Cited by 23Muscle metabolism and nutritionSports Performance and TrainingBiochemical effects in animals

Supplemental creatine monohydrate loading improves cognitive function in experienced mountain bikers

Borchio, Lucas, Machek, Steven B., Machado, Marco·2020·The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.23736/s0022-4707.20.10589-9

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Borchio, L., Machek, S. B., & Machado, M.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Iguaçu (BR)
  • Baylor University (US)
Venue
The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness
Published
2020-09
Volume
60
Issue
8
Pages
1168-1170
ISSN
  • 0022-4707 (ISSN-L)
  • 1827-1928
OpenAlex
W3087453733
Cited by
23
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1
Type
supplementary materials
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biochemical effects in animals
Keywords
creatine monohydrate, creatine supplementation, cognitive function, mountain bikers, endurance athletes, cognitive performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review