Cited by 117Dental materials and restorationsEndodontics and Root Canal TreatmentsDental Health and Care Utilization

Increasing the Longevity of Restorations by Minimal Intervention: A Two-year Clinical Trial

Open access
Moncada, G., Fernández, E., Martín, J., Arancibia, C., Mjör, I., Gordan, V. V.·2008·Operative Dentistry

Abstract

Clinical Relevance: Treating defective restorations with sealants, repair or refurbishing is an effective way to preserve and treat existing restorations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2341/07-113

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Longitudinal cohort studies have demonstrated that the success rate of treatment for failed restorations does not necessarily surpass the clinical performance of other alternative treatments such as repairing, sealing, or monitoring.

    “longitudinal cohort studies have demonstrated that the success rate of treatment for failed restorations not necessarily surpass the clinical performance of other alternative treatments such as repairing, sealing, or monitoring teeth at risk [25-32].”

    From Translating research into everyday clinical practice: Lessons learned from a USA dental practice-based research network (2013) · cites this paper as [30]

    The Conclusions (page unavailable) report that repairing or sealing defective restorations produced results similar to replacement after two years. But the Results say the untreated group deteriorated, so this paper does not support monitoring as a comparably effective alternative. It describes its own study as a clinical trial, not a longitudinal cohort study. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moncada, G., Fernández, E., Martín, J., Arancibia, C., Mjör, I., & Gordan, V. V.
Affiliations
University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Gordan, V. V.
Venue
Operative Dentistry
Published
2008-01-01
Volume
33
Issue
3
Pages
258-264
ISSN
  • 0361-7734 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-2863
OpenAlex
W2169383368
Cited by
117
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 11
FWCI
16.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Operative Dentistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Universidad de Chile (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Dental materials and restorations
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
Keywords
defective restorations, restoration longevity, minimal intervention, amalgam restorations, composite resin restorations, marginal sealing, marginal adaptation, restoration repair, restoration replacement, secondary caries
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Dental Bonding, Color, Composite Resins, Dental Alloys, Dental Amalgam, Dental Caries, Dental Polishing, Dental Restoration, Permanent, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Middle Aged, Pit and Fissure Sealants, Surface Properties, Treatment Outcome, Dental Prosthesis Repair, Dental Marginal Adaptation, Retreatment, Resin Cements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review