The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A MODEL FOR DEVELOPING HIGH-QUALITY ONLINE COURSES: INTEGRATING A SYSTEMS APPROACH WITH LEARNING THEORY
Open accessAbstract
As the demand for online education continues to increase, institutions are faced with developing process models for efficient, high-quality online course development. This paper describes a systems, team-based, approach that centers on an online instructional design theory (Active Mastery Learning) implemented at Colorado State University-Global Campus.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“and learners acquiring higher class skills become more effective in today's competitive world (e.g., Puzziferro and Shelton [69]).”
From A Comparative Study of the ADDIE Instructional Design Model in Distance Education (2022) · cites this paper as Puzziferro and Shelton [69]
Citations
Cites
Human Characteristics and School Learning
Bennett, N., & Bloom, B. S. (1979) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3119887 · Cited by 1,732 · cited 3×
“Xu and Morris [14] studied team roles and curricular decisions of a course development team, consisting of a project coordinator, a web instructional designer, and four faculty members.”
BackgroundInfluentialIMPLEMENTING THE SEVEN PRINCIPLES: Technology as Lever
Ehrmann, S. C. (2004) · Cited by 1,023
How People Learn: Bridging Research and Practice
Donovan, M. S., Bransford, J. D., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2000) · Cited by 872
Lessons from the cyberspace classroom: the realities of online teaching
(2001) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.39-1083 · Cited by 634 · cited 1×
“There is general agreement of this principle in the literature [1, 2, 10]; however, in practice the technology can often be very alluring to creative and innovative instructional development teams--but technological bells and whistles will not replace good pedagogy.”
BackgroundGrowing by Degrees: Online Education in the United States, 2005.
Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2005) · Cited by 418
Collaborative Course Development for Online Courses
Xu, H., & Morris, L. V. (2007) · Innovative Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10755-006-9033-5 · Cited by 101
A University is not a Business (and Other Fantasies).
Greenberg, M. (2004) · Educational Review · Cited by 38
Hawkes, M. L., & Coldeway, D. O. (2002) · Cited by 37
Applying the ADDIE Model to Online Instruction
Shelton, K., & Saltsman, G. (2011) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-60960-503-2.ch305 · Cited by 33
Self-citationKazu, İ. Y., Kazu, H., & Özdemir, O. (2005) · Cited by 32
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 15 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Martin, F., Ritzhaupt, A. D., Kumar, S., & Budhrani, K. (2019) · Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.04.001 · Cited by 326
Xu, D., & Jaggars, S. S. (2013) · Economics of Education Review · doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2013.08.001 · Cited by 359
“…through a team-based approach, with faculty collaborating with an instructional designer and often with additional support staff (Alvarez, Blair, Monske, & Wolf, 2005; Hawkes & Coldeway, 2002; Hixon, 2008; Knowles & Kalata, 2007; Puzziferro & Shelton, 2008; Thille, 2008; Xu & Morris, 2007).”
BackgroundA Comparative Study of the ADDIE Instructional Design Model in Distance Education
Spatioti, A. G., Kazanidis, I., & Pange, J. (2022) · Information · doi:10.3390/info13090402 · Cited by 689
“…into a creative process, thus creating strong parallels with constructivist approaches that emphasize creation as a central role in the construction of knowledge, and learners acquiring higher class skills become more effective in today’s competitive world (e.g., Puzziferro and Shelton [69]).”
BackgroundThe future of mindfulness training is digital, and the future is now
Mrazek, A. J., Mrazek, M. D., Cherolini, C. M., Cloughesy, J. N., Cynman, D. J., Gougis, L. J., Landry, A. P., Reese, J. V., & Schooler, J. W. (2019) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.11.012 · Cited by 201
Chen, B., Kern, D. E., Kearns, R. M., Thomas, P. A., Hughes, M. T., & Tackett, S. A. (2019) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000002580 · Cited by 212
Big Data Emerging Technology: Insights into Innovative Environment for Online Learning Resources
Huda, M., Maseleno, A., Atmotiyoso, P., Siregar, M., Ahmad, R., Jasmi, K. A., & Muhamad, N. H. N. (2018) · International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) · doi:10.3991/ijet.v13i01.6990 · Cited by 184
“The data can come from online activities where the users usually upload, retrieve and also store the information shared through the Internet platform [1][2][3].”
BackgroundJournal of University Teaching & Learning Practice
Harvey, M., & Luzia, K. (2013) · Cited by 141
A National Study of Training Content and Activities for Faculty Development for Online Teaching
Meyer, K. A., & Murrell, V. S. (2014) · Online Learning · doi:10.24059/olj.v18i1.355 · Cited by 104
“Perhaps the most common training activity for faculty is the design and development of an online course, especially one that the faculty will teach in the near future [4, 6, 15, 16, 17, 18].”
BackgroundOnline Learning: Does It Help Low-Income and Underprepared Students?
Jaggars, S. S. (2011) · doi:10.7916/d8z03hdf · Cited by 75
Designing for Game-Based Learning: The Effective Integration of Technology to Support Learning
Alaswad, Z., & Nadolny, L. (2015) · Journal of Educational Technology Systems · doi:10.1177/0047239515588164 · Cited by 75
“In terms of assessment, technology enables instructors to provide relevant and meaningful feedback to students in a timely manner (Puzziferro & Shelton, 2008).”
BackgroundFaculty and instructional designers on building successful collaborative relationships
Richardson, J. C., Ashby, I., Alshammari, A., Cheng, Z., Johnson, B. S., Krause, T., Lee, D., Randolph, A., & Wang, H. (2018) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-018-9636-4 · Cited by 93
Online Learning: trends, issues and challenges in the Big Data Era
Anshari, M., Alas, Y., Yunus, N., Sabtu, N. I. B. P. H., & Hamid, M. H. S. (2015) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · doi:10.20368/1971-8829/1003 · Cited by 70
“Deploying online learning has helped education providers to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of their services (Puzziferro & Shelton, 2014; Su et al., 2014; Park & Lim, 2015).”
BackgroundLevac, D. E., Glegg, S., Camden, C., Rivard, L. M., & Missiuna, C. A. (2014) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.2522/ptj.20130500 · Cited by 68
Beyond the early adopters of online instruction: Motivating the reluctant majority
Hixon, E., Buckenmeyer, J. A., Barczyk, C., Feldman, L., & Zamojski, H. (2011) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.11.005 · Cited by 64
Differentiation of Roles: Instructional Designers and Faculty in the Creation of Online Courses
Halupa, C. (2019) · International Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.5430/ijhe.v8n1p55 · Cited by 61
“ Design skills Puzziferro and Shelton (2008) defined the following roles for an instructional designer in a two-member team (faculty course developer and instructional designer) where a second faculty member with expertise in the subject provides the review:”
BackgroundMeyer, K. A. (2013) · Online Learning · doi:10.24059/olj.v17i4.320 · Cited by 65
“Colorado State University used active mastery learning, using Bloom’s taxonomy and systems theory to create faculty development for online courses [44].”
MethodВласенко, К. В., Чумак, О., Lovianova, I., Kovalenko, D. A., & Volkova, N. P. (2020) · E3S Web of Conferences · doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202016610011 · Cited by 52
Feng, X., Neacşu, I., & Li, Y. (2021) · The Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00220671.2021.1930986 · Cited by 49
“Faculty members collaborate with instructional designers and often collaborate with other support staff (Alvarez et al., 2005; Hawkes & Coldeway, 2002; Hixon, 2008; Knowles & Kalata, 2007; Puzziferro & Shelton, 2008; Thille, 2008; Xu & Morris, 2007).”
BackgroundCostley, J., & Lange, C. H. (2016) · The Electronic Journal of e-Learning · Cited by 48
Scoppio, G., & Luyt, I. (2015) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-015-9452-y · Cited by 60
“Instructors desire more contact with colleagues and instructional designers during the development stages of their online courses, as well as time to develop a reciprocal relationship that provides opportunities for feedback and reflection (Lackey 2011; Puzziferro and Shelton 2008).”
BackgroundBest, M., & MacGregor, D. (2015) · International Journal of Technology and Design Education · doi:10.1007/s10798-015-9350-z · Cited by 45
“Ideally, online courses should be collaboratively designed and developed by academics with content and pedagogical expertise, complemented with the skills and knowledge of online educational designers or instructional technologists (Puzziferro and Shelton 2008).”
BackgroundActive Learning to Improve Student Learning Experiences in an Online Postgraduate Course
Lamon, S., Knowles, O., Hendy, A. M., Story, I. H., & Currey, J. (2020) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2020.598560 · Cited by 42
“• One to two videos from external providers and/or links to online interactive activities to ensure student active engagement (Puzziferro and Shelton, 2008; Laurillard, 2013; Sun and Chen, 2015; Stone, 2016).”
BackgroundDavey, B., Elliott, K. A., & Bora, M. (2019) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/1.16.1.3 · Cited by 40
“Students now have the world at their fingertips via the internet, and so do not rely upon expert oration presented at a particular time and place (Puzziferro & Shelton 2008).”
Xu, H., & Mahenthiran, S. (2016) · International Business Research · doi:10.5539/ibr.v9n2p1 · Cited by 39
“…design theory that emphasizes the importance of creating team based learning environment where learner-learner, learner-instructor, and learner-content interactions are monitored to provide students feedback about the progress they are making in online learning (Puzziferro & Shelton, 2008).”
BackgroundJaggars, S. S., & Xu, D. (2013) · doi:10.7916/d8057cx2 · Cited by 37
“…designed through a teambased approach, with faculty collaborating with an instructional designer and often with additional support staff (Alvarez, Blair, Monske, & Wolf, 2005; Hawkes & Coldeway, 2002; Hixon, 2008; Knowles & Kalata, 2007; Puzziferro & Shelton, 2008; Thille, 2008; Xu & Morris, 2007).”
Mentoring University Faculty to become High Quality Online Educators: A Program Evaluation.
Hixon, E., Barczyk, C., Buckenmeyer, J. A., & Feldman, L. (2011) · Online journal of distance learning administration · Cited by 34
Ragan, L. C., Bigatel, P. M., Kennan, S. S., & Dillon, J. M. (2012) · Cited by 31
Burrola-Mendez, Y., Goldberg, M., Gartz, R., & Pearlman, J. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0199251 · Cited by 24
Development of the online course for training master students majoring in mathematics
Власенко, К. В., Lovianova, I., Rovenska, O. G., Армаш, Т. С., & Achkan, V. V. (2021) · Journal of Physics Conference Series · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1946/1/012001 · Cited by 22
Mrazek, A. J., Mrazek, M. D., Reese, J. V., Kirk, A. C., Gougis, L. J., Delegard, A. M., Cynman, D. J., Cherolini, C. M., Carr, P. C., & Schooler, J. W. (2019) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci9030230 · Cited by 25
“Second, a digital approach allows for standardization of key elements of course content and presentation, thereby ensuring that all students receive the same high-quality instruction [17,18].”
BackgroundRivard, L., Camden, C., Pollock, N., & Missiuna, C. (2015) · Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics · doi:10.3109/01942638.2014.985414 · Cited by 23
“For references related to e-learning please see Puzziferro and Shelton (2008) and Merill (2003)).”
BackgroundStudents' Perceptions of Quality Across Four Course Development Models
Brown, V. S., Lewis, D., & Toussaint, M. (2018) · Online Learning · doi:10.24059/olj.v22i2.1213 · Cited by 20
“Adoption can be slow because faculty serve many roles, functioning as graphic artist, web designer, and instructional designer (Puzziferro & Shelton, 2008).”
BackgroundPuksa, M., & Janzen, K. R. (2020) · Journal of Nursing Education · doi:10.3928/01484834-20201118-05 · Cited by 19
Σπατιώτη, Α. Γ., Kazanidis, I., & Pange, J. (2023) · Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education · doi:10.17718/tojde.1177297 · Cited by 43
“There is the growing demand for e-courses but does not keep pace with proper pedagogical planning and the necessary skills required as a prerequisite for such learning environments (Khalil & Elkhider, 2016; Puzziferro & Shelton, 2008).”
BackgroundShi, J., & Fan, L. (2021) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440211040800 · Cited by 18
“The QM rubrics are a set of guides that are useful not only in creating, or evaluating online courses, but also in their strong adaptation when needed (Puzziferro & Shelton, 2008).”
BackgroundMost courses are not born digital
Varonis, E. M. (2014) · Campus-Wide Information Systems · doi:10.1108/cwis-09-2013-0053 · Cited by 18
Mindful Medical Education Online
Haras, C., Calhoun, A. S., Olson, A. P. J., & Rosenberg, M. E. (2021) · Medical Science Educator · doi:10.1007/s40670-021-01253-7 · Cited by 17
Student Perceptions of Quality and Satisfaction in Online Education
Simpson, J., & Benson, A. D. (2013) · Quarterly review of distance education · doi:10.1108/qrde-12-2013-0004 · Cited by 16
Instructor Impact on Differences in Teaching Presence Scores in Online Courses
Fiock, H. S., Maeda, Y., & Richardson, J. C. (2021) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v22i3.5456 · Cited by 20
“Commonly, there are two models for online course development in large online programs: (a) courses designed by instructors and (b) “standard” or “canned courses” (Puzziferro & Shelton, 2008, p. 130).”
Management of online platform development and support process
Власенко, К. В., Volkov, S. V., Lovianova, I., Чумак, О., Sitak, I. V., & Bobyliev, D. Y. (2021) · Workshop on Cloud Technologies in Education (CTE) · doi:10.55056/ceur-ws.org/vol-2879/paper18.pdf · Cited by 16
Learning through Design: MOOC Development as a Method for Exploring Teaching Methods
Bartoletti, R. (2016) · Cited by 16
Karaman, M. K., & Özen, S. O. (2016) · Educational Technology & Society · Cited by 14
A National Survey of Faculty Development Evaluation Outcome Measures and Procedures
Meyer, K. A., & Murrell, V. S. (2014) · Online Learning · doi:10.24059/olj.v18i3.450 · Cited by 18
“Colorado State University used active mastery learning, using Bloom’s taxonomy and systems theory to create faculty development for online courses (Puzziferro & Shelton, 2008).”
MethodTeaching Adult Learners in Online Career and Technical Education
Hernández-Gantes, V. M. (2009) · International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies · doi:10.4018/jwbltt.2009091503 · Cited by 13
Adaptive Online Learning Technology
Huda, M., Ulfatmi, Luthfi, M. J., Jasmi, K. A., Basiron, B. B., Mustari, M. I., Safar, A. J., Embong, W. H. W., Mohamad, A. M., & Mohamed, A. K. (2018) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-5519-3.ch008 · Cited by 11
A 'Just-in-Time' Pragmatic Approach to Creating Quality Matters-Informed Online Courses
Murillo, A. P., & Jones, K. M. L. (2020) · Information and Learning Sciences · doi:10.1108/ils-04-2020-0087 · Cited by 9
Mrazek, A. J., Mrazek, M. D., Brown, C. S., Karimi, S. S., Ji, R. R., Ortega, J. R., Maul, A., Carr, P. C., Delegard, A. M., Kirk, A. C., et al. (2022) · Technology Mind and Behavior · doi:10.1037/tmb0000092 · Cited by 8
Online course design structure and interface
Ralston‐Berg, P., & Braatz, H. (2021) · New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education · doi:10.1002/ace.20411 · Cited by 8
Comparison of student satisfaction, perceived learning and outcome performance:
Taliaferro, S. L., & Harger, B. L. (2021) · Journal of Chiropractic Education · doi:10.7899/jce-19-33 · Cited by 7
“It is important in the development of a blended course to have clear learning goals and objectives, keep the students engaged during learning sessions, and make the course enjoyable.(12) The design and implementation of this online course was based upon educational strategies used to promote the online learners’ exper…”
MethodAmoush, K. H., & Mizher, R. A. (2023) · Theory and Practice in Language Studies · doi:10.17507/tpls.1304.14 · Cited by 7
Cloud Computing as a Catalyst for Change in STEM Education
Sahlin, J. P., & Lobera, K. (2016) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-9924-3.ch002 · Cited by 7
Moving Toward the Centre: Transformative Learning, Global Learning, and Indigenization
Barker, T. (2020) · Journal of Transformative Learning · Cited by 7
Hsu, K.-C. (2016) · KU ScholarWorks (University of Kansas) · Cited by 6
Özüdoğru, M. (2021) · Journal of Pedagogical Research · doi:10.33902/jpr.2021472945 · Cited by 9
“…to active learning as it involves students’ calculating, discussing, creating, solving real-life problems, connecting concepts, etc. which is different from being passive receivers of knowledge (Lombardi, 2007) and leads to positive results in terms of student outcomes (Puzziferro & Shelton, 2008).”
BackgroundEngaging and Retaining Students in Online Learning
Abusalem, A., Bennett, L., & Antonelou-Abusalem, D. (2024) · Athens Journal of Education · doi:10.30958/aje.11-1-4 · Cited by 6
“The Columbia experiment recognised, and several papers affirmed, the need for cooperation among teachers, course planners, information technology experts, school officials, and students (Puzziferro & Shelton, 2008).”
Crowley, C., Chen, H., & Cerver, M. G. (2018) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · Cited by 6
Emerging Framework for Planning and Implementation of Online Programs
Hernández-Gantes, V. M. (2010) · International Journal of Adult Vocational Education and Technology · doi:10.4018/javet.2010100101 · Cited by 5
Developing Training Materials for the On-Line Course "Project Method in Teaching Higher Mathematics"
Власенко, К. В., Kondratyeva, O. M., Хижняк, І. А., Чумак, О., & Volkov, S. (2020) · International Conference on ICT in Education, Research and Industrial Applications: Integration, Harmonization and Knowledge Transfer (ICTERI) · doi:10.55056/ceur-ws.org/vol-2732/20200756.pdf · Cited by 5
Strategies for Online Course Development to Promote Student Success
Shelton, K., Mason, D., & Cummings, C. (2014) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-6046-5.ch012 · Cited by 5
“…it is important to remember that the technology should never be the deciding factor; appropriate pedagogy that centers more on the student and less on the instructor (Knowlton, 2000; Palloff & Pratt, 1999) should always be the focus of the course design (Puzziferro & Shelton, 2008) (see Table 1).”
BackgroundSelf-citationAlzahrani, A., & Cheon, J. (2015) · ThinkTech (Texas Tech University) · Cited by 5
Examining the Elements of Online Learning Quality in a Fully Online Doctoral Program.
Templeton, N. R., Ballenger, J. W., & Thompson, J. (2015) · Online journal of distance learning administration · Cited by 4
Investigating Learning Modalities among Diploma Students
Abdamia, N., Puteh, F. B., & Jah, N. J. A. (2023) · International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development · doi:10.6007/ijarped/v12-i2/16552 · Cited by 4
Designing for Learner success (D4LS) at Otago Polytechnic: From an E-learning designer’s perspective
Gedera, D. (2016) · Journal of Open Flexible and Distance Learning · doi:10.61468/jofdl.v20i2.272 · Cited by 4
Maphosa, C., Mthethwa-Kunene, K. E., & Rugube, T. T. (2020) · US-China Education Review A · doi:10.17265/2161-623x/2020.05.001 · Cited by 4
“In summarizing what online courses entail, Puzziferro and Shelton (2008 p 122) said: Quality online courses are well-organized into learning units; have clear learning goals and objectives; include materials and activities that directly support the learning goals and objectives; engage the learner…”
BackgroundDigital Attention Training: Improving the Mental Health and Well-Being of Adolescent Youth
Richelle, J., Dow, B. R., Pasch, A. M., Schooler, J. W., Mrazek, M. D., & Mrazek, A. J. (2024) · Creative Education · doi:10.4236/ce.2024.1510132 · Cited by 5
Time patterns and perceptions of online learning success factors
Cortés, A., & Barberà, E. (2013) · RACO (Revistes Catalanes amb Accés Obert) (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) · Cited by 3
Designing Online Courses as a Team
Abdous, M. (2019) · International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design · doi:10.4018/ijopcd.2020010105 · Cited by 3
Designing Effective Assessment Strategies for Online Courses in Higher Education
Efthymiou, I.-P. (2023) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-6684-8646-7.ch014 · Cited by 3
Designing Quality Blended Courses
Grincewicz, A. M. (2013) · Advances in mobile and distance learning book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-4912-5.ch004 · Cited by 3
Development of a Framework for the Use of a Tool for Machine Learning and Data Mining
Landeros, J. R., & Fuentes, M. D. L. M. (2016) · Research in Computing Science · doi:10.13053/rcs-122-1-10 · Cited by 3
“Is a framework that lists generic processes that instructional designers and training developers use [2].”
BackgroundA structural equation modelling in distance education teacher training classroom environments
Özüdoğru, M. (2022) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-021-10825-4 · Cited by 3
“Puzziferro and Shelton (2008) stated that active learning leads to positive results regarding student satisfaction and learning outcomes.”
BackgroundFernández, F. M. (2019) · Research Online (University of Wollongong) · Cited by 3
Comprehensive Review of University English Subjects: Results and Reflections
Chen, J. (2018) · doi:10.32234/jacetjournal.62.0_1 · Cited by 2
Flowers, L. O., Moore, J. L., & Flowers, L. A. (2010) · Cited by 2
DELES Analysis of E-Learning Environments
Keeney, H., Shelton, K., Mason, D., & Young, K. (2016) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-0877-9.ch007 · Cited by 2
Self-citationNorris, S. E. (2015) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-9577-1.ch001 · Cited by 2
STUDENT SURVEY FOR HIGHER EDUCATION QUALITY – CHALLENGES TO DESIGN AND ANALYSE DATA
Торбас, О. О., Hloviuk, I. V., & Malakhova, O. V. (2020) · Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews · doi:10.18510/hssr.2020.82e09 · Cited by 3
Marić, S., Velimirovic, L. Z., Velimirović, J. D., & Vranić, P. (2020) · IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (GHTC) · doi:10.1109/ghtc46280.2020.9342627 · Cited by 2
“In the ever-growing education market, the use of online learning increased the effectiveness of educational services worldwide [5],[6], by offering new, diverse, and innovative experience.”
BackgroundDeveloping an online course for marine engineering
Balagiu, A. (2020) · Scientific Bulletin of Naval Academy · doi:10.21279/1454-864x-20-i1-040 · Cited by 2
The Course Development Plan: Macro‐Level Decisions and Micro‐Level Processes
Franker, K., & James, D. (2016) · New Directions for Higher Education · doi:10.1002/he.20178 · Cited by 2
Astuti, S. R. D., & Rukmana, D. (2021) · Quality Assurance in Education · doi:10.1108/qae-12-2020-0148 · Cited by 2
خطوة, ا. ع. ا. ا. أ., & القباني, ن. ح. (2019) · المجلة العلمية المحکمة للجمعية المصرية للکمبيوتر التعليمي · doi:10.21608/eaec.2019.60075 · Cited by 1
Norris, S. E. (2017) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-3153-1.ch016 · Cited by 1
Three Essays on the Impact of Cost-saving Strategies on Student Outcomes
Xu, D. (2013) · doi:10.7916/d8mp59gd · Cited by 2
Whale, S., McGrath, N., Blackburn, A., McClenaghan, L., & Cluley, T. (2014) · EPubDev Repository · Cited by 1
Sewell, T. R. (2016) · Digital Commons - East Tennessee State University (East Tennessee State University) · Cited by 1
عقار, أ. ف. ص., عتمان, ا. س. م., & عوض, أ. م. (2023) · مجلة کلية التربية بدمياط · doi:10.21608/jsdu.2023.291588 · Cited by 1
Quality Matters: Development of an Online Course Shell for Quality-Control Courses
Sapkota, N. (2016) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/p.26022 · Cited by 1
Web 2.0 Ethics Education: Patents and Copyright for STEM Students
Walck, C. L., Huntoon, J. E., Baker, J., DeClerck, J. S., & Allred, N. (2020) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--22225 · Cited by 1
Puksa, M. (2020) · Journal of Vocational Education and Training · doi:10.1080/13636820.2020.1771099 · Cited by 1
“Sandelowski (2000) pointed out that codes in qualitative descriptive studies are data-derived and that summarizing the data numerically with descriptive statistics, confirms the patterns or regularities that have been identified in the data.”
BackgroundStandardizing Organizational Tools in the LMS for Your Digital Learning Course
Horn, S. E., & Restauri, S. (2020) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-2132-8.ch011 · Cited by 1
“When developing courses, Puzziferro and Shelton (2008) discuss that it is a complex process and professors need to consider consistency, design, pedagogy, and framework.”
BackgroundA FRAMEWORK FOR USE OF ADJUNCT FACULTY IN TEACHING SCHOOLS
(2018) · Issues in Information Systems · doi:10.48009/4_iis_2018_77-86 · Cited by 1
Ford, S. (2015) · ThinkTech (Texas Tech University) · Cited by 1
The Role of Adult Education in Online Delivery of Career and Technical Education
Hernández-Gantes, V. M. (2011) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-60960-153-9.ch016 · Cited by 1
Differentiation: A Taxonomy of Online Learner Types in Higher Education
Darby, D. S. (2019) · doi:10.12794/metadc1505153 · Cited by 1
Ryan, S. M., Bell, S. A., Simons, M. C., & Baillie, S. (2023) · doi:10.1002/9781119852865.ch7 · Cited by 1
PhD research papers dealing with time issues II
Clarà, M. (2013)
Kang, J.-J. (2013) · Michigan State University Libraries · doi:10.25335/dk0x-r883
Metadata
- Authors
- Puzziferro, M. J., & Shelton, K.
- ORCID
- Shelton, Kaye
- Venue
- Online Learning
- Publisher
- The Online Learning Consortium
- Published
- 2008-12-17
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 1092-8235 (ISSN-L)
- 2472-5730
- 2472-5749
- OpenAlex
- W1927189698
- Cited by
- 133
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 11.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Online Learning (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and E-Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Open Education and E-Learning
- Keywords
- online course design, systems approach, learning theory, instructional design, course quality, online learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
