Shared Metacognition in a Community of Inquiry
Open accessAbstract
The article begins with a review of the shared metacognition construct and its function within the Community of Inquiry theoretical framework. The primary focus of the shared metacognition construct is the role of learners to take responsibility and control for monitoring and managing learning in a community of inquiry. Pragmatic challenges are explored through an analysis of recent research and a discussion of implementation issues. It is emphasized that shared metacognition is shaped by the teaching presence construct (planning, facilitation, and direction instruction) and its overlap with cognitive presence operationalized by the phases of the Practical Inquiry model (problem defining, exploration, integration, and resolution). The manuscript concludes with a discussion of the potential for future research associated with shared metacognition and the use of a quantitative shared metacognition questionnaire.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
CoI-based course activities are essential for supporting students' self- and co-regulated learning within shared metacognitive environments.
“Garrison (2022) emphasized that CoI-based course activities are essential for supporting students' self- and co-regulated learning within shared metacognitive environments.”
From Exploring Relationships Between Undergraduate Students’ Perceived Community of Inquiry, Engagement, and Shared Metacognition in Asynchronous Online Courses (2026) · cites this paper as Garrison, 2022
Shared metacognition is not an individual skill but a knowledge construction process at a group level that strengthens both presence and engagement in asynchronous online courses.
“Shared metacognition is thus not an individual skill but a knowledge construction process at a group level that strengthens both presence and engagement in asynchronous online courses.”
From Exploring Relationships Between Undergraduate Students’ Perceived Community of Inquiry, Engagement, and Shared Metacognition in Asynchronous Online Courses (2026) · cites this paper as Garrison, 2022
Engagement is closely linked to the presence of shared metacognitive processes.
“Moreover,engagement (defined as the behavioral, emotional, and cognitive investment in learning) has been found to be closely linked to the presence of shared metacognitive processes.”
From Exploring Relationships Between Undergraduate Students’ Perceived Community of Inquiry, Engagement, and Shared Metacognition in Asynchronous Online Courses (2026) · cites this paper as Garrison, 2022
When learners are actively involved in monitoring and managing their learning in small groups, they are more likely to demonstrate sustained engagement and deeper learning outcomes.
“When learners are actively involved in monitoring and managing their learning in small groups, they are more likely to demonstrate sustained engagement and deeper learning outcomes (Garrison, 2022).”
From Exploring Relationships Between Undergraduate Students’ Perceived Community of Inquiry, Engagement, and Shared Metacognition in Asynchronous Online Courses (2026) · cites this paper as Garrison, 2022
Meaningful learning in a CoI requires a shift from individual performance to shared inquiry and responsibility.
“This finding supports Garrison's (2022) assertion that meaningful learning in a CoI requires a shift from individual performance to shared inquiry and responsibility.”
From Exploring Relationships Between Undergraduate Students’ Perceived Community of Inquiry, Engagement, and Shared Metacognition in Asynchronous Online Courses (2026) · cites this paper as Garrison's (2022)
Shared metacognition is shaped by the overlap between CP and TP.
“Despite these challenges, our findings demonstrated moderate and significant correla -tions between CP, TP, and both self- and co-regulation, suggesting that shared metacognition is shaped by the overlap between CP and TP (Garrison, 2022).”
From Exploring Relationships Between Undergraduate Students’ Perceived Community of Inquiry, Engagement, and Shared Metacognition in Asynchronous Online Courses (2026) · cites this paper as Garrison, 2022
Cited by
Sorted by citations
<scp>AI</scp>‐driven adaptive learning for sustainable educational transformation
Strielkowski, W., Grebennikova, V., Lisovskiy, A., Rakhimova, G., & Vasileva, T. (2025) · Sustainable Development · doi:10.1002/sd.3221 · Cited by 581 · see citing works
Using narrative inquiry research methodology in online educational environments
Rice, M. F. (2024) · Educational technology research and development · doi:10.1007/s11423-023-10260-x · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Olesova, L., Sadaf, A., & Yan, W. (2026) · Technology, Knowledge and Learning · doi:10.1007/s10758-026-09953-y · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Garrison, R.
- Venue
- Online Learning
- Publisher
- The Online Learning Consortium
- Published
- 2022-03-01
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1092-8235 (ISSN-L)
- 2472-5730
- 2472-5749
- OpenAlex
- W4221108189
- Cited by
- 81
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 7
- FWCI
- 33.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Online Learning (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Leadership and Innovation
- Keywords
- community of inquiry, teaching presence, cognitive presence, metacognition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review