Cited by 22Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchEpilepsy research and treatment

A Machine Learning Model to Predict Seizure Susceptibility from Resting-State fMRI Connectivity

Open access
Garner, Rachael, Rocca, Marianna La, Barisano, Giuseppe, Toga, Arthur W., Duncan, Dominique, Vespa, Paul·2019·2019 Spring Simulation Conference (SpringSim)

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of disability globally. Many patients develop post-traumatic epilepsy, or recurrent seizures following TBI. In recent years, significant efforts have been made to identify biomarkers of epileptogenesis that may assist in preventing seizure occurrence by identifying high-risk patients. We present a novel method of assessing seizure susceptibility using data from 49 patients enrolled in the Epilepsy Bioinformatics Study for Antiepileptogenic Therapy (EpiBioS4Rx). We employ a machine learning paradigm that utilizes a Random Forest classifier trained with resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data to predict seizure outcomes. Following 100 rounds of stratified cross-validation with 70% of resting state fMRI scans as the training set and 30% as the testing set, our model was found to assess seizure outcome in the testing set with 69% accuracy. To validate the method, we compared our results with classification by Support Vector Machines and Neural Network classifiers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.23919/springsim.2019.8732859

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Garner, R., Rocca, M. L., Barisano, G., Toga, A. W., Duncan, D., & Vespa, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
2019 Spring Simulation Conference (SpringSim)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-04
Volume
2019
Pages
1-11
OpenAlex
W2952091391
Cited by
22
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1
FWCI
5.61
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Spring Simulation Multiconference (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Bari Aldo Moro) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (U54NS100064)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
Keywords
seizure susceptibility, post-traumatic epilepsy, traumatic brain injury, epileptogenesis, resting-state functional connectivity, antiepileptogenic therapy, biomarkers, seizure outcome prediction, random forest

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review