Cited by 33Anomaly Detection Techniques and ApplicationsMaritime Navigation and SafetyTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Maritime Anomaly Detection Based on Mean-Reverting Stochastic Processes Applied to a Real-World Scenario

Open access
d'Afflisio, Enrica, Braca, Paolo, Millefiori, Leonardo M., Willett, Peter·2018·2018 21st International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION)

Abstract

A novel anomaly detection procedure is presented, based on the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck (OU) mean-reverting stochastic process. The considered anomaly is a vessel that deviates from a planned route, changing its nominal velocity. In order to hide this behavior, the vessel switches off its Automatic Identification System (AIS) device for a certain time, and then tries to revert to the previous nominal velocity. The decision that has to be taken is either declaring that a deviation happened or not, relying only upon two consecutive AIS contacts. A proper statistical hypothesis testing procedure that builds on the changes in the OU process long-term velocity parameter of the vessel is the core of the proposed approach and enables for the solution of the anomaly detection problem.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.23919/icif.2018.8455854

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The anomaly detector in [31], [32] runs a generalized likelihood ratio test to make decisions on the existence of anomalous deviations within a given time window relying upon available measurements such as AIS, radar, or SAR.

    “Using the OU model to represent the vessel dynamics and contextual information to define the nominal behaviour at sea, the anomaly detector in [31], [32] runs a hypothesis testing procedure - the generalized likelihood ratio test - to make decisions on the existence of anomalous deviations within a given time window relying upon the available measurements (e.g. AIS, radar, SAR).”

    From Space-Based Global Maritime Surveillance. Part II: Artificial Intelligence and Data Fusion Techniques (2021) · cites this paper as [32]

    Section C describes a generalized likelihood ratio test for detecting deviations, and Section II formulates the decision over the interval during which AIS is disabled. But the Introduction says this paper's decision relies only on two consecutive AIS contacts; it assigns the extension to other sensor contacts to a different work. This source therefore does not support the radar and SAR examples. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • This method can integrate measurements from multiple sources and handle different levels of data unavailability.

    “This method, successfully applied to a real-world rendezvous detection scenario in [32], can integrate measurements from multiple sources and handle different levels of data unavailability.”

    From Space-Based Global Maritime Surveillance. Part II: Artificial Intelligence and Data Fusion Techniques (2021) · cites this paper as [32]

    The First and Second region sections (page numbers unavailable) show the detector working with simulated gaps in real-world AIS tracks, supporting its use when some data are unavailable. The paper does not show it integrating measurements from multiple sources or establish performance across different levels of data unavailability. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • An innovative statistical framework combines available context data with a parametric model of the vessel's kinematic behaviour.

    “More recently, an innovative statistical framework [31], [32] that combines the available context data with a parametric model of the vessel's kinematic behaviour has received special attention.”

    From Space-Based Global Maritime Surveillance. Part II: Artificial Intelligence and Data Fusion Techniques (2021) · cites this paper as [32]

    The Problem Formulation describes a statistical hypothesis test using a parametric Ornstein–Uhlenbeck model of vessel velocity, supporting the kinematic-model part of the claim. But the Introduction says the decision relies only on two AIS contacts, and the Problem Formulation specifies no other information during the gap; our copy does not establish that the framework combines the model with available context data. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • This line of research has focused on the development of anomaly detection strategies that provide the ability to reveal vessel deviations from standard navigational routes as well as dark deviations in the presence of possibly intentional surveillance gaps.

    “This line of research has focused on the development of anomaly detection strategies that provide the ability to reveal vessel deviations from standard navigational routes as well as dark deviations in the presence of possibly intentional surveillance gaps (due to AIS disablements or limited sensor coverage).”
  • This method has been successfully applied to a real-world rendezvous detection scenario.

    “This method, successfully applied to a real-world rendezvous detection scenario in [32], can integrate measurements from multiple sources and handle different levels of data unavailability.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. d'afflisio, 0, Detecting stealth deviations from standard routes using the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process
  2. alava, 2017, Massive Chinese fleet jeopardizes threatened shark species around the Galápagos marine reserve and waters off Ecuador: Implications for national and international fisheries policy, International Journal of Fisheries Research
  3. jakob, 2009, Adversarial modeling and reasoning in the maritime domain

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
d'Afflisio, E., Braca, P., Millefiori, L. M., & Willett, P.
Affiliations
  • NATO Centre for Maritime Research and Experimentation (IT)
  • University of Connecticut (US)
Venue
2018 21st International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2018-07
Pages
1171-1177
OpenAlex
W2889603650
Cited by
33
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.79
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION) (publishedVersion)
  • Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
University of the Aegean
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Maritime Navigation and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Target Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
Keywords
maritime anomaly detection, Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process, Automatic Identification System, hypothesis testing, maritime surveillance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review