam margin defects.
ROBERTS, H. W., Charlton, D. G., & Murchison, D. F. (2001) · PubMed · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Amalgam repair: evaluation of bond strength and microleakage.
Özer, F., Ünlü, N., Oztürk, B., et al. (2002) · PubMed · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gordan, V. V., Riley, J. L., Geraldeli, S., Rindal, D. B., Qvist, V., Fellows, J. L., Kellum, H. P., & Gilbert, G. H. (2012) · The Journal of the American Dental Association · doi:10.14219/jada.archive.2012.0238 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Self-citationSealing, Refurbishment and Repair of Class I and Class II Defective Restorations
Moncada, G., Martin, J., Fernández, E., Hempel, M. C., Mjör, I. A., & Gordan, V. V. (2009) · The Journal of the American Dental Association · doi:10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0191 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Self-citationAlternative treatments to replacement of defective amalgam restorations
Gordan, V. V., Riley, J. L., Blaser, P. K., Mondragon, E., Garvan, C. W., & Mjör, I. A. (2011) · The Journal of the American Dental Association · doi:10.14219/jada.archive.2011.0274 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Self-citationMinimal Invasive Treatment for Defective Restorations: Five-Year Results Using Sealants
Martin, J., Fernandez, E., Estay, J., Gordan, V., Mjor, I., & Moncada, G. (2013) · Operative Dentistry · doi:10.2341/12-062c · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Self-citationSharif, M. O., Fedorowicz, Z., Tickle, M., & Brunton, P. A. (2010) · British Dental Journal · doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.2010.722 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Gordan, V. V. (2013) · Dental Materials · doi:10.1016/j.dental.2012.07.159 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Moncada, G., Fernández, E., Martín, J., Arancibia, C., Mjör, I., & Gordan, V. V.
- Affiliations
- University of Florida (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gordan, V. V.
- Venue
- Operative Dentistry
- Publisher
- Operative Dentistry
- Published
- 2008-01-01
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 258-264
- ISSN
- 0361-7734 (ISSN-L)
- 1559-2863
- OpenAlex
- W2169383368
- Cited by
- 117
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 16.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Operative Dentistry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Universidad de Chile (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Dental materials and restorations
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
- Keywords
- defective restorations, restoration longevity, minimal intervention, amalgam restorations, composite resin restorations, marginal sealing, marginal adaptation, restoration repair, restoration replacement, secondary caries
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Dental Bonding, Color, Composite Resins, Dental Alloys, Dental Amalgam, Dental Caries, Dental Polishing, Dental Restoration, Permanent, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Middle Aged, Pit and Fissure Sealants, Surface Properties, Treatment Outcome, Dental Prosthesis Repair, Dental Marginal Adaptation, Retreatment, Resin Cements
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review