Cited by 27Diabetes Treatment and ManagementPancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchPharmacology and Obesity Treatment

Pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Nreu, Besmir, Dicembrini, Ilaria, Tinti, Federico, Mannucci, Edoardo, Monami, Matteo·2020·Minerva Endocrinology

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: An association between glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RA) and risk of pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer has been suggested. Since its first description, several new trials (including three cardiovascular outcome trials) have been published, substantially increasing the available data set. This suggests the need for an update of the previous meta-analysis. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A Medline search for GLP-1 receptor agonists (exenatide, liraglutide, lixisenatide, albiglutide, dulaglutide, or semaglutide) was performed, collecting all randomized clinical trials, with duration ≥52 weeks, enrolling patients with type 2 diabetes, and comparing a GLP-1 receptor agonist with placebo or any other non-GLP-1 receptor agonist drug. The endpoints were pancreatitis, pancreatic cancer reported as serious adverse events. Mantel-Haenszel Odds Ratio (MH-OR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was calculated for all outcomes defined above, on an intention-to-treat basis. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: A total of 43 trials fulfilling inclusion criteria (all reporting data on pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer) was identified. GLP-1 RA showed no association with pancreatitis (MH-OR 1.24 [0.94, 1.64]; P=0.13) and pancreatic cancer (MH-OR 1.28 [0.87, 1.89]; P=0.20). CONCLUSIONS: No clear evidence of risk for pancreatitis was observed, whereas data on pancreatic cancer are too scarce to draw any conclusion.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.23736/s0391-1977.20.03219-8

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nreu, B., Dicembrini, I., Tinti, F., Mannucci, E., & Monami, M.
Affiliations
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi (IT)
Corresponding author
Monami, Matteo
Venue
Minerva Endocrinology
Published
2020-07
Volume
48
Issue
2
Pages
206-213
ISSN
  • 0391-1977 (ISSN-L)
  • 2724-6116
OpenAlex
W3046710325
Cited by
27
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3
FWCI
0.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Minerva Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
Keywords
GLP-1 receptor agonists, pancreatitis, pancreatic cancer, type 2 diabetes, exenatide, liraglutide, lixisenatide, albiglutide, dulaglutide, semaglutide, serious adverse events, drug safety
MeSH terms
Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor, Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Pancreatitis, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review