The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A MODEL FOR DEVELOPING HIGH-QUALITY ONLINE COURSES: INTEGRATING A SYSTEMS APPROACH WITH LEARNING THEORY
Open accessAbstract
As the demand for online education continues to increase, institutions are faced with developing process models for efficient, high-quality online course development. This paper describes a systems, team-based, approach that centers on an online instructional design theory (Active Mastery Learning) implemented at Colorado State University-Global Campus.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“and learners acquiring higher class skills become more effective in today's competitive world (e.g., Puzziferro and Shelton [69]).”
From A Comparative Study of the ADDIE Instructional Design Model in Distance Education (2022) · cites this paper as Puzziferro and Shelton [69]
Citations
Cites
Human Characteristics and School Learning
Bennett, N., & Bloom, B. S. (1979) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3119887 · Cited by 1,732 · cited 3×
“Xu and Morris [14] studied team roles and curricular decisions of a course development team, consisting of a project coordinator, a web instructional designer, and four faculty members.”
BackgroundInfluentialIMPLEMENTING THE SEVEN PRINCIPLES: Technology as Lever
Ehrmann, S. C. (2004) · Cited by 1,023
How People Learn: Bridging Research and Practice
Donovan, M. S., Bransford, J. D., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2000) · Cited by 872
Lessons from the cyberspace classroom: the realities of online teaching
(2001) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.39-1083 · Cited by 634 · cited 1×
“There is general agreement of this principle in the literature [1, 2, 10]; however, in practice the technology can often be very alluring to creative and innovative instructional development teams--but technological bells and whistles will not replace good pedagogy.”
BackgroundGrowing by Degrees: Online Education in the United States, 2005.
Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2005) · Cited by 418
Collaborative Course Development for Online Courses
Xu, H., & Morris, L. V. (2007) · Innovative Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10755-006-9033-5 · Cited by 101
A University is not a Business (and Other Fantasies).
Greenberg, M. (2004) · Educational Review · Cited by 38
Hawkes, M. L., & Coldeway, D. O. (2002) · Cited by 37
Applying the ADDIE Model to Online Instruction
Shelton, K., & Saltsman, G. (2011) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-60960-503-2.ch305 · Cited by 33
Self-citationKazu, İ. Y., Kazu, H., & Özdemir, O. (2005) · Cited by 32
A Model for Enhancing Online Course Development
Knowles, E., & Kalata, K. (2007) · NSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University) · Cited by 26
Team Models in Online Course Development: A Unit-Specific Approach
Alvarez, D., Blair, K. L., Monske, E., & Wolf, A. (2005) · Cited by 24
Developing Courses for Online Delivery: One Strategy.
Luck, A. (2001) · Cited by 16
Supporting Instructors in the Creation of Online Distance Education Courses: Lessons Learned.
Byun, H.-S., Hallett, K., & Essex, C. (2000) · Educational Technology archive · Cited by 16
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Martin, F., Ritzhaupt, A. D., Kumar, S., & Budhrani, K. (2019) · Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.04.001 · Cited by 326
Xu, D., & Jaggars, S. S. (2013) · Economics of Education Review · doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2013.08.001 · Cited by 359
“…through a team-based approach, with faculty collaborating with an instructional designer and often with additional support staff (Alvarez, Blair, Monske, & Wolf, 2005; Hawkes & Coldeway, 2002; Hixon, 2008; Knowles & Kalata, 2007; Puzziferro & Shelton, 2008; Thille, 2008; Xu & Morris, 2007).”
BackgroundA Comparative Study of the ADDIE Instructional Design Model in Distance Education
Spatioti, A. G., Kazanidis, I., & Pange, J. (2022) · Information · doi:10.3390/info13090402 · Cited by 689
“…into a creative process, thus creating strong parallels with constructivist approaches that emphasize creation as a central role in the construction of knowledge, and learners acquiring higher class skills become more effective in today’s competitive world (e.g., Puzziferro and Shelton [69]).”
BackgroundThe future of mindfulness training is digital, and the future is now
Mrazek, A. J., Mrazek, M. D., Cherolini, C. M., Cloughesy, J. N., Cynman, D. J., Gougis, L. J., Landry, A. P., Reese, J. V., & Schooler, J. W. (2019) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.11.012 · Cited by 201
Chen, B., Kern, D. E., Kearns, R. M., Thomas, P. A., Hughes, M. T., & Tackett, S. A. (2019) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000002580 · Cited by 212
Metadata
- Authors
- Puzziferro, M. J., & Shelton, K.
- ORCID
- Shelton, Kaye
- Venue
- Online Learning
- Publisher
- The Online Learning Consortium
- Published
- 2008-12-17
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 1092-8235 (ISSN-L)
- 2472-5730
- 2472-5749
- OpenAlex
- W1927189698
- Cited by
- 133
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 11.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Online Learning (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and E-Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Open Education and E-Learning
- Keywords
- online course design, systems approach, learning theory, instructional design, course quality, online learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
